http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/ Engadget Comments for iPod nanos set to double capacity, iPod touch likely unchanged in preparation for price cuts? (updated) http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 4:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 10:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
"Updated black and white classic"? No silver (or colour screen)?]]>Sep 9th 2008 10:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 10:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 3:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/I was pretty much definitely going to get one after this show anyway, so a price drop would be welcome, but I was hoping for at least an updated... well, anything.
Surprise us, Apple!]]>Sep 9th 2008 4:31AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Not sure how last year was a "let down", because Apple basically refreshed their entire line-up back then. New Touches, new Nanos, new iPod flagship model. Maybe *this* year it will be a snoozer, yeah.]]>Sep 9th 2008 9:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 9:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 10:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 4:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/]]>Sep 9th 2008 7:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Why must I pay for every new update?!

*cough*lucky iphone users *cough*]]>Sep 9th 2008 4:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
I believe most other manufacturers provide new features to existing customers for free? Correct me if I'm wrong......!]]>Sep 9th 2008 11:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/And I don't mean you don't have to download them, I mean you don't have to pay for them. ]]>Sep 9th 2008 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 8:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Why must I pay for every new update?!

*cough*lucky iphone users *cough*]]>Sep 9th 2008 4:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 4:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Oh, and also: Nobody is forcing you to do so]]>Sep 9th 2008 5:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 7:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 9:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 4:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
]]>Sep 9th 2008 4:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 11:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
The iPod touch will be a true 2Gen version next September, following a true 2Gen iPhone earlier in 2009, would recon higher def screen (204ppi like the nano) possibly bigger screen, 4inch diagonal screen possibly, smaller home button (they gota make that thing light up at some point), same size device overall.

The nano as you can see in the photo, 204ppi screen but bigger than the last generation nano, apples screen manufacturer testing the stability of increased screen size ready for iPhone and touch next year.

Now, we have the classic, what happened to that old boy. If any ipod ever needed a proper seeing to the classic dose. Smaller click wheel with possibly some kind of back lighting effect (as patented by apple last year). Bigger 204ppi screen, same size casing, massive memory but on single plater HD so device thinner overall, improved UI leaning toward 'touch' operation without touch screen. I think I might actually by one even though I love my touch.

Saying all that, probably going to be a disappointment with cheep case redesigns and volume button on the touch. When designers start adding curves you know they can’t think of anything better.
]]>Sep 9th 2008 4:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
It only exists because Apple haven't been able to match the capacity of the Touch. That's why they are doing little to change it. The Classic is a dead model based on a 6 year old design and it should have been killed years ago.]]>Sep 9th 2008 5:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 10:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Next few minutes? I thought the event didn't happen in the US for at east another 8 hours?]]>Sep 9th 2008 4:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
No - they always do that during the Keynote speech whilst the new products are being spokent about and then bring it back up after it's been announced.

Either way, I can't see this being just about new iPods or an iPod Nano. The stock's gonna dip drastically if that's all they've got to announce.]]>Sep 9th 2008 6:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 11:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Back in the day I thought my 60 GB iPod was large, then I outgrew it. THEN they came out with the 120 GB and my mouth dropped. I knew I had to get it. I've got it, and it's full. Just now I had to remove stuff to sync. I wouldn't mind another drastic jump in size though.

With that said, I have played with the iPod Touch and if they gave it 100 GB or more, I would lovingly fork over the money required to upgrade/downgrade to it.]]>Sep 9th 2008 6:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:28AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 7:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 10:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 7:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 11:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
Think man...]]>Sep 9th 2008 11:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://ckybe.livejournal.com/17063.html
]]>Sep 9th 2008 5:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
I know its not real (at least I hope not)]]>Sep 9th 2008 5:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/
What do you think the "next big aple" thing will be?]]>Sep 9th 2008 5:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/ipod-nanos-to-double-capacity-ipod-touch-wont-budge/Sep 9th 2008 5:57AM