<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh I want a dual touchscreen]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[myzter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[To do what, exactly? Play DS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[The spy shots were really right haha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy K.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even Nano's picture itself used in the presentation has glare on the screen. This is not good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meh, engadget changed the picture now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah, unfortunately.<br><br>I was hoping for something new, not something apple modified in 30 minutes and decided it looked different enough.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Arthur<br><br>I for one would love i scaled down touch, more screen, smaller to carry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah and now since skinny Steve announced 'em theyre suddenly not ugly anymore...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Storm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's kind of shaped like jobs... long, gaunt and slightly swollen in the belly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[konshuss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[too tall]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ynx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Divx, xvid support? Not for you!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kevin Rose is God to the fanboys from this day forward!....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iSmoke,therefore emit death by breathing]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[hahahahahaha and people make fun of M$ because it charges for everything 10$ for a PATCH? HAHAHA.<br><br>F this, sticking with Ubuntu desktop and xp ONLY for gaming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aBsOlUt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 4:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[chinese was faster to start selling same looking MP4's - funny:-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuriy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why so much empty space above and below the click wheel?<br><br>Click wheel looks a bit old-tech now =).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Considering how small it is, it makes sense to have space above, so your finger won't smudge the screen, and below, so your finger won't slip off the bottom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kigamoosh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[its called ergonomics]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 11th 2008 4:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow. I'm surprised!.<br><br>Really.<br><br>:)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xValentine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me too. I've got a Z80 but damn the new Nano looks taste. Might nab a blur or orange. Reminds me of the days when I was one of the first guys in my city with a Mini.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[WoW ....Cool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tumclub]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2008 12:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[god they are ugly ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DerekKramer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seconded.  I'm no Apple fan but for looks I'd choose the older gen Nano.<br><br>Good thing Apple don't market on looks eh?  Oh, wait...<br><br>The capacity bump sounds good though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Black would have been better, but Apple is saving that so that they can fleece a 32GB model just before the holiday season arrives, thus selling multiple units to fan boyz and fangirlz all across the land.... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iEye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPod Nano:  gay pride edition]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PynkFloydd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually I think the colors are cool. I need to see them in person though. Sometimes pictures are misleading.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobile Phone Diva]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not a fan of the ellipse shape, but I am glad the finally put the screen next to the scroll wheel instead of on top of it. I'd been saying they should do that since the fatty nano came out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tiuk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2008 1:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess kevin rose was right...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bdad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[For anyone who cares, it is not an oval.  It's an ellipse, although maybe an elongated one at that.<br><br>Why do people insist on calling an ellipse an oval!!  :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Stieger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[I still like my 3rd gen nano better. Bigger Screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, the screen is the same as the 3rd Gen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you sure? I thought they said they just rotated the screen from the third gen 90 degrees.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BradVT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[So when are they going to do something new?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[When its not broken, you dont need to fix it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kain125]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Kain125<br>"When its not broken, you dont need to fix it. "<br><br>Yeah, tell that to US auto makers. This shit is old.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DEEZNUTZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget, how's about you condense all of this Apple crap into one or two posts, k?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WhoMe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not just move the wheel to the back and save the front purely for a widescreen/portrait layout?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because then you'd get people who didn't like having to operate the thing blind.  There'd be people stopping in the street so they could keep glancing at the back to see the controls and then the front to see if they've scrolled too far, and back and forth and back and forth...<br><br>I love navigating by the touch of my MiniDisc's (Yes, MiniDisc.  So I'm out of date) buttons, but not everyone likes that kind of thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you underestimate people, but I think I might feel the same way if I didn't own an ipod. The click wheel is one the greatest innovations in tech and what makes it great is that it's easy to use, so I don't think that it would slow people down they'd get used to it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA["The click wheel is one the greatest innovations in tech"<br><br>It's the same thing as a touch pad, which have existed since the early eighties.<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchpad" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touchpad</a><br><br>"Touchpads are also the primary control interface for menu navigation on all of the currently produced iPod portable music players (except the iPod shuffle and iPod touch), where they are referred to as “click wheels”."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dubb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 10:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to see that too for the next nano - remember Apple filed a patent for a virtual scroll wheel that could appear when you touch the physical one so there would  be no need to do it blind, when the scroll wheel detects a finger it could just display a transparent representation of the wheel on the screen]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[snife]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 11:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>I like your idea of the entire front of the ipod being used for the screen, but not the wheel on the back, instead I'd sugg putting the wheel on a hinge'd extension at the bottom, you know that folds up (to protect and cover the screen) and then folds down below the screen, for use.<br><br>Michael X.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael X. Maelstrom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2008 6:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Michael X. That sounds hideous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyHeadisFed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2008 10:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[calendar and stopwatch integration? do i smell nike and ipod nano union?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Boarderwoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like: "The thinnes Steve Ever"<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Haha thank god I'm not the only one who noticed how thin he's become. Next time it's the iPod that will be introducing him "Here's the new Steve, thinner than ever and comes with either a brown a black turtle neck."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Homeboy<br>That was by far the funnies comment that I've read on engadget. LOL<br>"Here's the new Steve, thinner than ever and comes with either a brown a black turtle neck."<br>OMG too funny!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 2:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[I totally agree, I think Steve is the thinest iPod ever.  lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ilikemyrealname]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 10th 2008 9:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bloody knew it was real! Yet 99% of comments here pointed it was fake, LOL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cheers mate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/09/official-ipod-nano-reaches-4g-looks-tall-for-its-age/</guid><description><![CDATA[shake to shuffle is nice.  My Sony Ericsson phone does it and it can be handy...if not a little gimmicky.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jorvay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 9th 2008 1:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
