http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/ Engadget Comments for Apple iPod touch 2G and nano 4G: The Engadget Review http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
Nicotine teeth.
Golden shower.
Dirty earwax.


Ugly yellow.]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 10:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 11:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 3:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
I'd prefer to have something that works easily even though it adds 2mm of thickness.]]>Sep 20th 2008 7:20AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 5:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 6:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/I don't get the whole fad about making everything thin on the cost of usability.

I'd prefer to have something that works easily even though it adds 2mm of thickness.

I disagree. Maybe I don't get the fad but that functional i dont care how it looks kind of attitude is the downfall or going to be downfall of a lot of companies. People underestimate the cool factor, i mean look at Starbucks, Apple they are generally considered cool (maybe not with geeks yeo) and have "superior quality". I suppose people think they want that works well but the truly successful companies sort of been ahead of the curve. They've come up with things that you didn't know you wanted. I didn't know I wanted a thin ipod and until I saw it. I desired it, it was sexy.]]>Sep 22nd 2008 5:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
Yes, all other companies = fail!]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
It is evolution. It just isn't a reinvention each time. I just bought the new 2G touch for my wife and it is a joy to use. Now I am trying to find an excuse to buy one for me...]]>Sep 19th 2008 9:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 10:05AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 8:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
I can't wait for that hard outside/soft inside case to come out for the new one already, that'll be sweet!!!]]>Sep 19th 2008 9:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
you may want to test yours to see if you have the same issue and please let me know. maybe I had a bad one, I dont know but I would like to re-purchase one when they fix that issue. ]]>Sep 19th 2008 11:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 11:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
/not being serious]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
Of course if you're already listening randomly it's easier to hit next.
I wonder if it occurred to the reviewer to be listening to an album straight-though, decide you don't like a song and just want to hear random, and shake.]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 12:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
---Germ]]>Sep 20th 2008 11:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/I don't know, but I lean so strongly towards "yes, the hold button turns shake off" that I'm willing to tell that to customers.
After all, they make an armband for the nano, and I just can't believe that Apple would overlook such a potentially glaring flaw.]]>Sep 20th 2008 6:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 20th 2008 10:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
There are many reasons why I'd have songs I don't like on my iPod.

1. Ever since getting my first iPod (2nd gen, the one I still have), the world of music just opened up to me (i.e. I started pirating freakin' everything). I found myself with a Ton of music I had never heard on my little player.

I don't pirate any more, but even
2. On new albums I buy, there might be a few tracks I dislike.
I also tend not to erase things that I don't like on the first try just in case I may be making a mistake in its beauty. Maybe I don't see what makes it good now. There's a lot of music that I Love that had to grow on me. (Tool, The Mars Volta...)

3. The track doesn't fit the mood I'm in, therefore I don't want to listen to it.

4. It's a song I used to like, but I've since grown tired of its repetitious hooks and I've heard it so much it now disgusts me.

I'm sure you can come up with some reasons you might have music you dislike/'want to skip a track but not delete it' on your iPod too.]]>Sep 21st 2008 12:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
Looking at http://www.engadget.com/tag/review, I see our last review was the Sony VAIO Z, with the Palm Treo Pro and Samsung Omnia before that. In fact, the last Apple product we reviewed was the iPhone 3G, in July.

Like I always say, you see what you want to see.]]>Sep 19th 2008 8:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=review

Amazing.]]>Sep 19th 2008 8:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Wow, my eyes must have been closed. When was the last time Engadget made a review? Oh wait.

]]>Sep 19th 2008 8:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 8:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 10:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
If you count this as a proper review http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/16/zune-3-0-hands-on/ then this blog is as apple biased as some fanboys want me to believe. I look at gizmodo's multi page review and I actually felt like they're subjective opinion had some basis in logic. Your review, to be honest, was shite. 5 paragraphs only!!!

It really seems like you're equal coverage to all the DAPs. It really does

http://gizmodo.com/5051440/microsoft-zune-30-software-review]]>Sep 20th 2008 11:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
What the hell is that noise?]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
The App Store was an instant win for me :)]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/Sep 19th 2008 7:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
Pfft. Clak, you're such an attention whore I think you'll prostitute your mind out to and least your wasted breath to any innane topic merely to get attention.]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/19/apple-ipod-touch-2g-and-nano-4g-the-engadget-review/
The new iPods have just rolled out the door, its a hot new product you expect them NOT to review it?

Its fair to say both the new zune updates and new iPod's have been getting equal bloggage over the last week :)]]>Sep 19th 2008 7:57PM