http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/ Engadget Comments for US Appeals court sez Qualcomm infringed on two Broadcom patents http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 3:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 3:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/ 19.28, +0.89, +4.8%) than it is detrimental to Qualcomm (QCOM: 44.56, -1.35, -2.9%).]]>Sep 24th 2008 3:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 3:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/
Broadcom wins and Qualcomm loses so of course their stocks will reflect that accordingly.]]>Sep 24th 2008 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/
mykie was pointing out that there was more of a % increase in BC's stock than there was a % decrease in QC's stock.

it doesn't take wall street to figure out that there would be some form of movement in those directions... oh wait, wall what now?]]>Sep 24th 2008 4:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/
If you aren't familiar with the back-story to this post, it makes for one hell of a (long) read. In fact, it would make one hell of a movie (in case any movie execs are reading this, you heard it here first).
]]>Sep 24th 2008 4:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/
Are they like two tiny countries that have a war somewhere in the middle east, that is on the news but nobody really cares, since whoever wins doesn't make any difference, and just keeps on opressing people?

Should I use more perioids?]]>Sep 24th 2008 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 4:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 4:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 4:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 5:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 5:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 5:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/
Hmmm... if somebody made a company named Quadcomm, could they get away with stuff like this just by confusing senile judges?]]>Sep 24th 2008 5:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/24/us-appeals-court-sez-qualcomm-infringed-on-two-broadcom-patents/Sep 24th 2008 7:12PM