<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Porn is not a limitation, it's just the final frontier.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[avester]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apps I've got from the App Store (that I've used in double-digit counts):<br><br>1. Facebook<br>2. Bomberman (Got over real quick; haven't played since, I think)<br>3. Trism<br>4. MobileFinder<br>5. Wikipanion<br>6. IM+<br><br><br><br>Apps I've got off of Cydia that I use frequently:<br><br>1. Cycorder<br>2. Snapture<br>3. Finder (newly released, but gotta have it)<br>4. Winterboard<br>5. Searcher<br>6. BiteSMS<br>7. Categories<br>8. Terminal<br><br>See the type of applications in both categories. I don't wanna say anything else.<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohit Kapur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, I forgot a very important app from the Cydia list:<br><br>9. QuickGold. It's a MUST-HAVE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohit Kapur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a porn app. Its called Safari.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@avester:<br>Here's to saving the best for last, then?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rohit Kapur<br><br>Yeah, all my useful apps are from Cydia too, the app store is a bunch of lame apps that might be fun but they're not terribly useful.<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Swearing will make you unpopular too. :P<br><br><br><br>And I think you're not looking at Apple's competition very well; somehow much freer application availability is working for them.<br><br>As for what other platforms approach the ubiquity of the iPhone: S60 would be a good start. Even Windows Mobile (counting all incarnations) has more devices. And both of them have readily available SDKs and don't have a single choke point that even the most trivial app must pass. (S60 does require approval of the developer for apps requesting certain capabilities, but no app-by-app discretion even for these.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 7:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Steve, I hope you're reading this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[He can't hear you talking, he has his turtleneck pulled up over his ears and is whispering "nanananananaaaaa"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[The mock turtleneck you mean? Not bloody likely. Prolly has the whole shirt over his head, covering the top with the latest issue of the new yorker.<br><br>Poor guy, let's not...<br><br>Mock him? Duuude.<br><br>Go ahead. Low rate this one, it went to hell faster than I could control.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucretius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right on.  I think Apple believe they have hit oil with this, and that supply will soon run dry if they don't sort the situation out.  I had an iPhone on release in UK and the App Store was great when the first few good apps came out but I haven't used it since, too many god damn duplicate flashlight/calculator bullshit apps (as mentioned in the article).  Let some REAL developers make some REAL useful apps.  I wanted to start developing for the iPhone in my free time (c# developer) which would be a pretty big task and I'm pretty sure I could put some genuinely useful apps out there.  However, until there is some clear rules and less monkeys assessing app approval/rejection I am not going to bother.<br><br>I have bought a LOT of Apple products and I have great respect for the company and so far the quality of service, but this is outrageous.  Fuck you, Apple, sort it out.<br><br>Great article, you win 10 internets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[trickards]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed.  I don't even have an iPhone, but I'm thinking I'd like one in<br>the future.  Or maybe not...  This whole thing is making it look kind<br>of stupid.<br><br>Fuck you Apple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 8:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[I completely agree. I love the iPhone / iPod Touch and think it is a fantastic device that pushes the mobile device world ahead by 5 years. The lightweight, optimized OSX is an excellent platform for application developers, even acknowledging the relative arcane (for the uninitiated) Cocoa/Obj-C platform. It uses a powerful, mature development environment and debugging tools.<br><br>The irony in all of this is that the primary issue of contention isn't related to the device itself, or the Obj-C based platform, or the SDK (or even the annoying Mac fanboys), but Apple itself! What they need to do is get the hell out of the way and let the developer community make it happen! Their nonsensical behavior of locking down the SDK material and stifling cooperation and collaboration between developers with non-disclosure agreements is vastly counterproductive --- that is --- if their goal is indeed to ensure the future success of the platform! I don't knows what is really going on, but from my (admittedly limited) perspective, I'm going to speculate that Apple's patent attorneys and/or other legal representatives have gone overboard perhaps on trying to protect (at least what they think is) patentable intellectual property contained within the SDK. I may be completely wrong, but I can't think of any other reasonable alternative.<br><br>Steve Jobs and his top executives obviously have to understand the importance of the developer community having open access to knowledge about the platform and being able to discuss, collaborate on and assist each other with application development, debugging, troubleshooting, etc. So there has got to be some legitimate purpose to the (hopefully temporary) draconian use of the developer NDA to keep information from being shared publicly about the SDK. <br><br>And I've been saying this all along for years now -- that Apple and S. Jobs has got to realize the importance of transparency and proper communication with it's partners, developers, and users. I'm not suggesting that they need to share future product details, but they definitely need to communicate their position when certain problems arise and how they intend to fix them. This would go a long way to preventing the kind of lingering bad press and customer frustration that we've seen over the past few years. When issues come up, we usually receive nothing but silence from Apple headquarters, sometimes followed much later by a succinct "open letter" from Mr. Jobs, and many times nothing at all. Even a simple, reassuring "we are working on the problem" or "we haven't come to a conclusion on the  issue" would be much more desirable than the present situation. <br><br>Similarly, at the moment, developers just want to know when they are going to be able to discuss problems with each other and seek help from online and offline resources. Especially in software development, people are always encountering the same issues and problems and will end up perpetually re-inventing the wheel if they are unable to communicate amongst themselves. In addition, the "app store" and the health and robustness of the platform suffer from the inability of new developers to seek out guidance and assistance getting started with the platform. Online forums can't be used, help groups can't be started, developers can't collaborate with each other, books and guides by experts cannot be published, etc. These types resources are how many software engineers and developers got started in the first place, and especially when attempting to move to a new platform and programming language. Everyone cannot just enroll into the computer science department at Stanford to receive officially sanctioned assistance with iPhone development or get a new job at an existing Mac development house with Obj-C/Cocoa/iPhone developemtn experts.  <br><br>Apple needs to fix this mess and fix it now!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 8:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd like to chime in to Apple's defense at the risk of becoming unpopular in this thread.<br><br>Apple's iPhone platform is precedent-setting and unique in the field of computing.<br><br>While we are tempted to treat it like a microPC or mini laptop platform, it is in fact a device in a field heretofore dominated by embedded devices.<br><br>With the iPhone, Apple must provide a Quality of Service (QoS) above and beyond that of a PC or similar device.<br><br>On a desktop PC, it makes no difference if you run a program that slows down your system or crashes your OS.<br><br>On a phone, that's disastrous.  A phone is almost like a real-time device, and the core feauture-set must be protected from the p2p flavour of the month and unneccesary podcast app or  what have you.  It's bad enough that people are using this thing as a music player, movie player, camera, web browser, mirror, to-do-list tracker, calendar, mame cabinet, telnet client, pocket protector, coffee cup warmer, cellular modem .. you get the idea.<br><br>If you want to sail with the big pirates in the ocean of independent software choices, you're going to have to leave the play pen and take responsibility for your actions.  Jailbreaking your iPhone is one clear way of doing that, and it's the perfect balance between voiding your warranty and allowing you free reign over your hardware.  Your system crashes because you effed it up?  It's your fault bigboy.  You broke it, you can fix it.<br><br>For every forum like engadget's complaining about obstinance on Apple's part, there would be a hundred more starbucks-swigging urban techno-trolls whining that their iPhone stopped working after they installed limewire and tried to download Led zeppelin's entire discography or every episode of the sopranos.<br><br>How many other platforms even come this close to the ubiquity of the iPhone?  Does anyone complain that there is no SDK for devices X,Y and Z?  To be honest I have no idea.  I don't even own a cell phone.  If I did, I'd buy an iPod touch and jailbreak it to use wifi and voip.<br><br>Steve knows exactly what he's doing and I hope he does read this thread. at least he'll know enough to contact me and send me a free ipod as a thanks.  (or sue me)<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex kessaris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 12:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd like to chime in to Apple's defense at the risk of becoming unpopular in this thread.<br><br>Apple's iPhone platform is precedent-setting and unique in the field of computing.<br><br>While we are tempted to treat it like a microPC or mini laptop platform, it is in fact a device in a field heretofore dominated by embedded devices.<br><br>With the iPhone, Apple must provide a Quality of Service (QoS) above and beyond that of a PC or similar device.<br><br>On a desktop PC, it makes no difference if you run a program that slows down your system or crashes your OS.<br><br>On a phone, that's disastrous.  A phone is almost like a real-time device, and the core feauture-set must be protected from the p2p flavour of the month and unneccesary podcast app or  what have you.  It's bad enough that people are using this thing as a music player, movie player, camera, web browser, mirror, to-do-list tracker, calendar, mame cabinet, telnet client, pocket protector, coffee cup warmer, cellular modem .. you get the idea.<br><br>If you want to sail with the big pirates in the ocean of independent software choices, you're going to have to leave the play pen and take responsibility for your actions.  Jailbreaking your iPhone is one clear way of doing that, and it's the perfect balance between voiding your warranty and allowing you free reign over your hardware.  Your system crashes because you effed it up?  It's your fault bigboy.  You broke it, you can fix it.<br><br>For every forum like engadget's complaining about obstinance on Apple's part, there would be a hundred more starbucks-swigging urban techno-trolls whining that their iPhone stopped working after they installed limewire and tried to download Led zeppelin's entire discography or every episode of the sopranos.<br><br>How many other platforms even come this close to the ubiquity of the iPhone?  Does anyone complain that there is no SDK for devices X,Y and Z?  To be honest I have no idea.  I don't even own a cell phone.  If I did, I'd buy an iPod touch and jailbreak it to use wifi and voip.<br><br>Steve knows exactly what he's doing and I hope he does read this thread. at least he'll know enough to contact me and send me a free ipod as a thanks.  (or sue me)<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex kessaris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 12:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, double posting will certainly make me unpopular,<br>but I swear it was a browser glitch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex kessaris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@alex kessaris: Re iPhone being so unique<br><br>When the PalmOS came out it did have problems sandboxing 3rd party apps.  WinMo and Symbian appeared to have learned from this and have avoided many if not all of the issues.<br><br>I have used iPhone, WinMo, and PalmOS devices.  Even with some pretty intensive apps installed the WinMo 6 device has been the most stable.  An iPhone  app crashed daily, the Palm OS itself crashed weekly.  My trusty WinMo 6 phone has an app crash maybe once a month.<br><br>So if other mobile OS platforms can fully support 3rd party apps why is Apple so concerned about bad apps breaking the iPhone?  Perhaps because the iPhone OS is not that robust?<br><br>Lets be honest here; the iPhone brought a cool aesthetic design, multi-touch screen, and a very cool browser experience.  But that's it.  Everything else already existed in the marketplace.<br><br>Also, there was a comment here along the lines of "Apple let the developers talk to each other."  There are numerous Android blogs, user groups, and coding support sites already up and running.  A quick search for iPhone development support only returned hits to Apple.com itself.  I found several Cocoa development sites, but none relating specifically to the iPhone.<br><br>Surely my search results merely failed to locate iPhone dev resource sites, and that they do exist.  If not what is Apple thinking? <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@alex:<br>   You write a long post about the smartphone landscape, making such sweeping claims as the iPhone being "precedent setting and unique in the field" and at the end you disclose you don't even own a cell phone?  WTF man?<br>   I'd like to know what platform you have first hand experience with a phone crashing due to apps, or being unable to answer a phone call- besides the iPhone?  You've been kneeling at the altar of Apple too long, buddy.  Cell phones and SmartPhones as a class are pretty reliable.  I do own a SmartPhone and do it use it everyday and have never lost phone functionality, never had a virus, never had a dodgy app tank my phone.<br>   Steve Jobs' claims of not allowing native apps on the iPhone at first because of security and reliability concerns seems pretty dodgy.  They initially launched a product with previous generation hardware and still had issues, then followed it up with an even buggier untried chipset.  If Apple opens up the App Store at least they could blame devs for the platform's issues.<br>   All this FUD about independantly dev'd apps creating a breeding ground for abuse and generally destroying the basic functions of the phone is crap.  If you look at the much-maligned WinMo platform, they don't have these issues.  I'm not aware of any platform that has these issues.  If you sell a decent platform that is set-up for a good experience at retail purchase, users will be able to judge for themselves when performance has become un-acceptable because of installed apps.<br>   Don't make excuses for Apple in that they want to keep their device pristine and free from crippling issues- they've disproved that themselves.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris in CA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[a buddy of mine submitted an app that when your iphone is on your hip and you lift your leg it makes a fart sound.  he submitted it to apple and they refused to put it in the app store saying it was obscene?  ridiculous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't wait for someone to do something interesting for the iPhone...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Nelson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bastards!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now that's just funny, not obscene.  I would pay money for the app, if I had an iPhone that is.  Stupid....poor....student. :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Super S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[damnit. i wanted to write that exact app.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lostarchitect]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder why? Sounds like the sort of app iPhone users would go for in droves. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 4:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey Matt,<br>Thanks for the support.  Apple just couldn't see the humor.  Obscene,  maybe they should think about how obscene some of the song lyrics are on iTunes.  Same thing goes for some of the movies.  I think the user should have the choice to buy what they want and install it on their phone.  I'm considering discontinuing development for the iPhone, and taking a long hard look at Android.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[btw here is a video demonstrating his app:<br><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBoAY7cq3QE&feature=email" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBoAY7cq3QE&feature=email</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2008 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[the problem with the App store is that Apple refuses to let Apps in that do things better than Apple designed programs...for Ex, the Mail App that was made the included all the gmail features was nixed becasue it would over lap Apples mail app...<br><br>Apple wont admit that there are better products out there than its own designed apps,  dont cross apple and your apps get approved]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[From My Cube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe Google told Apple not to let it on there- after all, if someone else made an app for Gmail without Google's consent, they might be reluctant to let it through for copyright/trademark/patent/whateverthhell infringement.<br><br>If it was Google that made the app, they would have known before submitting that it wouldn't be let in (Google and Apple are tight, remember?)...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[who?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[wtf? Sorry, From My Cube, that wasn't directed at you.  "Bastards!" was supposed to be in reply to the fart guy's comment.<br><br>Well, at least the comment system looks cooler now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe Google told Apple not to let it on there- after all, if someone else made an app for Gmail without Google's consent, they might be reluctant to let it through for copyright/trademark/patent/whateverthhell infringement.<br><br>If it was Google that made the app, they would have known before submitting that it wouldn't be let in (Google and Apple are tight, remember?)...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[who?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[What reason does Nokia have to be simmering? They aren't losing marketshare due to the iPhone. They're still number one and their smartphone OS is still number one.<br><br>A bunch of fanboys downloading calculator and myspace apps won't hurt Nokia in any way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ILoveApple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ummmm<br><br>No one cares about nokia's smartphone...even if they realize that nokia *makes* a smartphone.<br><br>The smartphone market is divided between Windows Mobile, Blackberry, Palm and iPhone. Nokia cant compete. <br><br>When you cant compete, you should not bother playing the game. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joe-- you ignorant little turtleweed- Step outside the US and see for yourslef, Nokia doesnt hold, it 'owns' a good percentage of the smartphone market. RIM, BB, WinMo only try to compete, and iPhone its not even a minority it would be classified in the 'Other' category.<br><br>Now go do what u teenagers do...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Joe<br><br>That was quite possible the most stupid thing I've ever read.  Thank you for that life enriching moment. <br><br>Now fuck off and die.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[And Apple wonders why so many people Jailbreak their iPhone/iTouch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[The vast majority don't jailbreak their phones. Sure, maybe the percentage is high in the Engadget crowd, but if you're an app developer, the unlocked market is tiny and not profitable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[BRAVEHEART: "Freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedommmmmmmmm!!!"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Atra Nox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 4:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Marin<br>Which is, among other reasons, why all Jailbreak apps are free....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Smileypanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple is just trying to cover themselves. It basically a 'you play nice<br>and we play nice agreement". But, do something wrong or piss us off <br>and we'll nuke you. With all the sue happy sobs running around how<br>can you blame them for covering themselves. <br><br>They are not out to screw anyone, they just want protection from those<br>that would screw them or harm their users.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[just missing that usual engadget sarcasm... :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NeoDarkSaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[The best article i've read about this subject so far.<br><br>That really really sums it all up, apple needs to wake up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paperless]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[They cannot just "wake up".  Such authoritarian behavior is in Apple's DNA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WickedEast]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 10:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[also, they will probably never "wake up"....<br>that has got to become an old trick first, then they can simply "awake" and it'll be soo revolutionary...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam H]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 11:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[And we wonder why M$ is still around!!! Cant we demand for something better than these dillweeds?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R Nair]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 26th 2008 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would be nice if they would allow applications to run in the background too. My Windows Mobile phone with 128MB handles dozens of applications running in the background to keep me updated and informed. Guess what? I have zero slow down and can play games any time I want.<br><br>The iPhone / iPod Touch has beefier hardware than most WM phones. There are no excuses just incompetence and ignorance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ditto.  I am stuck deciding between the Touch Pro and the Touch HD.  I am on T-Mobile, and I'm not that concerned with 3G as it probably won't reach where I live for at least another year.  I have a Dash right now that I really like, but I just want a faster CPU and microSDHC support.  I was all set for the Touch Pro until I saw the Touch HD in action.  Mmmm...<br><br>I do like the iPhone in terms of hardware, I just hate the OS and the people that make it.  :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Student Driver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[My fiance had a T-Mobile Dash that absolutely sucked if you ran more than one program at once.  I blame Microsoft, though.  When I had my iPhone Jailbroken, I could run all kinds of apps in the background and it was fine.  It did drain power faster, though, which was one reason Apple didn't want background apps.  I think their decision was a little too strong.  Instead, they should have a "Background Apps" menu in the settings.  Any app the user authorizes to run in in the background can.  Any app that isn't authorized will close.  By default, new applications will be set to close on exit.  That would allow users to opt-in with known consequences, and allow the non-power users to keep the current behavior.<br><br>The only app I have that I would authorize at this point is Pandora, but some of the location-aware social networks like Loopt would benefit greatly from having this feature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just a quick question.  How do Apple know if your app is malicious?  Do you have to submit source code for the revue?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, you give them the source for review, once approved they build your app from that source<br>for distro on the app store.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/09/25/engadget-cares-save-us-from-apples-groundbreaking-developer-s/</guid><description><![CDATA[And sometimes "malicious" can mean "Your app is clearly much better than ours so we are gonna reject you but steal your source code and make our own."  Ugh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 25th 2008 2:36PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
