<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Subscription required?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it's thicker than a MOTOFONE, I'm not interested. <br><br>They could make this G-Phone a third as thick as the current G-phone, and I *still* wouldn't buy it.  <br><br>Thin is in, Google.  This isn't 1999.  Get with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[A cheap Chinese company manufacturing for Moto.... yeah I don't think it's going to be hi-res.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[As opposed to the cheap Chinese companies who build all Apple's products?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[which Apple products? the high res ones? Yeah let me know when you hear about them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 4:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mike<br><br>The difference being this is an ODM aka they DESIGN *and* manufacture the products. Apple, on the other hand, designs and engineers everything in house and simply uses contract manufacturers to build and assemble all of the pieces.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 4:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really wish Android would be stuck to high-end, quality devices like the G1. I'm afraid of it ending up like Windows Mobile, with cheap and slow devices giving people a terrible impression of the real power it has. But, open is open. Nothing we can do about it if we end up with some really crappy phones running Android.<br><br>-D<br><a href="http://www.androidboards.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.androidboards.com</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 12:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh god I know what you mean...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyHeadisFed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[If more people think like you, we'd still be paying $4000 for 386 computers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[d00b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 2:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm, well if Android remains a fast, stable, highly extensible, highly customizable Mobile OS, I PRAY it goes the way of WinMo, what with its ubiquity, large developer base, and availability on many providers and handsets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Trevisol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on TechFaith hard at work on Android device, not saying who it's for just yet]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/09/techfaith-hard-at-work-on-android-device-not-saying-who-its-fo/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Danny<br><br>Ignore the turds like this "Ryan" guy -- they obviously don't get it. Windows mobile may be ubiquitous, but that is only because most of these manufacturers didn't have a viable option until now. The windows CE core is bloated and inefficient, and the current windows mobile 6.1 interface is a throwback to the late 90's compared to Iphone/Android/Nokia Tablet OS. Based on it's plummeting marketshare, I think most people agree with me, although HTCs attempt to "paper-bag" it with TouchFlo has extended it's execution date a bit longer...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2008 5:01PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>