<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't know they were making chips that looked like quarters now... cool!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wulile]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 3:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[1 Gbps @ 20$... wow.. thats something i have been craving for..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vibhor goyal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 3:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you're expecting 1Gbps raw throughput, you'll be sorely disappointed. That's not to say these devices won't be awesome though - if they do a good job of implementing it, you will probably be able to achieve a steady 100Mbps over a reasonable range. Antenna quality plays a big part in this though, and that will be dependant on how much the integrators decide to spend on them.<br><br>Of course, the most interesting statistic would be power consumption - using my N95 8GB's WiFi kills the battery pretty quickly. I've no idea what chipset it uses though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[j_g_puff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 5:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[how does one "install" one o this things?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[webon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 3:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[It would (I assume) be sold to companies that make end-user products (laptops, wifi cards, routers, etc.) and they would integrate it into existing products or build new products around it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 3:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[Swallow it... Uses body heat for power. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[i feel i shouldnt get hardons for a wifi chip.<br><br>i guess i can't argue with hormones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 3:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a HUGE quarter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yoni]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 4:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice coin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Str1ker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/15/quantenna-promises-to-boost-wifi-signals-with-new-chipsets/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Samboini]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 15th 2008 3:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
