<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[and queue the comments about a particular part of this photo...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowdef]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[nice pears]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[A blurry shrubbery!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[can u blame em?  ap-pear-ances are important.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jaalin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[The X-Ray monitor needs re-calibration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowest Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[i believe i meant cue]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowdef]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll take the girl (as long as she isnt underage) and not the tv. white isnt my favorite color. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Das Boot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[@lowdef: maybe there will be so many responses we will actually need to queue them also.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brokenkeyboard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 2:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is my monitor calibration off or does her leg look like it's decaying.  Zombies legs ahh!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[linuxamp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know my comment will be off topic but I have no idea who else I could ask.. :p<br>I am looking into buying a monitor that is between 22-26"..<br>My friend told my if I want it for games, 2 ms response time is a must have..<br>So far the best screen I have found is the following Asus;<br><a href="http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=10&l2=89&l3=550&l4=0&model=2220&modelmenu=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1=10&l2=89&l3=550&l4=0&model=2220&modelmenu=1</a><br>Is there anyone here who has used Asus screens and can tell me how well they do or if they suck?<br>And is there any particular company I should look at?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://prad.de/en/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://prad.de/en/index.html</a> for your general and specific info on LCD's]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I could recommend to set dual (2) Dell Refurbished E228WFP 22-inch 199$ each. Fast, good comments from users and cheap. Call to ask for free delivery.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexandre Emond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Forgot the link: <a href="http://outlet.us.dell.com/ARBOnlineSales/topics/global.aspx/arb/online/en/InventorySearch?c=us&cs=22&l=en&lob=MON&MODEL_DESC=ALL&s=dfh" rel="nofollow">http://outlet.us.dell.com/ARBOnlineSales/topics/global.aspx/arb/online/en/InventorySearch?c=us&cs=22&l=en&lob=MON&MODEL_DESC=ALL&s=dfh</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexandre Emond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would not recommend the Dell E228WFP, it is a TN screen. Cheap poor quality picture]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[TN screen? Yea um how bout you look up what that means, all it is is a type of LCD tech., how does that make it shittier? <br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display#Active_matrix_technologies" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display#Active_matrix_technologies</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mdeguzis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 5:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[she's cute.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikon131]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Her legs look like she's been a victim of domestic abuse. Or just really bad choice of hoses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spam_free]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 11:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought garden hoses and fire hoses were my only option for beating. What are the better options?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowest Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[you gotta go lead pipes. ill never go back to hoses thats for sure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lowdef]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Engadet: Could you please add a new tag: Sexy Korean ad.<br>Every LG and Samsung pictures of recent new gadget could apply.<br>I may be weird but i find those yellow pears very feminine. I also enjoy the fresh look of the girl.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexandre Emond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not exactly sure where to start with this one, but I would first suggest a nice walk outdoors. Half of the planet is female, for your, easily-satisfied appetite.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowest Ranked]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would suggest that he try the produce department to satisfy his appetite.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NHAnimator]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can see half a mellon to the left of the screen... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iEye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Look at that you just touch the screen lightly on the top left corner and man you can see pears for days... Incredible Thanks Samsung]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[streached pairs and purple bruised legs? Possibly the worst advert ever i agree.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Kilgariff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 12:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those legs have panties on them, and you should have seen the picture on it before they photoshopped in the pears, they hired 4chan by mistake you see :P<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[The photographer and the art director responsible for this should be fired.  She has nice features, but the lighting is horrible, the image on the monitor is horrible, and her wardrobe makes he legs look 70 years old.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraigJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[In some cultures menopause is hott]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RiddleMeThis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Riddle: The menopause is hot in most cultures, I believe. It's all part of going through the "change". Like a caterpillar changing into a butterfly, but the ugliness coefficient is reversed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rufus White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 1:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe those are just wide pears...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nomi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, the pears on screen look stretched out. And white? I want the borders of my screen to be as invisible as possible. If someone really wants to impress me, I would love to see a borderless screen. Or at least an ultra narrow border of 5mm or less.<br><br>This monitor is about the same as a dozen other Samsung LCDs and other LCDs. Why is it news worthy in white? That is directed at Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 1:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought we abandoned white monitors the same way we dropped beige computer cases like hot bricks?<br><br>I mean who wants a white monitor sat on their desk, especially given the fact in a few years it will be beige.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeWard1701]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I feel compelled to say Beige (and white) rules, regardless of today's 'whims'.<br>Beige Appreciation Society member representin'<br><br>Black:<br>1) dust far more easily seen<br>2) positively cooks if a bit of sun hits it<br>3) absorbs too much light at night from desklamp; we can't have relative darkness<br><br>Frankly I see no advantage to black / graphite grey / fake silver-based machines.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekdroid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 22nd 2008 12:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone mentioned a TN screen above?  TN is just a technology for active matrix displays, how does that make it inferior?  O.o  Do your hw .<br><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display#Active_matrix_technologies" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_crystal_display#Active_matrix_technologies</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 5:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung CX-2233GW monitor impresses us with... nothing, actually]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/10/21/samsung-cx-2233gw-monitor-impresses-us-with-nothing-actually/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ProfessorKaos: TN screens tend to have worse viewing angles and poor colour reproduction compared to S-IPS panels.  Their benefit is fast response times and cheapness which is why most consumer PC screens use them.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frozenghost]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 21st 2008 7:17PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
