http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/ Engadget Comments for Official RED Scarlet and EPIC pics are sure to induce drool [Updated with OMG] http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 1:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 4:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 4:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 7:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
this is a cinema camera. not something you carry around for fun. the teasers and hype seem to have aroused gadget people, but this isn't a gadget person's camera. it is in the neighborhood of an XLH1 or EX-1. in no way is this meant to be a "shooters" camera.]]>Nov 13th 2008 11:54AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
ex-1 records 1080p.

these record anything from 2K to (as it was announced just now) 28K

That's everything from 4 megapixels to 260 megapixels.

Way ahead of the ex-1.]]>Nov 14th 2008 4:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
But seriously, it appears to be a modular SLR body.]]>Nov 13th 2008 1:50AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.redgrabs.com/up/1226630652.jpg

And this suggests it can take two of them:
http://www.redgrabs.com/up/13th9.jpg]]>Nov 13th 2008 2:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/modular or not... lets see some image quality comparisons... D3 beating ISO or E-3 beating autofocus speed?
I don't think so...
So my dear RED camera, strut you stuff and let me drool ....]]>Nov 13th 2008 5:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 5:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
True. But as there's no existing term that better describes this new wave of mirror-less, interchangeable lens cameras, "SLR" has to due. ]]>Nov 13th 2008 6:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
http://www.michaelsmith.tv/2008/11/13/red-announcement-holy-crap-this-is-great/
]]>Nov 13th 2008 6:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/I know what you mean. With Cameras like this and the Panasonic G1, It's getting harder to assume good camera = dSLR. I suppose they are still dSL cameras, just no R. dSL...I could get used to that.]]>Nov 13th 2008 10:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 14th 2008 2:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:30AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 2:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 10:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:41AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
15-25/2.8? Sweet. Gigantic, but sweet.]]>Nov 13th 2008 3:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 3:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
It's 2008. Please update your gallery code so we don't need a full page refresh when navigating through images. Google "ajax" for help.

Thank you]]>Nov 13th 2008 4:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 5:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
*wanders off*]]>Nov 13th 2008 4:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
Anyway, to me it just looks ugly. But since it's a professional tool maybe the looks don't count that much.]]>Nov 13th 2008 4:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
However, since the "brain" with the full frame sensor is $7000 alone, how exactly is this a 5DII killer in that regard?]]>Nov 13th 2008 4:57AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 5:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/

3k is crazy, but most of my projects are SD let alone going to film out or digital theater.


Still this is the camera to own! Screw Panasonic, Sony, and Canon they have weak sauce.]]>Nov 13th 2008 5:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
"sauce is weak" who the hell talks like that? do you work in a greek deli?]]>Nov 13th 2008 11:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
$ 12000 doesn't even seem that much to me.]]>Nov 13th 2008 5:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 5:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
But for everyone else in the real world? Not so much. A nice idea. But 100% impractical to compete with dSLR manufacturers.

Sure, interchangeability is nice. But at that cost, I could buy a new top of the line camera every year and still come out ahead.
]]>Nov 13th 2008 8:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 8:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 8:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 8:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 8:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
Can someone explain how people store these kind of vast datastreams.]]>Nov 13th 2008 11:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/
While RED certainly deserve kudos for their cine cameras, as a DSLR, this is impractical from many ways.

Relative to a DSLR

1. It's big
2. I assume its weight is like its size
3. It's expensive (dSLR FF cameras range $2700 - $8,000) -- this thing will go, what, $20,000 dressed up?
4. "no mirror"? Fine, Canon just have to revive their 'pelicule' design from the EOS-1n. (semi-silvered mirror, 1 stop of light loss to the sensor, 4ms shutter delay (v. 40ms or so for mirror raising SLR's). Canon are king at DSLR noise. The loss of 1 stop at the sensor will not be missed.

I'm happy RED are jumping in. Nothing like competition to keep everyone on their toes.

By the time this thing comes to market, Canon will likely be at 28 - 32 Mpix (36x24mm) and at a much lower price, weight and size.

]]>Nov 13th 2008 12:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 6:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/13/more-red-scarlet-and-epic-pics-sure-to-induce-drool/Nov 13th 2008 6:55PM