<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[i like the clean look to it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pt0ne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like the clean look of your mother]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JerkfacedFed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[You JERK!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Game_playa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not a fan of the touch of color scheme. All black please, and we will have a winner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you mean the red Knight Rider bar?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iEye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[some kinda wireless technology so that you can use a samsung tv/monitor wirelessly. i mean think a bout it using a laptop on a couch browsing away on a 30-60 inch tv, no wires. and more colors. and i don't know if this is already included but a backlit keyboard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beta man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[They found the "13.3-incher to be "handsome," the performance "smooth" and the endurance to be satisfactory enough".<br><br>That's what she said.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[omfg so perfect]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[El Taco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chuckles McGee @ Nov 16th 2008 9:39PM<br><br>They found the "13.3-incher to be "handsome," the performance "smooth" and the endurance to be satisfactory enough".<br><br>That's what she said.<br><br>dang it mcgee, ya beat me too it! I was gonna say it to the title though. lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spacegravity4me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you really have to copy his whole post and put it in a new one right underneath? I thought that was what the reply button was for. But i would really just prefer you ranking him up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[dude, you know what, i don't even know why i did that, lol. i must have had a brain fart or something... kinda out of it over here. sorry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spacegravity4me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[p.s. thank you to the jackass that ranked me down for trying to correct a mistake i made when i was completely exhausted and had no effect on your life at all whatsoever... thank you, thank you very much for that..... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spacegravity4me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[kinda of subject but on the netbook nc10 ubuntu netbook remix option on a 16-32gb ssd for $400. and ubuntu on this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beta man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[*off]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[beta man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[That actually looks pretty nice. I like how Samsung is trying to be consistent with the design and colour. First the TV's, now the laptop maybe the next-gen MP3 players will look like it too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[holycow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[then the logo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[El Taco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[samsung never really makes a bad product. A lot of my electronics are samsung and the company doesn't disappoint. For example, i have a samsung 910mp monitor and it had to be replaced and samsung replaced it no questions asked out of warranty =D.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[you've never had a samnsung harddrive have you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 3:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol i have 3 and they've been great. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[very clean lines]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cybergypsy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[a bit overpriced, I'll be interested when it hits $659]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erv Server]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[it looks so so to me..................]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 10:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA['i' don't like the logo on the lid something tasty missing!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OCEAN 'CLAK' 20th]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 11:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like my toshiba u305 and specs are similar to u405.<br><br>No big deal. The devil is in the bugginess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gteken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2008 11:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was supposed to be for ocean/clak/whatever, stupid comment system. Apparently you can't reply to clak anymore? Maybe it's a "don't feed the trolls" feature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iofthestorm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very nice product shot.<br><br>Terry Thomas...<br>the photographer<br>Atlanta, Georgia USA<br>www.TerryThomasPhotos.com<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Thomas Photos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 2:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[I too would be proud if i took that photo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wootman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 2:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Get over yourself.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 4:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[what they should do is design a led screen that looks like the laptop screen (making it glossy of course) and then have 3 ingenious cables coming out, one that plugs into power, you could call it say.... safemag, one that goes into the displayport and on that goes into the usb, so you have more than one usb port on the whole laptop.<br><br>They should also think about making these out of one piece of aluminum to cut down on cheapness.<br><br>I should of got that apple job...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 3:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks pretty cool, kind of Toshiba Satellite U305 Family of 13" Notebooks finishing man....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vikram]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 4:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's Q310-34P laptop reviewed: not bad for a first try]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/16/samsungs-q310-34p-laptop-reviewed-not-bad-for-a-first-try/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, I'd just like to make a correction here. The first laptop I got was a Samsung Sens Pro 500. 486 with 150mhz, Windows 95 and 16mb RAM. So no, Samsung is NOT new to Laptops in the US. They were one of the first but they dropped out early. We got one of the first Sens Pros released for something like $5,000. I'm glad to see they've dropped their prices a little bit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MarkMichael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2008 11:07AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
