http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Nobody will buy LCD's anymore because everybody wants OLED. Companies will have to bring out OLED's.
Consumer does not buy because price is too high. Companies do not make profit. Reduce price. Consumer wins again!]]>Dec 3rd 2008 5:32AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 5:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 5:44AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 6:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/This is engadget. We are suppose to love each other.
I just don't understand.
Where is the loooove...?
LOL
Anyways, that's what good comebacks are for!
I burnt you seriousam7!
It's alright.]]>Dec 3rd 2008 6:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 7:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 12:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/
It's true, I saw this in stunning HD on Viddler.]]>Dec 3rd 2008 5:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 6:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 6:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/They are already possible for that.

They would probably need a normal LCD back too. (else you couldnt get black at all), but even combined they should be perfect for HMDs. (much lighter, no backlight needed, power efficiant).
I dont want bigger tvs, I want my AR glass's darnit!

]]>Dec 3rd 2008 6:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 8:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 7:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 7:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 7:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 12:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 7:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 10:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 7:07PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 9:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 1:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 2:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/
And you're making some pretty big assumptions on how significant the energy cost is to me or even that I care at all. Sacrifices must be made to have the best.]]>Dec 3rd 2008 2:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 3rd 2008 2:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/
It never did "hit the brakes." Jeez, we're now repeating this once a day here on Engadget.

Engadget got the story wrong "a few years ago". . . and has been referring back to their erroneous reporting at every opportunity since. Now twice in two days.

Canon continued to develop SED even as they were barred from releasing any products. They said outright that while they were not launching any products, they were actually refocusing development on reducing production costs. Engadget reported the exact opposite and reported that Canon was not going to release any SED products *and* had stopped work towards reducing costs. . . and had thus, stopped working altogether on SED. Sadly, Engadget continues to mis-report this based on that one mis-read article to this very day. And apparently there's no way to stop them from doing so into the future. They just don't seem to care.

Here's a link to my comment from yesterday explaining the whole, sorry tale.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/02/canon-cleared-to-resume-work-on-sed-tv-now-that-the-world-doesn/comments/15917453/

And yeah, I've tried to remain polite about it. But how long can you watch people who claim to be interested in facts continue to totally ignore an obviously valid correction (sent via comments, feedback forms, and emails) that continues to erroneously color, influence, and undermine their SED (and now OLED) coverage?

Engadget, if you're not willing to at least acknowledge that you got the story wrong and then compounded things each time you have gone back and referred to to it during each subsequent SED news item over the last year or two, at *least* please stop referring back to what is obviously flawed reporting and conclusions.

You guys got it wrong. Please stop making it worse.

Best.

H]]>Dec 3rd 2008 5:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/03/samsung-teases-with-50-inch-oled-tv-for-ces-scolds-us-for-carin/Dec 4th 2008 1:24AM