<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is there to say other than...<br><br>Woo!  I love the future!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Etaanaru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[the feature ftw!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kyle allen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 3:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[COME ON AMD! FIGHT AMD! GOO AMD! NOT BECAUSE I'M A FAN BOY BUT I JUST  WANT TO BUY INTEL PRODUCTS FOR LESS! YOU TOO VIA!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Techie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is great. With the proliferation of netbooks, more power efficient processors, the better. I can't wait for dual core atoms in netbooks. Now if only netbook manufactures actually put a decent battery in them so they can have more battery life than 3-4hours, which is hardly any different than larger laptops.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 2:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[Poor AMD....<br>---<br><br><br><br><br>How is the atom "notorious" for low power consumption. That's a good thing, not bad as far as I can tell....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AltairAntares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 2:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA["notorious" because they gave up (or barely matched) the processing power of Intel's previous gen chips used in netbooks. Unexpected for consumers who generally equate next-gen with a bump in speed.<br><br>Thomas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Ricker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 2:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't wait for this and OLED screens to become available and reasonably priced...10mm thin netbooks, yay!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 2:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[i just watched the fantastic voyage, and i have this hunch that there's a secret lab underground somewhere were they shrink electronics, so one of these days our computers are going to start growing back to their original size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kyle allen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 3:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[why do secret labs always have to be underground? it could be in the burj dubai for all we know...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kloo?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 4:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[or in Nauru!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kyle allen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call me when someone can make a GHz class x86 CPU that can compete with ARM's 0.18 watt usage.<br><br>Seriously, 212-555-0145.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 3:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me too.. 281 330 8004]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 5:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[while your at it call santa and have him send you one<br><br>5-555-555-555<br><br>first # is the country code]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cb88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[These are for just netbooks? We wont be expecting 32nm or anything for normal desktops?<br>Because that would mean another mobo compatibility change no?<br><br>Also how much of a difference in price would you expect since manufacturing is easier?<br>I didn't see too much of a change from 65nm to 45nm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pars]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 3:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel will re-release their Core i7 line as 32nm, that applies to both desktops and laptops (generally desktops are always the first to get new technology & process).  This will also be done with their Atom chips too, last.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TravisO]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[So at this rate I will be able to buy my future kids a "Last Mimzy" bunny with Intel Inside® in 2020 huh?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Duckworth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 6:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really want to see the MID formfactor be successful.  I'm sick to death of handheld devices (phones, PMPs, games) being locked-down platforms we merely "license" from the manufacturer.  I want a handheld machine I can tweak, improve, install my own software, etc.  Looking forward to Intel making this a reality next year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sugarhigh777]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[While we're discussing 32nm- what if someone just made a phone that could truly do what you said? Would you buy it or would you pass because of the smaller screen?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocoviper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 8:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel's 32nm chips ready for MIDs and netbooks in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/10/intels-development-of-32nm-chips-complete-ready-for-mids-and-n/</guid><description><![CDATA[@techie<br><br>like the caps lock, dontcha?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[silverblackvoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2008 11:24AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
