<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[but why?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mere]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA["bringing the advantages of touchscreens to smaller form factors"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neodorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I remember people said the same thing about the airplane.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[@fred: How old are you? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 7:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude, he didn't say he remembered WHEN that happened, just that it did.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too old to be carded . :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[i always read an article then guess who wrote it, flatley's articles are always the ones i get right, and they're always awesome]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaos Theory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I do that too. I usually can get Darren Murph's and Thomas Ricker's. I think Ricker's are always great.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[giggity!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chase]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[not a good idea]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FILA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Elaborate, maybe? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or uhhhh.... maybe the STYLUS needs to make a return?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZaxCG2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[That looks awesome! Props to Microsoft and ME. This is a very innovative idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingofdaberbz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[sounds pretty sweet to me. its certainly more practical than that keyboard with the keys on the back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slycooper_rocker (lorddshadow the amazing) [anti-panda death squadron force five]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 4:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA["High Tech Jewelry" sounds a lot like what MS would think is a good idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Watches are jewelry.<br><br>So are cellphones to most people.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[But.. can it play Doom?<br><br>On a more serious note, he *was* playing a FPS game -- pretty cool, but how would he control both the shooting and the moving with one finger?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[who said he had to use one? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[idiot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 10:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw this play Q3A when they presented it at UW this past year, actually.  Pretty sweet stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[notjoel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[electronic jewellery? wouldn't you only be able to use it on necklaces or something like that so you can reach the touch-pad on the back? then how are you gonna see and use the thing with it tethered to your neck? why would any other item need this? it just seems like making a solution then looking for the problem :-P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[j616]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude, why do you wear your watch so loose?<br><br>So I can touch the underside of the screen.<br><br>Badumpum!  Tish....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fanfoot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 8:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did I just see a guy imitate Goatse to navigate Google Maps?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[hope your back to wifi browsing on storm, now they ran new wire across the pacific,that darn bracken,,.wait bb storm no wifi hmmmhmm deedeedeee..I'm glad to see u not so angry,.y so serious?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shugg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[@shugg<br><br><br><br>ummm...<br><br><br><br>...wut?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[idiot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've seen this suggested on engadget and even other forums.It's not a bad idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow looks like microsoft has officially killed the iPhone,.so this the nanotouch,. I wonder if apple will now com e out with a device called the zunebox,.dee dee deeee]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shugg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL! that was so funny! hahahaha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gadget00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 9:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very Cool :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cybergypsy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I need a laptop,this iPhone don't play that video .sucks,.I need a cowon or storm,.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shugg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm using my iPhone right now and the whole site crashed on me 3 times just to see that the clip won't play.  I'm tired of this piece of junk (iPhoney).  Everybody makes it sound so great, but all I have are problems after problems with this thing.  I'M TIRED OF APPLE CONVINCING ME AND ALL OF MY FRIENDS THAT IT'S OUR FAULT IF SOMETHING DOESN'T WORK ON THIS PHONE(as if the product is so simple).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cg200313]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 23rd 2008 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA["...or high-tech clothing"<br><br>What?! Oh, yeah, because I'm always shoving my hands down my pants to play<br>with SOMETHING. Might as well give it a rest and play with this thing<br>instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[...but seriously, what the hell are they even talking about. I can't<br>think of anything off the top of my head that this could work on<br>besides electronic devices (cellphones, PMPs, tablets etc.). There is<br>just no way putting these in clothing and on jewelry is practical. Why<br>not call it how it is? A regular touchscreen has at least some<br>practicality for "high-tech clothing", but seriously, you would just<br>look like you were rubbing yourself in public all the time, and it<br>wouldn't even be easy to do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I could see clothing. Imagine you're in a Haz-mat suit (or even just a clean room), and you've got a little screen on your left forearm. Rather than obscuring the screen with your right hand, you touch the underside of the suit.<br><br>I'm always surprised when people don't immediately see a purpose that applies to themselves, they assume something is a bad / useless idea. Figure if they bothered to write that, they have SOME use in mind. MP3 players and cellphones are the obvious choice, and it'll hopefully find its way there too, but there are other places it can be used with MUCH better margins.<br><br>I hope you never have decision power in a company that does anything besides mass-market, mass-appeal, low-cost electronics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, Brad, but how are you going to touch the under-side of the screen if its on the outside of a haz-mat suit. Pull your  right arm of the the sleeve and shove it down the left arm sleeve so you can touch the under-side of the screen?<br><br>Plus, I was sort of going on what they showed when they said "high-tech clothing", which was  a hand-bag with some guy trying to lift the weight of teh bag with one finger so he could tilt the screen even to see it. That doesn't work.<br><br>Obviously I know that there are other things that it could be used for, but lets be honest, it's not going to be jewelry and clothing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you're saying to out the touch screen on the other side of the sleeve, that just wouldn't work very well. Because they aren't in near-perfect proximity to each other, it's hard to guess where to place your finger to begin with, and it would always feel a little like the calibration is changing according to how you have your arm bent (which would change the proximity between the two screens).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[dg, that shouldn't matter if your fingers were displayed on the screen.  If there is a virtual representation of your hand and fingers on the screen you are looking at, it becomes simple to guess where you should place them, that was really the whole idea with lucidtouch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[npChaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[it looks like it'd be really difficult to hold a small device like the one pictured, and to control it from the backside. if you watch the video you see the user holding the entire screen awkwardly with one hand and then using one finger to control on the other hand. it may work better on larger devices, but smaller devices would definitely need to be re-engineered to fit your hands differently before this would actually work.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[The video makes it clear that you'd have some form of severe pain/damage to your hands/tendons in 15 minute, suffering all the while to achieve that.<br>Back to the drawing board I'd say, sooner or later you'll think up something that works, don''t give up hope.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 10:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Definitely seems like the best way to control an FPS on a super-portable device...obscuring half the screen when trying to shoot stuff is pretty impractical.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tekd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 19th 2008 11:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA["virtual finger puppets"<br><br>...that sounds okay...as a noun....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 20th 2008 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft is on a roll... surface, win7 and this. very exciting]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sanriver12]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 20th 2008 12:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where have I seen this before..... ahhhhh APPLE...<br><br><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/05/10/apple_filing_reveals_multi_sided_ipod_with_touch_screen_interface.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/05/10/apple_filing_reveals_multi_sided_ipod_with_touch_screen_interface.html</a><br><br>Wonder who gets the patent ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oliver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 4:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you just broke that company's heart, and spirit.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 8:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NanoTouch: like your parent's LucidTouch, but now with more nano!]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/19/nanotouch-like-your-parents-lucidtouch-but-now-with-more-nano/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pretty cool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 10:55AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
