<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[new rule, all netbooks can only be up to 10.2 inches for screen size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to second that motion.<br><br>but engadget tells me this posting is a privelage, so <br><br>If engadget feels like letting me<br>If they've got the notion<br>May i second that motion.<br><br><br>Help, I'm supposed to be writing a paper! <br><br>I'm so screwed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Windzilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[@windzilla<br><br>google <br>write or die<br>and use that when you write a paper<br>helps me a crapload :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KAIKAI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think that Engadget is operating on the the assumption that netbooks are pretty much only good for, well surfing the net. Judging by this processor, I think that this would fall under the category of a netbook. Sure you can maybe hold some music and videos, but you aren't going to be running much else on it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hexoDAT64]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Take scissors, cut the internet cable.<br><br>Or if you are on Wi-fi, smash your laptop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobius_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are people so concerned about a tag like "Netbook"? If you'd rather call this a "fairly cheap subnotebook with comparably little processing power, no optical drive but likely good battery life", well, do so for all I care.<br><br>I'd rather see Engadget continue to call these things netbooks, even though they have bigger screens than most other devices in that category...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I second that, they better not start calling my MACBOOK a netbook. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joueboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA["but you aren't going to be running much else on it."<br>Can you name me more the average user is gonna do on a PC then?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 5:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ patrik<br><br>iTunes + Firefox (I don't think I can run it on a netbook and still multitask, especially with HD vids) or any other combo of quite resource-intensive apps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobius_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 6:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[how is the power consumption for via nano? I heard the performance is not bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[and $400]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[The original page mentions a price of 450€, which isn't that high at all, assuming that includes taxes. My Eee 1000H cost 430€ 3 months ago as well, just as an indicator.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[The NC10 is $500. I really doubt this will be $400. Maybe $600.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with roy. 12'' is supposed to be ultraportable, not a netbook. And not to knock Via, but why change now since nvidia is making a badass chipset for the atom?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AV-Logistics]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that really a successor? Seems more like something they would sell alongside, since 12" kinda goes beyond the netbook range.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dtwhite]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Roy<br><br>Tell that to avid Apple Macbook Air fans, and can you also add a minimum price rabge to your categorization of  netbooks while you are at it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheStupidOne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[...You know there's a reply button?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bill cant fart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Macbook air is a netbook? When did that happen? I thought rumors were of a supposed mac netbook coming. not that one was already out? Maybe i was misinformed? I mean it has an intel core 2 duo, and a 13.3 inch screen? I believe its in the category of sub-notebook. Where i think this one should also be.<br><br>The point of my first post is i dont really see this as a netbook. Its more of a depression ready notebook. I mean its cheap enough to still afford and will work for most of what of the world has to do at there jobs. Cept for us people reading engadget, on our dual 23 inch ACD's on our 8 core bohemoths, running crysis on the second screen just so our graphics cards stay warm.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Roy<br><br>'running crysis on the second screen just so our graphics cards stay warm.'<br><br>that made me LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GingerFox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHEN will the glossy black fiasco end?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cletus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed, matte surfaces PLEASE!!! The only thing on a notebook that should be glossy is the screen, and even then, give us matte options on that as well. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chin-Poh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1000<br><br>So tired of it.  fingerprints on every device i own.  plus it just looks tacky, fake "blingy".  was able to find a nice matte black battery cover for my HTC Fuze from the Euro version Touch Pro.  Made me like the phone 10 times more.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Glitter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[@myself<br><br>Btw, first mention of an Apple product in this topic for today! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheStupidOne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cut that price in half, and you got yourself a market...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex L.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[....actually then you'd have a huge bottomless pit that Samsung would be throwing their money into...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[schmitty338]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, looks nice and thin. Finally something without the typical Atom+1GB RAM+160GB HDD spec list too. Looking forward to this.<br><br>I love my Eee 1000H, but at times I'd love to have something slightly bigger, for the simple reason that a 10" netbook is kinda awkward to balance on the lap...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow... 12 inches. Does that mean my old Powerbook was a netbook?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bill cant fart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 6:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, your Powerbook was thick, fat and heavy and used a processor built for embedded applications. Everything a netbook isn't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why such a stupid processor?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[retardo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uh, VIA Nano processors have actually been reviewed to pawn Intel processors at some levels. Both processors are good in different ways. It's just the graphics I'm concerned about.. I'm waiting for Ion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Artix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 11:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would like to see something like the sony tx series (11"screen, built in dvd, roughly the same size as a 10" netbook), with similar specs, and a convertable tablet screen. The only thing that comes close is the kohjinsha sx3, but I find the 9" screen a little too small for my tastes.<br><br>Am I alone, or does anyone else think that the sony tx series is the perfect balance of form/size/function, etc. but could use a convertible tablet screen? I'd pay 1000+ for that, if the specs were decent enough.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yesitsfrankie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree but make it slate. Who needs a keyboard anyways?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can probably buy a TX for less than $1000. There was a deal on sonystyle.com just a few days ago where you could buy a TZ for $899. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[How does the 1.3 via nano compare to the 1.6 atom?? which is better? faster?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think any of us know, we're going to have to wait to find out.<br><br>I'm interested in what Via can come up with, their C-7 processors are awful compared to the Atoms. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chin-Poh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[The nanos are pretty close to the atoms performance-wise]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cesium]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[So when is an ultraportable a netbook?<br><br>If its screen is 12" you have to look at it more closely of course, but if it is reasonably cheap and using the same low powered "netbook" chips as the smaller machines, then go ahead and call it a netbook.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bebop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[12.1 inch screens are STUPID. Whats with the VIA CPU? Who paid them to put that pile of crap in there? Where is the dual atom? The real graphics? Netbooks will always suck until real stuff comes out. These lousy technology designs are just here to test the dopey early adopters. Get some real performance out of them, and then we'll talk. BYOTCHO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SPOKE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 7:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[That comment is wrong at so many levels, I don't know where to start...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DarkLight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 8:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[[sarcasm]<br>Congrats to VIA for releasing a product 7 months after "launch"<br><br>Rumor has it dual cores are being released by Intel and AMD.  Can we expect to see a dual core Nano by the end Obama administration?<br>[/sarcasm]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[w00fy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[It can't be a netbook if it has a 12.1" display.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric D.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 9:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[ASUS had better launch its ZX series ASAP<br><br>heard they are coming out in January]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[nice, i want to see what the competition has. the price could be lower]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ace587]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 21st 2008 11:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[this looks like a downgrade to me, slower processor and all. unless they kicked up the res on the screen, i'll stick with the nc10.<br>although they did improve the trackpad...<br>i still like my 1.6 atom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam kernes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[i know someone is going to say it anyway so let me be the first..<br><br><br>good thing i didn't buy the nc10.<br>just had that hunch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tj84]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 1:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[There might be an NC20 in the works, but the picture above shows a Samsung X360 subnotebook: <br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/samsung-debuts-x360-lighter-than-air-ultraportable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/28/samsung-debuts-x360-lighter-than-air-ultraportable/</a><br>I doubt that they]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni Borgetto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[... look identical?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gad Get]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 2:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ha, we couldn't tell the difference between a $700 and $2300 dollar computer?  Is that our mistake, or does it speak to netbooks' excellent designs these days?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mildoath]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 22nd 2008 11:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[Samsung NC10 get really good feedback from customers.  Read customer feedback: <a href="http://www.bestdealsonar.com/good-and-cheap-samsung-nc10-netbook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bestdealsonar.com/good-and-cheap-samsung-nc10-netbook/</a> and look at the VDO.<br><br>For me, Samsung has done a great job for NC10!! Great Battery Life, Excellent Size Keyboard, Better design than many other netbooks in market. <br><br>I think if Samsung still keep this strategy for NC20, I predict Samsung will also success with NC20.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2009 4:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's NC20 netbook: the predictable successor to the NC10]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/21/samsungs-nc20-netbook-the-predictable-successor-to-the-nc10/</guid><description><![CDATA[To me, a netbook is a portable computer that has enough horsepower to do basic tasks as browsing the Internet and try to keep an affordable price for the average user<br><br>A MacBook Air, as small as it can be, is not a netbook to me because it has a lot more horsepower and can handle multitasking with a lot more applications at the same time. Also, see the price..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m-p{3}]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
