<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey intel if your graphics didn't suck, then we wouldn't want an nvidia chipset.  *hates intel intergraded graphics* they are always horrible]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[digitallysick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tell em Steve-Dave]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 7:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[hahahaha, i love how you physically *hate* the "intergraded" graphics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[warrrennnnn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 8:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel should just buy nVidia. Just like AMD bought ATi. Now, yes - the AMD/ATi merger is/was bad news, especially for AMD since they basically lost SLI for the less-than-stellar ATi alternative.<br><br>But I think an Intel/nVidia merger would work.<br><br>Fact: Intel graphics suck.<br>Fact: nVidia is the de-facto graphics leader<br>Fact: Intel has very good QC and Fab processes<br>Fact: nVidia NEEDS very good QC and Fab processes<br><br>To me, that's a match made in heaven. Now all they need is lower prices!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[@MadMike <br><br>you know nivda still makes chipsets for AMD right?<br>just look on newegg...<br><br>so sli is still avilaable to the latest AMD prossers]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angelwolf71885]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uhhh, Crossfire works better than SLI...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abuzar Baloach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 10:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd rather see VIA buy nVidia (or the other way around), but that'll never happen :(<br><br>The only thing that makes VIA setups unattractive is that their integrated graphics are even worse than Intels.<br><br>Give me a VIA board with integrated nVidia graphics and i'll make a damn mess in my pants.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 11:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[It wouldn't be so bad if Intel was pairing the Atom with its latest chipest and graphics processors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 12:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, Intel is truly working on the graphics type stuff, but they're so focused on larrabee I don't think as much progress has been made in traditional integrated graphics.  I wouldn't be surprised to see a larrabee announcement with Apple's intro of Snow Leopard, since getting them into a standard Mac Pro would likely cement support from people like Adobe.  But, I felt like the timeline for larrabee might have been a bit too far off to be that optimistic.  A nice atom dual core with an efficient nvidia cpu would be a netbookers dream system, hd video playback and decent batterylife/performance.    ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[What we need is an additional graphics company, Intel just plain sucks, and Nvidia and ATI are a duopoly that basically make cards that are slightly better than the privious one.<br><br>We need a third company to shake things up. Maybe Microsoft can team up with someone to make things happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sea Urchin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 7:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[SIS and VIA make videocards..dx 10.1 compatable to boot]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angelwolf71885]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[SIS and Via may make video cards, but that's like saying that the Amiga OS is going to shake up the battle between Windows/Mac/Linux. He meant that a -real- third competitor is needed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rollins<br><br>well those are the only other companys that make laptop videocards<br>so its gunna have to be one of them...<br><br>now if your talking about for desktops then that company would be <br>matroix but thay make simmaler cards to the quotro series<br>so thay wouldent really do you any good...<br><br>so your still stuck with SIS and VIA<br>ide go with SIS bc thay were the first cheep $50 or less dx 10.1 glass supporting videocard]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[angelwolf71885]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 10:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously? You'd rely on Microsoft to get the job done right?<br><br>I needed a good laugh- thank you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 11:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Bryan <br><br>That would be stupid and hardly unlikely that Microsoft would get into Intel's affairs.<br>But lets say these OS does have a poison pill that stops certain hardware (Intel) from working with their OS:<br><br>Apple killing Intel support would cause Intel to loose its glitter being connected to a high profile product and a drop in its stock price.<br><br>Window killing Intel support would cause people to laugh at Window but cause Intel into (near) bankruptcy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 11:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Said that about two hours ago on the msi wind. I'm glad they're probably not blocking vendors. And yes I'm glad that what I said was wrong. The ion platform looks promising.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris120890]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[what happened to the highest ranked comments?  raise the ranking thresholds?<br><br>about the news, good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 8:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Doesnt Intel own NVIDIA? Like AMD owns ATI? If so, Intel is Retarded just like apple.<br>Whats the worse that can happen if the two work together? Make more money? expand the Netbook market? Not like its a replacement GPU, or their stealing your sales. Just like Apple. If OSX wasnt limited to apple machines they would have made a lot more money....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FLYING]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 8:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wikipedia confirms that no, no they do not infact own nvidia.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roflercopterer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok.... you've obviously just learned to read and write and therefore have made a comment without any understanding what so ever.<br><br>Intel does not own Nvidia. Maybe some shares of Nvidia, but not Nvidia outright. Nothing is wrong if Intel and Nvidia work together to make a better netbook from our standpoint. Their standpoint is, well, basic Nvidia graphics won't expand the market much, so why not make more money off each netbook by forcing everyone to user our graphics chip, because yes, it is a replacement GPU. Thankfully, Intel is under too much scrutiny for that to be truly viable these days. That and Nvidia has enough bucks to keep them in line in this case.<br><br>Apple makes profit off hardware, not OSX. Therefore selling OS X for all PCs would not net them any profit. In fact, it would probably lose them money. Next time you post, lay off the crack. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[If Intel owns nVidia, I'll eat my 8800GT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matt merritt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 12:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just... Ugh. Idiot, ahoy.<br><br>/Facepalm<br><br>I worry for the human race with idiots like these.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kizorblade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 5:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA["Wow" is all I can say to that comment; actually, it isn't... WTF are you babbling about?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[I though the title said "ant-lion"...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[renai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 8:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought the title said - "anti- what the freakinhell is this bullshit post about n who really gives a rats"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ohforfucksake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[You wouldn't know what in world Black Mesa is either, would you?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[renai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 10:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[why is geek.com reporting the exact opposite today?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steveborough]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 8:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice job noticing that! Perhaps they saw the rumors and posted the news on that instead?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wansoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[They probably catching up. This story has been around for a week. Notice engadget didn't post about it until now (even though I tld them a week ago) and  this story about the intel guy saying it's a load of crap only said it today.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris120890]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[well, geek.com is reporting that today (4pm)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steveborough]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[First, fweekin N-O-T!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ohforfucksake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[So like what is the mobo pictured up top and where can I get one?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Devin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 10:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me, too!<br>Looks like some sort of pseudo-Pico-ITX thing-a-ma-jig.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 2:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Without prices this soundbite "[Intel] sells Atom as a standalone processor, or as a package with chipset." is just zero-value information. Consider for example this hypothetical price list: Atom 60$, Atom incl. Intel chipset 62$. <br>Now of course you can go and buy the standalone Atom, not the package with chipset. Only problem is that the price of the standalone Atom is inflated (to make the package more attractive), and going with an alternative chipset is simply not competitive.<br><br>Now, I'm not saying that this is the way Intel's handling the issue, but the information that "of course we are selling Atom standalone" doesn't mean anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Toni Borgetto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 1:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually the way Intel keeps their hands "clean" is by the quota allocation scheme.<br><br>Intel counts the chipset's into your quota allocation. Those that buy just the Atom will get a lower allocation of chips than those that buy the Atom with chipset.<br><br>Is this anti-Ion or just being practical about distribution of a limited resource?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Motorola 3G Victim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 7:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Atom+Ion? I may give the netbook category a second look if this comes into reality soon (January 2009, at least?)<br><br>I always wanted a netbook with decent graphics performance. Intel, swallow your pride and admit your graphics chipsets are not worthy!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dax Cruz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 1:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[I call BS.<br><br>Intel HAS to say that it isn't blocking NVIDIA from putting Atom into its chipset.<br><br>If Intel bundles in a way which prohibits "fair competition" I think they would get into trouble with the law.<br>They are in the middle of an anti-trust lawsuit to begin with.<br><br>And I agree - I am waiting for a few tier 1 guys to launch some notebooks (netbooks?) with ION to really believe intel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[randomgyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 3:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[also, darren, <br><br>Ion = Atom + NVIDIA Chipset<br><br>saying Ion+Atom is kinda redundant. Also - inaccurate.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[randomgyan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't this along the lines of what got Microsoft in trouble?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[taciturnforsale]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 6:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel put the kibosh on anti-Ion hubbub, welcomes standalone Atom sales]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2008/12/25/intel-put-the-kibosh-on-anti-ion-hubbub-welcomes-standalone-ato/</guid><description><![CDATA[There are already netbooks with an Intel Atom and an nVidia GPU: the ASUS N10 has a nVidia Gerforce 9300m, and has for at least a month on newegg.<br><br><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220385" rel="nofollow">http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220385</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Egg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2008 12:04AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
