<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay, now I can have a big underpowered notebook too!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[I cant wait! I can replace my Compaq that i got for $400 thats has a dual core and a dedicated NVIDIA Graphics card so i can actually play REAL games with an underpowered laptop that uses WONDERFUL Integrated graphics and a processor that would be considered fast around 8 years ago. But at least i get a little better battery life!<br><br>I mean Seriously...Atom wont be any good without NVIDIAs Ion. Cus its totally going to kill their sales....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flying]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[atom isnt that slow, consider what we had years ago, this is very decent laptop, but the price has to be right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just put Win xp and I'll be happy.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let's hope Windows 7 is as good as Microsoft claims it to be, unlike Vista which wasn't as good as they claimed it to be. (FYI, I am using Vista and with current hardware and those patches and good compatibility from new software it is great)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobius_1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll let Bob Barker decide that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bill cant fart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 1:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is Atom THAT good? If e-mail and web browsing is all you need, PentiumM laptops from a couple of years back would be perfect. Is there any specific reason why anyone should insist on an ATOM?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hiroo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Much less power consumption, and thus better battery life?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes...but, I look at the battery specs of the netbooks and I don't really see huge improvement on battery life. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hiroo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Atom is pretty nice. It can run Vista pretty nicely on Netbooks as compared to the ones running celeron M 900MHz, which comes with EEE 700 series and EEE 900 (not 900HA). The question is the availability of the drivers by the manufactures]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamal DS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Atom is the new celeron....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ayle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Except Atom is slower than Celeron. Ugh. I don't understand the hype around Atom since when they first switched to Atom from Celeron M 900mhz benchmarks showed that at 1.6ghz it was actually slower. I don't understand why anyone would want Atom in anything bigger than a netbook since the battery life is more dependent on the chipset and Core 2 Duos are an order of magnitude faster and with similar battery life. I guess Atom is Intel's attempt to troll the market into buying shittier CPUs, which doesn't make sense to me since they had to do R&D to develop a worse CPU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iofthestorm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel should just start their own product line... Honestly, what part of the laptop don't they already manufacture? CPU, GPU, SSD, chipset, wireless chip, ect. I would love to see an Intel OEM laptop.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel classmate is a defacto Intel OEM pc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ever thought about the amount of battery life you'd get from netbook-specced hardware with a notebook-sized battery pack? I'd love a 13.3" laptop without an optical drive that can go 10+ hours on one charge... hell, I've been dreaming of that for years :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bemymonkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[With a 6-cell 6600mAh battery, you can get around 5-5.5 hours. For 7-8 hour battery life, you will need a 9-cell battery.<br><br>Although the EEE 901 can get you 6-7 hours battery life with a 6-cell battery (it comes with 6-cell), but it is not a notebook by any means. It has just 8.9" screen]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamal DS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats already available in Japanese laptops from Toshiba, Panasonic, and Sony. Some of their Core 2 ULV ultraportables with larger battery can get up to 8-9 hours with screen brightness turned down. Seriously look it up.. Check out the dynamism.com store. They usually have some good stuff... Its a Japanese electronics importer..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is the point of notebook if it looks like a 2005-top end, >12 inches laptop?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[The predictions are coming true!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA["but we'll see if people are willing to sacrifice performance without gaining portability"<br><br>I guess that depends on how much extra battery life they get, doesn't it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashley Stevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[The company I work for sells them in dedicated servers, they are selling like mad, and they cost us next to nothing to run.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Eric I am looking for a low energy server to just run two touch screen computers and was looking for an atom based solution.  Can you direct me to your business?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Digitaltrader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Onlookers, Eric has just demonstrated that you can actually promote your products here in a way that contributes to the conversation, generates business for you, and doesn't add the ugliness of spam to the blog.<br><br>In no way is it any less shameless or driven by self-interest.  Just less annoying, and here it seems to have worked.  Bless you, Eric, and happy New Year!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 2:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only if he actually sends me some info on where to look into these atom servers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Digitaltrader]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I know right.  I even clicked on his user name and followed the url but the website was 404.  <br><br>Swing and a miss, Eric.  Don't make customers beg you to sell to them.  They won't.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[I honestly wasn't trying to plug my company, and didn't really think that anyone here would be asking me for info on it :). I have updated my profile with the url, don't want to spam up the comments.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2009 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not just buy a current, low-end Intel Celeron M laptop.  There are so many 13" or 14" laptops that cost $500-700 that we really don't need a slower option for the same price (or more).   The battery life isn't much better in Intel Atom notebooks, but mostly because the CPU isn't the only component in laptop that doesn't use power.  Unless you combine these Atom notebooks with an LED screen for $700, these laptops won't offer much benefit at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow... I didn't saw it coming... /sarcasm.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Jones]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[atom is NOT the new Celeron.<br><br>Celeron = biggest load of fail ever to take integrated circuitry form.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GBeatzRecrds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't a Celeron more powerful than an Atom cpu?<br>The biggest difference between the two is the power consumption, but the question is if one looks at power/watt will the Atom knock out the Celeron?<br><br>Anyways I hate the Atom cpu, underpowered for my day to day needs, Intel has spoiled me with their Core 2's]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 1:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not true, Celeron is just regular Pentium chips with less cache, and now Pentium is Core2 chips with less cache. Atom is actually slower than Celeron FYI, so if anything Atom is the biggest and most successful failure of a chip from Intel. I personally think netbooks would be better off switching to ARM like Pandora (<a href="http://openpandora.org" rel="nofollow">http://openpandora.org</a> ) because they could get equivalent performance and much lower power consumption by ditching x86 completely. If you're going to run Linux on a netbook anyway, you don't need to be tied to x86. I would be really interested in seeing netbooks with ARM chips running Linux, now that would give you amazing battery life. The Pandora is projected to have around 10 hours of battery life, and that's in a tiny size but with performance close to Atom, so if they used some 1Ghz+ ARMs in a netbook size with a netbook sized battery we might see 15+ hour battery life, which would be amazing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iofthestorm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 3:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ iOf, i didnt mean fail as in terms of sales, i mean fail as in they've carried on a tradition of being pieces of garbage.<br><br>where my 2.8GHz Celeron PC with 256MB RAM runs XP like shit, while my 1.3GHz Pentium 3 with 512MB RAM runs it fine.<br><br>yes, the P3 has double the ram, but the Celeron's supposedtobe double the clockspeed and several years newer... what happened?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GBeatzRecrds]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[you never were the brightest cookie in the box, eh? <br><br>No matter how fast the CPU is, it cannot make up for the simple fact that XP needs 512MB of ram minimum to run properly in 99.9% of cases.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[f00]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 11:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[can Intel really restrict what OEM's do with their chips once money has changed hands? sure they can restrict supply based on availability, but dictate what size of screen an OEM uses? seems like the OEMs themselves would try to limit proliferation of ATOMs into Notebooks to be able to differentiate from Netbooks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HakujinSamurai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 12:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Somehow I doubt this will happen, but it would be nice to see the prices of 14-15" budget notebooks come down if they're using netbook components inside.<br><br>More likely, this is an effort by HP to cut costs while marketing these notebooks as "Energy Efficient".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fr0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[These had better be really cheap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh they'll be cheap alright. The devolution continues: laptop >> netbook >> crapbook.<br><br>And the real reason they are doing this -- we can't have laptops powered by excess cycles on the GPU, now can we?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 4:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Crap.  I do not understand the hype about about, less power is great but Atom isnt a real improvement in any case, the battery life isnt vastly diff. at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorKaos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 7:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Up and Atom!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 2nd 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Atom is a surprisingly powerful processor. When I finally got my Wind, I was surprised to see how well the Atom was able to handle itself, especially considering the low power usage.<br><br>Even when I OC it, I still get a couple hours out of it on a  3cell battery. Thats pretty good, then when you add in the low cost and the decent processing power, its even more impressive. <br><br>I wont be playing Crysis anytime soon, but I certainly can manage my daily tasks pretty easily. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Walters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2009 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[These ATOM processors are cheap pieces of sh1t that HP is u$ing to cut corner$. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JakeInDC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2009 4:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bingo. Intel is going to charge the same amount or more for these and they'll be making huge profits for a chip that is less powerful than the consumer wants. We're really up sh*t creek if all the notebook manufacturers start selling these in everything. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2009 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think you hit the nail right on the head there. It's a flat out con. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I think this is a great idea for people that cannot afford a larger screen laptop.  Intel Atom isn’t made for demanding applications, such as photoshop or something.  Its only really great for browsing the net, writing on Microsoft Word or any other type of application.  I even thought about buying a netbook, just to have around for when I leave home, I can write on my blog or check my email or something.  But I think its great if they get the atom cpu into a laptop with like a 12 or 14 inch screen and still be pretty cheap. <br><br>but its just my opinion.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make them bigger.<br><br>And half as thick as the Air!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 3rd 2009 6:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel Atom coming to larger notebooks?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/intel-atom-coming-to-larger-notebooks/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone who doesn't like this idea is not their target market, and should shuddup and stop complaining.<br><br>Choice is good.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2009 5:36PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
