http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/ Engadget Comments for VIA's low-power Nano 3000 rumored to rival Intel's Atom http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:04AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/1) learn to appreciate older asian gentlemen in 2009 versus younger asian lady of 2008
2) post more Meizu stuffs
3) think about enabling secretly-disabled editing privileges for user
4) more Tamagotchi mentions

;)]]>Jan 2nd 2009 8:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 9:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
The Asian Harvey Dent.]]>Jan 2nd 2009 9:36AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 10:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
I see your mental image and I raise you a visual!

http://addicted2fractals.deviantart.com/art/I-believe-in-Asian-Harvey-Dent-108170968]]>Jan 2nd 2009 10:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 3rd 2009 1:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:18AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 9:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
His eye always flinches when he says that. Good thing he doesn't work for Nintendo!]]>Jan 2nd 2009 9:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 9:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:27AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:33AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
Intel's current netbook setup utilizes a chipset that draws twice as much power as the Atom CPU.
If Via's Nano has the cajones to pull just as strong as the Atom does but using less power then yes, I can see it being a contender.]]>Jan 2nd 2009 8:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 9:39AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 12:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
VIA is not a slouch of a company - no chip maker is, really - but I think the damage was already done in a small way with the 2133.]]>Jan 2nd 2009 9:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/

By the way, that shirt with that suit its a no no.


]]>Jan 2nd 2009 9:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
This guy knows exactly what to do with it.]]>Jan 2nd 2009 9:17AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 9:55AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/as opposed to the (Intel) Atom's $70-90 range?!?
Hmm... ;@b]]>Jan 2nd 2009 10:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 11:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 2:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
Via will produce and sell the Nano 3000 dual core Atom rival.

It will sell 'alright', clocking more than the atom and able to handle a bit more, a few companies will jump on the bandwagon to sell it.

Intel will promptly release the Atom Core Duo (or A2, or something - which I'm pretty sure they have sitting around right now anyway).

They'll sell it cheaper, even by $5 at cost so that as many manuf. drop the Via from their lineup as possible (as noone is making variable cpu flavors of netbooks).

Voila! Via will need a triple or quad core chip because th A2 is being sold on just about everything.

Enter: Zii! Which will blow....our....minds. jk.]]>Jan 2nd 2009 5:59PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/
Despite the similar VIA-generated hype over the Nano, and some very generous (VIA-sponsored?) "reviews", the chip's market penetration was a big fat zero.]]>Jan 2nd 2009 8:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 2nd 2009 8:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 3rd 2009 6:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/02/vias-low-power-nano-3000-rumored-to-rival-intels-atom/Jan 3rd 2009 6:10PM