<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's the smallest mp3 player I've ever seen!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2009 12:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Surely I'm not the only one who thinks he looks like Bill Gates.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Funke, Tobias Dr.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2009 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was going to say that this was the ugliest "Asian girl" product demo I'd seen. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wodheila]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2009 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</guid><description><![CDATA[More VIA announcing crap they won't have or can't make.  I'm still waiting on that 1W Eden that was "released" nearly a year ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2009 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Say Cheese!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neoimp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2009 3:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on VIA's dual-core Nano still on track, but it's not the Nano 3000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/06/vias-dual-core-nano-still-on-track-but-its-not-the-nano-3000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sulu's crazy cousin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShogunMaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2009 4:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
