<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[um, sweet?  What's the downside?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bandigolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like the way you think. I'm thinking the downside might be their "anti-shake" is not true O.I.S. but some proprietary crap. Could be wrong. Also the video compression and quality might be so so. <br><br>On the upside my last Casio EXZ750 has OUTSTANDING battery life. Seriously took it to Florida for a week and used it every day. Never needed to recharge and it still had 3 bars on the way home. I don't know how they did it in that camera but I've had it for about 4 years and probably fully recharged it maybe a dozen times. I hope these cams have that "technology".<br><br>I'm still pretty positive about these though. That 1000fps sounds so fun. Wonder what the resolution is on that though. Their last 1000fps was like 176x96 or something...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[000000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 3:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make that about 3years. I had the z750 for about 3years. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[000000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[The downside is the added cost, and relatively slow (f stop) lenses. (I don't know why the lenses are slower, honestly.) They do have true CCD-shift IS. The only other downside I see is that the lenses aren't as wide as their other offerings, but it's a pocket camera so it's not a big deal.<br><br>I wonder if the 30fps burst is layered or consecutive? For instance, if the shutter speed is slower than 1/30s, can it still maintain a 30fps burst? I will ask around about this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[Self-correction: It looks like the FC100 has true CMOS-shift IS, while the FS10 does not. These model numbers are confusing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 4:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[So many sweet cameras these days, so little money...<br><br>So right now I want the following items set for 2009 releases (with est. street prices):<br>a) the best consumer/prosumer handheld HD camcorder ($800-$1100?)<br>b) EX-FC100 ($325?)<br>c) Olympus e-system micro four-thirds retro camera<br>d) Pentax k2000 (if it retro-fits to my old Pentax SLR lenses... I need to find that out)<br><br>Who wants to give me a loan?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bandigolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pentax hasn't changed their SLR mount in decades. So there should be no problem mounting your old lenses on a new dSLR. <br><br>Just be aware of the 1.5x crop factor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 5:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yeah... I believe they are also coming out with a Pentax to µ4:3 adapter... and there is already a Pentax to 4:3, which works with the 4:3 to µ4:3 adapter... so you could also use them on the Olympus. Though without any Autofocus (if applicable). The crop factor would be an even smaller 2x. And of course the the center of gravity is going to be right at the lens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 5:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Plothole<br><br>You obviously know a lot more about this than I do, 'cause I have no clue what you're talking about.  Can you point me in the direction of an online piece of literature that will explain what this "crop factor" thing is?<br><br>Cheers,<br>bandigolo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bandigolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_factor</a><br><br>The link above goes into greater detail, but basically it's like this: The sensor in all but the most high end dSLRs are smaller than the popular 135 (35mm) film negative. Because of that, the field of view you get for a given focal length is narrower. You can think of this almost like cropping off the edges of a photo. "Crop factors" are a convenient way to estimate how much narrower the view will be, by figuring an equivalent focal length that would produce the same view on film. For example if you multiply 50mm  by a crop factor of 1.5, you get 75mm. So that means a 50mm lens will give you roughly the same view as a 75mm on your film SLR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[The downside is that these things still have tiny little sensors inside of them and small lenses with high f-stops that dont capture much light: what you get is lots and lots of noise making for a very poor image quality.  Check out a Casio FH-20 review, then imagine its twice as bad.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rektide]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 13th 2009 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[The EX-FC100 looks pretty good. Anyone know the format and bit rate of its 720p video?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would assume the format would probably be mp4(.mov) and the frame rate around 30fps. Maybe 60 for 720p. That would be sweet. My z750 used mpeg(.avi) for it's compression and it has been the best I've tried since. Smallest file size to best quality to best editing capabilities.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[000000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 3:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[My main complaint about the z750 was it's non image stabilization. In any type of low light you WILL get blurry pics. That did suck.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[000000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks, but note I was asking about bit (not frame) rate...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm ready to sell my Exilim EX-Z65 right now and buy this beauty!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 3:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought my fiancee the 10mp exilim and indeed it is a nice travel camera, but the image quality doesn't even compare to any SLR I know.   The noise levels are WAY to high and the color can look very faded.  I have tinkered with all the settings, but it is just very difficult for such a small lens to take in so much detail and light.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[Compacts having faster burst rates than dSLRs is not exactly new. These cameras don't have to content with the mechanical complexity of an articulating mirror or focal plane shutter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[The have actually installed a micro black hole to the back of the lens so it ll be able to close even if its that thin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blastar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 5:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Casio's EX-FS10 and EX-FC100 compacts burst faster than your DSLR]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/casios-ex-fs10-and-ex-fc100-compacts-burst-faster-than-your-dsl/</guid><description><![CDATA[thats one disturbing avatar you got there]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 5:23PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
