<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[And once this thing hits the European market it's priced at $587, give or take a few dollars..  I hate European pricing..<br><br><br>You might ask how I know this. Well, here it is. The MSRP is set to $429.  What the sales people do when they introduce this device to the European market is that they drop the dollar sign and replace it with a euro sign and voilà! BIG profits and loads of green into someones already fat wallet while Europeans bleeds to the bone.<br><br>429€ converted to USD = $587.87   Coincidentally that sum converted back to Euro is 428.957. Go figure! <br><br>587.870 - 429 = $158.87 of pure extra profits. <br><br><br><br>1€  ≠  $1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 6:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is by far the UGLIEST thing I've ever seen. What is this ViewSonic, 1997?!?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[The LinkPC's form factor is kind of puzzling -- very chunky.  Mounting that behind a flat panel would result in a system awfully far from the wall.  Why not make it wider, but thinner?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 7:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, I don't think it is possible to care any less than I do about this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sbrown23]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[did they fired all their designers?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[I sometime really don't understand you people. There's nothing wrong with the way this netbook looks, at all! Every inch of that netbook is fully utilised, very true to form, no useless shiny lid, accents or what have you. <br><br>People nowadays are so hyped-up about having the "smartest" looking notebook, they start caring less about the functions anymore.<br><br>A lot of people would find this little guy very attractive, like business professionals for example (not that I am one). Personally I'd prefer a conservative looking notebook/netbook than a flashy one any day!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howdy Doody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 10:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unimpeachable]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[This isn't a new netbook, it has already been released by Epson in Japan for quite a while now. Info in my article:<br><br><a href="http://portablemonkey.com/article/viewsonic-jumping-into-netbook-arena/" rel="nofollow">http://portablemonkey.com/article/viewsonic-jumping-into-netbook-arena/</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Portablemonkey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 2:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[The world needs more laptops with the exact same specs...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 5:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ViewSonic launches Atom-based computing line]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/viewsonic-launches-atom-based-computing-line/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Cheng,<br><br>Either you or I seem to have a misunderstanding of how taxes work in Europe and the United States.  Let's assume for a minute that you live in Germany, which has a 19% VAT rate (on the standard-to-low end for the EU).  From what I gather, most MSRP's in Europe include the, so the actual untaxed price is €429-€429(0.19)=€347.49 or $475.47 at the exchange rate you've given. In the United States sales tax is added at the till, so here the pretax price is in fact just $429.  So the difference is actually $475.47-$429 = $46.47.  There is still a markup, but you've overestimated the profit you think they are taking by over $100.  What is left is a markup of 10% in Europe.  While some of this may be pure profit, I'm not so sure it is - it might cost more to ship things from southeast Asia where they are made to Europe than to the US (I'm not an expert about this so I could be wrong) and some of it may be to protect them against a sudden drop in the Euro against the Dollar before the retail can be adjust.  In any case, no one is forcing you to buy ViewSonic in Europe - so if you don't like the 10% markup, don't buy it.  I've never cared for their stuff anyway.<br><br>(On another note, sometimes companies do drop the number a little bit before putting a € in front.  So if they sold this for €399, the equivalent US pre-tax MSRP would be $442, or just $13 (3%) more at current exchange rates).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2009 6:18PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
