<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those suits are clearly made for chimpanzees. Lucky it's running Windows XP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrNuclear]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[#1  Those things have "pyramid penis" <br><br>#2 Would it not be more logical to make a "spacecraft"  capable of VTOL that could deploy and pickup a rover?  Or,  a spacecraft that could be piloted around, landed to collect samples and then make its way back into orbit?<br><br>Something like a Starfury or a Dropship?<br><br>You could keep in in Earth Orbit, docked with the ISS and refuel it using rockets from earth carrying fuel.   Possibly able to serve as a lifeboat if the ISS was ever damaged to the point of imminent destruction.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flashpoint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Flashpoint<br><br>In answer to #2, no. The fuel costs would be completely cost prohibitive, especially since you'd have to drag all that fuel up from the Earth's surface.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[with a big toilet looking thing attached to its back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[max654000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 9:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those suits strapped to the front, remind me of that one scene in Mad Max, when those guys were strapped to the front of that vehicle.<br><a href="http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a199/don_veto/mad_max/madmax.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a199/don_veto/mad_max/madmax.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vagrant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 4:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do all astronauts have FUPA's?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Ford]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 25th 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[So what happens if XP crashes or gets a virus?<br><br>Norton: Certified by the Space Foundation]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brandon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they aren't on the intertubes, they probably won't get a virus. Of course, the moon aliens may pull an independence day and hack it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Macha88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is to stop someone with a pringles can mounted to their wifi antenna from haxing the rover?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 12:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would really hope it's not still running XP when it launches in 2020 ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 4:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is truly a technological marvel, but I can't be the only one wondering if our astronauts really are sporting prism-dicks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[killermojo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 6:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's to make better contact with aliens sporting prism-vaginas.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[giuliop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[The penis is the driving force behind all space exploration. That moon is just one big, ol' pussy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 6:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[and some kick ass chuck taylors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[StalematE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[What no windows 7?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrise524]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 6:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice to see that when things are really bad financially we are still putting $18B a year into this stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Kern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suppose we could be spending that on contraception for teenagers.  Or on fighting marijuana.  Or on a museum of organized crime in Nevada.  Or on education for illegal immigrants.  Or on bailing out poorly run banks.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rodan32]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah seriously, why did we have to build this when we won't be going to the moon for 12 more years? If technology gets better over time, why are we constructing it now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cloud858rk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 9:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you serious? Didn't it cross your mind that the entire reason it won't be for 12 years is to allow time to design and build the spacecraft?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 6:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[those asstrounauts look pretty flaccid, does 0 gravity do that to you, if so I'm canceling my orbit trip ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[webon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Either people will bitch about it not having Mac OS X or will be all "Suck on that, Apple!"<br><br>Me, I'm just surprised that such an organization doesn't use GNU/Linux or some other Unix variant.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[???]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[NASA uses Linux, but I gues not in the Lunar Rovers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[feraligatr8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't worry - Now that Obama is in office, they'll have to switch to OS]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it's not Vista, anyhow; did you expect a pirated beta of NT7?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[NASA uses and used every OS ever made I think,  OS/2, amigaOS, w95, linux,  XP, and some you have never heard of, and home-written ones too for their 8bit systems.<br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope that isn't the production model.  To think I travelled all the way to the moon and had to stand on the back of this thing and not get to walk on it would just utterly piss me off.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[7egend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA["Dr. Smith, bring the Chariot around..."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[X]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[so what's the point of the two dudes slouching in the back?  seems like they can't move, they may as well just be sitting in comfy chairs inside the thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[notatoad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's something that NASA's recently developed called a "suitlock," an alternative to an airlock. The astronaut can crawl into the suit and detach/reattach directly, instead of having to construct a huge airlock and risk getting hazardous lunar dusk inside the living area. In this video you can see one of the astronauts detach from the suitlock, wave around a flag, and then march ahead of the rover:<br><br><a href="http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2009/01/todays_video_na_5.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2009/01/todays_video_na_5.html</a><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neuronexmachina]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's something NASA recently developed called a "suitlock," an updated version of the old-school airlock. Astronauts can climb directly into the suits and detach/reattach, instead of having to place the entire suit into a huge airlock and risk getting hazardous lunar dust inside the living area. In this video you can see one of the astronauts detaching from the suitlock, waving a flag, and then marching off with it:<br><br><a href="http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2009/01/todays_video_na_5.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2009/01/todays_video_na_5.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil H.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 10:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's how you'd suit up. The life support pack goes right over the spot you get in at, sealing up the suit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cloud858rk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 10:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the point of the suits in the back is, while the rover is rocked to the lander/base 2 astronauts can get into the rover with out a suit on (no room to move around inside the rover with suits on). They then drive the rover, several miles from the lander/base. Once they get to their work site they hop into the suits, which disconnect from the rover and get to work at the work site, off of the rover. Sort of a neat idea I think.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, I wonder what happens if you fart in one of those things?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those there are some mighty fine and well-insulated codpieces. Man, Neil Armstrong really missed out on some cutting edge tech.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DaveZatz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[XP - a better the devil you know philosophy, I suspect...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[That "step-in-the-suits" idea is pretty cool (and, I'm sure, essential for such a mobile transport in which every bit of oxygen counts).<br><br>Looks pretty cramped, though.  Imagine having to sit in the cockpit, looking out at the lunar terrain, nowhere to go, while your vehicle-mate is taking a smelly shit behind you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't they have step-in suits in 2001-a space odyssy, a movie from 1968?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 24th 2009 8:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whoa, in the future Depends are worn on the outside.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Astronut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[NASA means business with their chasity belt refresh. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Footloose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[first guy trying to get into those suits and slips, ripping off the door , kiss all their asses goodbye]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't low gravity also mean low slippage?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cloud858rk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 9:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[test]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[benderhatesyou]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a cool toy and all, but what do they really expect to find on the moon that they didn't the last time we were there? I know we've developed a lot of really beneficial technology in the space race, but these days I would think there's better uses for the vast expense than sending humans back to a desolate place we've already explored.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 7:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, I want to know whats beyond out Solar System, not whats in it. All we have is a bunch of lifeless planets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[feraligatr8]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think part of the reason for going to the moon is to test out equipment and methods before going to Mars. Also they can do all sorts of science that can't be done on Earth, or in orbit around Earth. I too would like to know what's beyond our solar system, this is just a first step so to speak.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 10:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[Clearly someone at NASA is a fan of The Road Warrior...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan Winsome]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think I have that same white grab bar in my bathroom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[formidable ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gbcoffee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is up with the penis nubs?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John from Buffalo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 8:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/a-closer-look-at-nasas-electric-lunar-rover/</guid><description><![CDATA[StarCraft + Electric Lunar Rover = Instant Win]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 23rd 2009 9:25PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
