<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[pretator will pwn an alien any day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[You mean PRE- dator]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vito]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, yes. Pre-dator vs iAlien. A classic in the making.<br><br>Here's hoping that they have a sit down, realize they are both infringing on each other and decide to agree not to file a lawsuit against one another. We can only hope.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[gah typo.<br><br>also, "Go ahead and skip the Flintstones, there's your irony for the day."<br>lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maveric101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[In fairness, I seem to recall the Predator snuffed it at the end of AvP to the Alien Queen and that it took some silly woman to whup her, plus it's corpse ended up with a Alien in it so that was a double embarrassment.  Mind you, it's probably not as bad as remembering a pretty forgettable movie...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[They both need to just shake hands and play ball.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Technically aren't they both aliens?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, but one's a CYBORG alien. <br><br>On a completely unrelated note, how likely is it that it'll be possible to install Android on the Pre without too much fuss? That would be perfect.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lawyer bird]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA["But invisibility has little meaning to creatures with no eyes"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple Innovates - Other Companies Rip It off - The Techno Race keeps getting better - Now Apple will Have to do something Ells incredible for as all again - the real question in the game of Technology and invention IS- who will you give your money too - the ripp off  or the original haha  -one of the reasons why i will never buy Microsoft products ahahahha --   - I am wondering If the Palm can take a drop - My iPhone has been dropped so many time - i cant believe it still works - I dropped my Treo back in the day once about 3 feet and the screen Cracked piece a junk ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Shugg:<br><br>Did you even READ the article?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dramamoose]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[So now we know why the Aliens have no weapons. Because the Predators patented all of them!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 7:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@dramanoose:<br><br>You're implying that Shugg can READ. So no.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 12:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Love the PRE-dator vs iAlien idea, but the tagline needs to be changed: <br><br>Whoever loses... the lawyers win.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 1:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does that then make the Nokia N97 Superman?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[haX0r]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 31st 2009 1:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with Katie on this.  I think both companies should leave this the fuck alone and let technological advancement run its process.  If it turns out that both phones really are aping each other in many ways, then they're just going to sling shit and settlement fees at each other until they're both left with chunks of money gone.  Besides, if every company has to come up with contrasting ideas, it makes smartphones as a general platform less accessible, for there isn't a universal set of ideas to grasp when using any device.  Hopefully this won't deteriorate into one of those "what could have been" stories, where the Pre has to be watered down until it's not nearly as awesome as it's looking, simply for the sake of legal fisticuffs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Deed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its ironic that Apple is so angry when they license so many patents form Palm.<br><br>Quite ironic.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orrett Junior]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am guessing you mean infringe on Palm patents. AFAIK Apple doesn't license anything from Palm. It really doesn't matter anyway because Apple could sue Palm, drag it on for years and put them out of business. Remember Apple is sitting on a multi-billion dollar warchest of cash whilst Palm is surviving on investor money.<br><br>Pretty crappy way to compete if you ask me but then again almost all the IT companies have played nasty at one stage or another.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[They paid huge bucks to license those patents though, or Palm would've sued already.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlekZander]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alek:  Not necessarily...  They could have been holding back knowing that this eventuality would come.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorv]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alek - I don't think you understand how big businesses use patents.<br><br>Most big businesses use patents like countries use nuclear weapons. They're a deterrent to stop other people attacking them. This is why Palm are confident that Apple won't sue - it would be mutually assured destruction.<br><br>Of course this system all falls down when patent trolls (the terrorists of the piece) stroll into town. Nuclear weapons are pretty useful against an entity with no tangible assets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your argument is plausible but considering that Palm has been millimeters from death for some time, I feel pretty sure that if they felt they had even the slightest chance to win a patent suit against Apple and make millions (to say nothing of removing one of their strongest competitors), they would've taken it by new. Holding back for this long would just be insane.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AlekZander]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[I reckon Apple must of known about those Palm patents. And used it's patents as backdoor leverage to get around them when developing the IPhone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adrian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if Apple goes against palm, whether the other big guys (microsoft, google, nokia) will join palm against curpentino.<br>This looks more and more like the "look and feel" apple vs microsoft lawsuit.<br>Apple won't go against them unless they are pretty sure they can win this.<br>The above apple patents seem to be more precise, while palm's have more to do with the os inteface ( where apple lost against microsoft in the past).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TitaniumMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Aaron<br><br>Thanks, that comparison makes it much easier to understand.<br><br>Explains why RIM kept getting raked over the coals(Patent Troll Terrorist), but other major patent cases are few and far between (Mutually Assured Destruction).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[THJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@TitaniumMan,<br><br>I am also seeing a lot of similarities to Apple vs. Microsoft. The main difference is, Apple lost because Microsoft already had a license to use Apple's GUI. It would be most interesting if Apple is able to win this time, but Palm's patents are going to make it pretty touch to achieve.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JM Palacios]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 9:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alek, we've seen the "let's sue our way out of death" strategy before -- remember SCO?  Aaron is right -- most big companies, including mine where I hold two patents -- use their IP portfolio defensively for mutually-assured destruction, to use the Cold War era phrase.  Any of the big tech titans could destroy each other through many years and millions of dollars in litigation, but it wouldn't necessarily benefit the stockholders.  Apple would be smart to let the Pre steal a few percentage points of market share, because that's far cheaper than defending a Palm countersuit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 3:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Aaron<br>you mean "Nuclear weapons are pretty useless against an entity with no tangible assets"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sid.watal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[DAMN I'M GLAD I BOUGHT AN iPHONE !<br><br>I want apple to succeed beyond success.<br><br>Put LG, and Nokia OUT OF BUSINESS !!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flashpoint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Flashpoint, do you TRY to get low ranked?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dishbreak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do patents work the same way as copyrights? I.E. you'll lose claim on a copyright if you don't actively defend it. If Palm hasn't already come after Apple, do they have a leg to stand on?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SenorK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[In reference to Flashpoint's comment as well as some others':<br><br>I swear this is the only site that makes me want to apologize for being an Apple enthusiast.<br><br>I love their products and I'll probably never buy a computer, PMP, or cellphone from another company as long as things stay comparable to the way they are now, but good lord, Flashpoint, you couldn't POSSIBLY have even read the article.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Correction: Shugg (up a few comments), not Flashpoint, couldn't POSSIBLY have even read the article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SenorK: Neither copyrights nor patents work like that. You're thinking of trademarks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[itsnotabigtruck]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2009 1:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally, an intelligent, in depth analysis of this issue.  There's so much CRAP online about this, like "Watch out, Microsoft" (seriously).  Thanks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, this is a pretty decent article. Thanks engadget.<br><br>Thengadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ahdok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thants for that subtle reference ahdok. It's just made my day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[j_g_puff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, and Ahdok, you seem to be affiliated with a company called PL. Do you know Playford by any chance? I believe he worked there a few summers back.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[j_g_puff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 12:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[This unbelievable, Engadget has actually done a insigtful and fair article... way to go... but i won't hold my breath on that because there's been other fair good articles Engadget has done but they they go back to drinking Apple Juice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, that was my thought too - nice to see a well-written article on the subject.  Thank you, Engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 2:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Definitely agree. I am linking this everywhere already :)<br>Thanks guys.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Exactly.  This article is why I read Engadget.  Ever since word about the recent "multitouch patent" broke, I've been looking for a reasonable legal analysis of how it would affect the Pre.  I finally have it.  Kudos to Engadget for an excellent article yet again.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theharmonyguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Move over Apple and fanb0yz.  There's a new Sheriff in town.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JozJonlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[And they shall call him "Pre"....!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lanejasper69]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 6:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[isnt it weird that the service bar/wifi and battery bar are not on the screen, but on the glossy black portion.<br><br>picture fail? or added feature??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Pre victory party has been postponed indefinitely.  Ed Colligan is gonna get knocked out when that 358 page patent report hits him in his arrogant, oversized head.<br><br>The end is near for Palm and the Pre will be the final nail in their coffin.  Apple has submitted a patent for use of the finger so Palm Pre users will need to use their knuckles to do any screen input.  Palm users have been knuckle-dragging for years and all those callouses will surely get in the way.<br><br>Well, Palm still has the Centro.  Maybe some new colors will increase its sales.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iphonerulez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 8:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[@adam It's a feature. The screen itself is rectangular; the corners are just black to give the illusion of a rounded screen. In the right light you can tell.<br><br>That picture, however, is an official press shot for Palm. I'm willing to bed it has been prettied up a bit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Cox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sweet review]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[compmd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</guid><description><![CDATA[At the end of the day, neither company has much to gain from filing suit; more importantly, it gets in the way of business. And since the two products are competing for discreet buyers in the smartphone sector (iPhone for consumers; the Pre for corporate customers), they'll just sit down and hammer out a deal. Or just leave well enough alone and say nothing else about the possible infringements.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sevenmack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 28th 2009 11:15AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
