<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[that sounds nice]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[geothermalcat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[NO lol for you!<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KAIKAI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a Samsung q1 ultra (with touchscreen), how do I get multitouch to work, or is it not possible on that device. (confused)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[To get the jump list, you can just select the icon and swipe upwards. the same effect can be achieved by holding on the icon with the mouse and dragging up. i just recently discovered this behaviour and it's perfect for touch screens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Proud Japanese]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[So its clear you can touch windows 7, but can it touch YOU?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ImaYam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[what like .....sexually ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KAIKAI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 9:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think multi-touch on a desktop is impractical.  Why on earth would I want greasy finger prints all over my 24" screen????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[--Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2009 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's some of the only complaints that I have about the current touchscreen capabilities of Vista (read: almost no abilities)........<br><br>Anything that makes it easier to use is progress. And did anyone test out multitouch in Google Earth?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike10010100]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mind that this is a Beta which Engadget doesn't seem to get. All touch screen devices uses different hardware so things will probably work better when drivers and compatibility has been sorted out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Homeboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[No.<br><br>Apple hasn't implemented it into OSX yet, so all other implementations are inferior until such time as when they do it. Mind you it will be exactly the same thing, but it will be billed as a "brilliant" usage of the concept.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Look_Around_You]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Using multi-touch on desktop or notebook displays is totally impractical... that is, until geneticists can make our arms longer & stronger ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[harvey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 5:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Homeboy:<br><br>I think it's pretty clear that they get the whole "beta" thing.  Maybe that's why it says "(for now)" in the freaking title.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UnixSystemsEngineer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.<br><br>So other than demonstrating some of the Engadget staff's technical incompetence what was the point of this article?<br><br>Anyone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who exactly has a big touch screen to use any of this stuff with anyway? How is the common person getting this set up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Stewart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's just another part of the OS for developers to work with. It's not a major selling point that's going to change the way you use computers. Touch screens are becoming more common and Microsoft just stepped in and gave everyone a base to work off instead of having 10 different third-party drivers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a 22" touchscreen all in one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sua]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tablet PCs, Ultra Mobile PCs, TouchSmart PCs... there's lots of them!   With a smaller screen, the buttons are bigger and much more touch-friendly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[there are more applications to multitouch than just touch (I know it's called "multi-TOUCH").  But ability of a device to interpret an analog input from the user is very limited.  Right now, all you have is a single point that you can move in x-y axis.  There have been many advances into 3-d mice (x-y-z tracking).   This allows you to move more than one point.  It doesn't necessarily have to be a touchscreen, a good example would be having TWO mice; one for each hand (once you have multi-touch, making the support for two mice would be easy).<br><br>Touchscreen is a little gimmicky.  The concept works for some things, and it definitely doesn't for others (TV are a definite NO, computers are questionable).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pretol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love how according to engadget, multitouch is a gimmic, but location aware APIs that apple is bringing aren't.  <br><br>Oh, and how theres no mention of Windows being able to do the same thing...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Persian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jesus Christ, it's always Apple with you guys. You just can't stop talking about Apple.<br><br>The article you mentioned was a RUMOR. Nobody at Engadget has actually used any apps that use location aware APIs in Snow Leopard. I'm sure once Snow Leopard comes out, they'll give it an appropriate review.<br><br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul A. Chapel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[no they said Windows Multitouch is a gimmick.<br><br>Apple have shown they are not bad at it, and MS promised a lot with W7 that hasn't been delivered. <br><br>Not MS bashing, i just think that apple have it nailed in terms of multi touch right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Oli<br>Find me Multi-touch or even stylus support in OS X that is even nearly as good as Windows, then talk. No, iPhone doesn't count, this OS actually has copy and paste.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lando Calrissian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think it has anything to do with who is coming up with the feature.<br><br>Engadget apparently thinks location-aware applications are more exciting than desktop multitouch. I happen to agree with them. We've seen some interesting location aware stuff on the iPhone, and it's certainly an area with a lot of potential. Multi-touch hasn't shown as much promise. It's great on small devices when you don't have the option of other input devices, but it adds little above simply making the experience usable. I haven't seen one iPhone app that I thought was actually better because of multi-touch (outside of Maps. Maybe).<br><br>Multi-touch looks good on demos where you can rotate pictures around and zoom in to maps, but really, how many times a day do you feel the urge to rotate a picture to some obscure angle with your fingers? What do you do with your screen once it's full of photos at weird angles? Take pictures of it and start again?<br><br>Unlike mobiles, desktop computers have a standard input system. Until I see some solid examples of how multi touch improves on them, I'm not convinced. Before that happens, it's a fancy gimmick. Location-based software, on the other hand, has shown promise in social networking applications, and comes "for free" (using existing hardware), so there's really no downside or barrier to entry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Windows 7 has location APIs too, why doesn't engadget rave about that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 7:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Oli <br><br><br>quote:<br><br>     "Not MS bashing, i just think that apple have it nailed in terms of multi touch right now."<br><br>ummmm ... i wasn't aware Apple had a touchscreen pc ... how have they "nailed" it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darthgault]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[On the other hand, Apple have only implemented multitouch on the trackpad of their laptops, and I suspect that won't change until they have a device such as a tablet PC and/or have spend a lot of time refining the gestures and touchscreen interface so that it integrates well with their current pointer interface. Because how well it's integrated will be what makes the difference between a gimmick and a useful feature, since people aren't going to suddenly switch over to touchscreens overnight or put up with a separate apps for the touchscreen etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Bell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 7th 2009 3:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[The reason that the keyboard may be difficult to get at is that they built on top of the Tablet Input Panel, which is easy to get at with a stylus, because when you track over it, it expands to about 5 times the size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lando Calrissian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also, you're not supposed to use that input panel with touch.  What you do is tap on a text field with your finger, then a BIG keyboard icon appears.  Tap that with your finger and the touch-screen keyboard appears.  The tabbed TIP on the left shouldn't be there for touch interaction (it can be turned off), and is totally unnecessary.  <br><br>If you really want that TIP to slide out by using the touch screen, you can right click the taskbar and show the TIP Toolbar.  That will give you an input panel button on the taskbar that will show the keyboard whenever you want it.  Very very nicely done.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Touch screen will ALWAYS be a gimmick to the common user and will only be useful in public situations. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ariez84]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I think a second screen (or third) with touch capabilities lying flatter on the desk next to the keyboard would be quite handy. Something similar to what a Wacom Cintiq would give could be great if it could use touch and stylus (but only at a much reduced price!).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sk2370]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd kill for a Cintiq 21ux right now, so would any artist. So no they are not gimicks. They don't serve much use for everyday windows tasks, but there is a large user base waiting for something like this. Altho I will admit, I see me drawing on the Cintiq, I don't see me draw on my monitor :). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FTY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2009 4:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know.. I tried this multitouch stuff, and i cant believe how tiring it is. It's like playing Nintendo Wii. <br><br>Exhausting.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[flowerpie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gorilla arms. Look it up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Spaceman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can change the size of text and other items up to 150% while maintaining the resolution of your screen in Control Panel\Appearance and Personalization\Display<br><br>It makes things easier to touch, highlight, etc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[untitled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are a fool!<br><br>First of all the Touch Screen Keyboard was designed for use with a pen. It's similar to vista! Not designed for finger touch.<br><br>The Task Bar also is not bigger for finger usage, it's the same size as default!<br><br>Worst video article ever on Engadget.<br><br>This site is going way downhill! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Garrad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well done. Engadget has gone down hill for the last year. You're only saying what we all know. I very rarely read half the posts from engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shattered Ice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed. I wish we could down rate articles.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shawnmos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[i blame the credit crunch]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[and terrorism!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[and global warming while im at it]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oli D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I blame Steven Gerrard. His volley just isn't what it used to be anymore.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ILoveApple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like that he referred to himself in the plural collective just like the rest of Engadget does in the articles....weeeird.  "Even though *our* handwriting..."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam K]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 6:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I totally agree. Multitouch is only a gimmick anyway (and even a mostly useless) and<br>it doesnt matter in which os, but engadget uses it to bash the Win7 BETA, since they<br>dont seem to find anything else that's not well done. (Must be hard for engadget that<br>apple will become the boring company again that it was before Steve Jobs came back<br>to rescue them...)<br>Looking at it positively: While engadget is going down the drain, we get a really good next<br>version of Windows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joewhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 6th 2009 3:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[You can make the taskbar twice the height to make it more finger friendly. Make sure it isn't locked and drag it up to double size.<br><br>Second of all IT'S STILL A BETA !!! <br><br>Why on earth would you want to use an on screen keyboard when you had a keyboard sitting there ?<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA["Why on earth would you want to use an on screen keyboard when you had a keyboard sitting there ?"<br><br>I could think of some situations, like some office prankster takes off with your wireless or USB keyboard.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kal326]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe you're carrying a Tablet PC during a walking tour/meeting and it would be impossible to use a two-handed keyboard since you need one hand to carry the computer.  Also, with the touch screen you don't need a keyboard or mouse at all.  Your computer can be mounted in the wall.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adamz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 6:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is not a tablet pc its an all in one touch screen desktop with a keyboard, hence my point about why use an on screen keyboard D'OH<br><br>And if work mates keep stealing your keyboard I don't think a multi-touch screen will stop you being a little bitch ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand articles about multi-touch (win 7, palm pre etc.). Hasn't Apple patented certain gestures? I'm not saying Apple invented them or whatever, but won't non-Apple people get into legal trouble for implementing pinch-zoom and all that?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DirtyVegas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well I hope they get counter sued back for crippling any sort of innovation]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Waveblade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/05/windows-7-multitouch-its-a-gimmick-for-now/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not crippling innovation, promoting it!  No, I'm serious.<br><br>Let Apple patent anything they want.  Then, other companies will be forced to think harder about their interfaces and designs... and hopefully, come up with something amazing that no-one would have ever thought of had they just been able to go the easy route.  Then they create a better product than Apple ever dreamed of, and it's all Apple's fault! :p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeoWulf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 5th 2009 4:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
