<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Security experts hating on Android browser until patch is released</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/security-experts-hating-on-android-browser-until-patch-is-releas/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Security experts hating on Android browser until patch is released</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Security experts hating on Android browser until patch is released]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/security-experts-hating-on-android-browser-until-patch-is-releas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/security-experts-hating-on-android-browser-until-patch-is-releas/</guid><description><![CDATA[The second update, the one regarding the mediaserver, makes more sense than the initial "it will own everything in the browser" bit.  Did he demonstrate HTTPS traffic being captured with this exploit?  Is the problem worse than initially reported, hence Google still thinking it's limited to the mediaserver?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Student Driver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2009 10:18AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
