<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm also surprised how the manufacturers are not embracing Android. So far, it's been all about Microsoft.<br>I guess Android has a long way to go to have market penetration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maikel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very disappointed so far myself.  Need more Android!<br><br>The most exciting thing for me was the news of the HTC Magic (possibly) being released in Europe.  This may mean that it actually will be released via T-mobile in the states sometime this year.<br><br>Why arent' more phone makers jumping on a free, open OS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff.hodgeman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably for the same reason MS have dominance on PC's instead of Linux.<br><br>Because its easier, quicker and everything is already there for you. You can pump out phone after phone in quick succession, just look at LGs promise to deliver 50 handsets by 2012.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adderz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA["Probably for the same reason MS have dominance on PC's instead of Linux."<br><br>Microsoft has more money to throw at vendors?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andir3.0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Honestly I think Google is getting the reputation as a company without much focus who might drop a product/service without warning or leave it to die on the vine. I think Android is probably suffering a bit as a result. I could see how it might be hard for a company to jump in when Google is being very careful to hedge their bets themselves and continue to focus heavily on the iPhone platform for new services/features. Makes you wonder how committed they are. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinister Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[does iphone os have good penetration.,?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[philosopher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 9:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[«does iphone os have good penetration.,?»<br> I think it does, since some people seem to have it up their a55es.<br>/joke<br><br>Sorry for that, but you just left it for pickup.<br><br>Seriously, I don't think there's a real do-all, fit-all, whatever-all in any product, even less in OS territory. UI design can be changed and perfected but core functionality not only has to be solid, it has to be «predictable» as well as documented. Android it's portrayed as an excellent environment for programming, but it's really young. Apple's iPhone OS is better acknowledged, by adopting pre-existing languages inside OSX, therefore opening the platform for their fellas, but then again: it's just one device.<br><br>Windows Mobile can perform better or worse, it depends on modding, tweaking, etc. There's a lot of tinkering inside and can be refurbished entirely. Certain actual shells can perform feats that are as iPhone-worthy as the next, and even reduce to almost none interaction with the WinMo's old and 90's styled interface.<br><br>But, of course, that needs a special kind of user to be true.<br><br>I'll wait and see the WebOS, which is kind of fun since in spanish webos is the way you pronounce «huevos» (eggs, which is used to describe a man's balls) so we Latins could say «Este Palm va a tener unos huevos barbaros!!» (this Palm will have a lot of balls)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boolean22]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 10:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[The truth is that none of the manufacturers want to be Google's beta-tester. Android is currently a swiss cheese OS and there's lots of functionality missing. <br><br>Once it's feature complete and relatively bug-free, I'm sure more manufacturers will join the party.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 3:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't forget there are all sorts of privacy concerns associated with Android that don't exist for any other phone OS.  That will turn off lots of people that aren't prepared to hand their lives over to Google and the OEMs know it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 5:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really don't get all the Android fanboyism. Why? It's an OK mobile OS, not as good as (tweaked) WM, a little better than Symbian and it's made by Google and that's it.<br><br>Why are you all so excited to run ad-ware on your phones? What about having Google search adn index all of your text messages is so freaking appealing? There's no reason to think that Google is any more capabale at mobile OS software than, RIM, Apple, Microsoft or anyone else. They only thing they are better at is search alogrithims and advertising.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[breaklaw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 5:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I disagree.Symbian has stolen the show so far this year.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iLoveApple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shattered Ice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[How?? You mean OmniaHD and Idou? Hmm... that would make sense... but I think both devices were not so much focused on the OS like the Windows Mobile stuff.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Poom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shit, I missed the part about the Omnia HD being a Symbian phone. Barring any major Android revelations, I think I've found my next mobile. Samsung, please let that thing do UMTS on the freq's that Rogers and AT&T use. PLEASE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravnos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple has stolen the show... because the iphone is still better than all of this garbage]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSuburbanWhiteBoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed, OmniaHD and Idou are lightyears ahead of every WM device showed... And SEs S60 shell looks amazing and it DOESN'T LAG. HTC didn't launch "super-evolutionary" TouchDiamond2, it launched an ugly version of Touch HD...<br>What's with Idou being vapor-y? What is your basis for that assumption? What are you, paid by the goverment to advertise american stuff only?<br>And DEAR GOD, WM 6.5 dubbed "lagOS" is going to be available by the Q4, that's like a year from now, how on earth is that any kind of a win?<br>I own a Touch Diamond, and I kinda like WinMo, but let's be realistic...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kching]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[HTC Touch Diamond 2 preview...so far it looks better than anything seen during the show ( other that the Omnia' HD sexy screen..but we haven't seen abything else on it besides a video and mobile-review.com critical preview...) and it's gonna be available soon :<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4HQvKVVYi0" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4HQvKVVYi0</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ike Turner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 9:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I actually love the Touch Diamond2 design a lot...<br><br>Idou and OmniaHD still own this year's MWC though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Poom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[While the iPhone will continue to be the favorite of teeny boppers and college kids, these latest releases guarantee that it will move even further down the wishlist of everyone that wants a powerful business phone.<br><br>Face it, the iPhone is really dated at this point.  Innovative in its day, sure, but take a look at it now:<br><br> - It's half-VGA resolution is basically second tier now that all the cool kids are doing full or wide VGA<br> - It's lack of a physical keyboard has always been a drawback for business users<br> - It's lack of certain basics like tethering, MMS, and autofocus, is just pathetic in this day and age<br><br>I hope Apple has something up its sleeve for this year or next, because pretty soon even the kiddie crowd will start looking elsewhere for their next phone/toy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 10:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[d,<br>people may want a powerful business phone, but i wouldn't go so far to say that the iphone is "really dated".  its still decent. <br><br><br><br>and why have no other phones came out with capacative screens, i know they take asia into consideration, but still it can be done.  I think i can only name two, the iphone and the g1. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 12:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA["While the iPhone will continue to be the favorite of teeny boppers and college kids, these latest releases guarantee that it will move even further down the wishlist of everyone that wants a powerful business phone."<br><br>I know that was flamebait, but I can't resist.<br><br>I almost laughed out loud since I sell these products everyday and hear so many business users glow over the iPhone's features, interface, and best-on-the-market web browser.  No, Opera Mobile isn't better, even on a battery-chugging beast like the Touch Pro. <br>I see people ditch their Blackberries daily and not look back.  <br><br>Tethering, MMS, autofocus?!  While these features would be nice, they're more of an afterthought since most business users have aircards for mobile internet, email will one day replace MMS, and autofocus doesn't help a plastic lensed phone camera.<br><br>Look at the competion.  Windows Mobile, no matter how many nuclear powered bricks you run it on, just plain sucks.  It's a jumbled terror to navigate for daily use.  I used it for a year and was ready to through that device out the window.  Blackberries are very nice.  They have lots of useful features and the interface is quick and efficient to navigate.  That said, they lack horsepower.  With all the java action going on, apps don't have the low level hardware access they need to give a rich experience.  The web browser (and by extension, html email) is weak.  The iPhone has an elegant interface, tons of horsepower, and practical everyday uses.  Hell, I'd love background apps, copypasta, push notifications, MMS, ect.  But truthfully, the iPhone wins even without these features.<br><br>I've used the Blackberry Bold, HTC Touch Pro, and iPhone.  The iPhone is what I carry.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 2:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, Jason, but you work in a phone shop, we work in corporate business.  Our needs are somewhat different to yours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 8:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[i just hope that touch diamond2 is the topaz that was leaked w/ an AT&T logo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[i H8 Front Facing Cameras]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shattered Ice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was for iLoveApple]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shattered Ice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[bs thee's not more Android phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crawdad689]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's only 2 more things I want to see.<br>1) A Dell Phone<br>2) SPB Mobile Shell 3.0]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisaroz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mobile Shell 3:<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWzppakWPLI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWzppakWPLI</a><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2AOukFSz5o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2AOukFSz5o</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ike Turner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dcoaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, definetely expected more from Android, but I don't think it's as great as it is touted to be.  The future Windows Mobile 7 and  the new Symbian Open Alliance os seem to be what coming, with last versions of them coming out on some handsets.<br><br>What I want to know is where are all the Nvidia Tegra handsets and mids, it has been a year since they showed us the working technology, c'mon I want one asap.  I managed after much searching to find more info at this site: <br><br> <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/02/closeup_view_of_nvidias_tegra_wmc.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2009/02/closeup_view_of_nvidias_tegra_wmc.html</a><br><br>They say Nvidia have a handheld Android prototype that was on display.<br><br>Come on Engadget give us some video demos and more info on Nvidia Tegra.  <br><br>Hope to see this Toshiba with Qualcomm Snapdragon tomorrow, that thing is pooowerful.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wesley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[nVidia doesn't have anything new to show. The Android prototype is just the same as the WM one (they can dual boot) Same demo, same interface. Qualcomm is killing nVidia right now. Qualcomm's offering is the whole package (2D/3Dchipset+IO+GPS+Radio etc) nVidia's Tegra is just the CPU+GPU. Guess what's probably cheaper for the ODMs....<br>Vid of nVidia's Booth : <a href="http://www.mobinaute.com/258162-videonaute-presentation-nvidia-tegra-puce-anti-iph.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mobinaute.com/258162-videonaute-presentation-nvidia-tegra-puce-anti-iph.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ike Turner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[thats one of the best headline in ages. and winmo 6.5 does look quite nice.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Salman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed that it does look nice. But WinMo REALLY needs an overhaul, sooner rather than later if they wish to stay competitive in the mobile market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dcoaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder how many people know that Android is almost entirely customizable? Apparently not many manufacturers/carriers do...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Padilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have you maybe thought that customizing Windows Mobile is easier than Linux especially if all you have done is Windows Mobile development?<br><br>In addition there is the whole tie into Google with Andriod, which requires that you basically have a google account.  While Windows Mobile does encourage you to use Hotmail/Windows Live or Exchange, you are more than free to set your primary email account to AOL/Yahoo/gMail etc...  From the get go it is more customizable.  I think to seriously try to beat the Windows ecosystem, people need to develop something that isn't so tied down.  But the only revenue Google can see from Android is not thru licenses like Windows Mobile but thru potential use of Google services plastered with adverts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LJKelley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes I have, and you make a very good point about that. I am not a developer (far from one), but I don't think that--if you had the wits and manpower--it would be too hard to develop for Android. I'm not saying it'd be easy or simple or painless, but I'm saying that it can be done. Now, I can't speak for the Android community, since I don't have a G1, but from the looks of the lack of manufacturer/carrier support, not too many developers are jumping on the Android train, which is unfortunate.<br><br>What I'm saying is that Android has a ton of untapped potential that no one seems to be desiring to harness on a large scale.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Padilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[maybe it because the manufacturers realize that Android is a half baked product who's only appeal is freee and _future_ potential.  I'm typing this on a G1 and I will be honest.  I'm unimpressed by Google progression on the platform.  The damn dialer is sluggish on ending and dialing a call....the dialer!?<br><br>While I'll NEVER use an iShit I will be considering something else this fall unless something drastic happens on the Android front]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 9:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android does NOT require a Google account.  The G1 does, but any manufacturer is free to realease a phone running a build of Android that has absolutely no Google services on it whatsoever. Microsoft could theoretically release an Android phone that requires a Live.com account if they want to, and it would not be an unrealistic amount of work to do (I am both a C# .Net and Android Java developer).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 10:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Android is customizable but customize it too much and you break all of the third party apps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 3:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think some serious props are in order for HTC, once again dominating the high-end touchscreen spectrum for the 2nd year in a row.  Palm what?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bandigolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Huh? What did they announce that's better than the Samsung Omnia HD or SE Idou?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 3:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man those HTC Diamond 2 and Touch 2 looked quite impressive, too bad about the slow old 528mhz processors.  Should have used Nvidia Tegra chips - much faster, much much more battery life and awesome graphics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wesley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or Qualcomm's Snapdragon.  I'm very surprised that we haven't heard more about that, especially after Toshiba's TG01 announcement from a couple of weeks ago.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 5:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Gotta love that "HTC Debug Tools" icon... free with a WinMo purchase? ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol... it's funny because it's true.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bandigolo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[ha you beat me to the punch ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Finnschi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 9:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's amazing that it's MWC 2009 and no one has filled all of these must have's in one device....<br><br>3" or larger WVGA capacitve touch Screen<br>3 to 5 Megapixel Camera with flash and video<br>3.5 mm headphone jack<br>Mini-usb charge and sync<br>hot swappable flash memory<br>stereo bluetooth<br><br>This should be an obvious set of requirements....<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed. Why the hell hasn't someone done this? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't necessarily agree that a capacitive screen is essential but the Touch HD covers all your requirements with the exception of the flash and the resistive screen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 17th 2009 5:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/16/mwc-day-one-the-empire-strikes-back/</guid><description><![CDATA[Typical - Microsoft muscles in with vast amounts of cash and tie-ins to push a competing product (a better one to use, in most people's eyes) out of the market. Again. Remember netbooks and Linux? Seriously, if Google has the money, they need to push massively now or lose their market share like Linux did. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Nicholls]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 16th 2009 8:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
