<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[So where's the new TX-2??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[exNewt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a TX1 before. but the body/button/lcd_panel is too small.<br>Then I buy a Panasonic TZ1... TZ1 is good, but slow focus and too noise.<br>Then I buy a Fujifilm S2000HD...  I found it's too big for me, and poor image quality.<br>I am looking for my new camera... Panasonic TZ7 looks very good, but really expansive. <br>My new target is SX200IS,, I think US$350 is a good deal for me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, ChihCheng]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I got to say that the SX200 IS is a very interesting model. Folded optics giving us 12x zoom on a super compact camera. And its 720p HD video support is pretty high-bitrate too (at around 16 mbps I think). If only we had an option for 24/25p frame rate too, more precise focusing, and shutter speed control. Then this thing would fly as a secondary, video camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eugenia Loli-Queru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 5:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Panasonic DMC-ZS3 is gonna eat this Canon for breakfast I'm afraid. Movies at 720p in AVCHD Lite, Dolby Stereo & probably similar photo quality.<br><br>Canon, you just got F'ed in the A.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[peestandingup]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Couldn't they have used a pink color on the plastic of the two "lips" on the lens cover?  So it doesn't look all gray?<br><br>BTW, that lens cover looks very much like a vag]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flashpoint]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I find it confusing that you assume a real life girl could possibly be the reference point of this person.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfticket]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 6:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://img.photographyblog.com/products/canon_powershot_sx200_is_09.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img.photographyblog.com/products/canon_powershot_sx200_is_09.jpg</a><br>That doesn't look like folded optics to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisk1590]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[All I'm seeing is a 403 error.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[For those that are curious<br><br><a href="http://www.photographyblog.com/index.php/weblog/comments/canon_sx200_is_hands-on/" rel="nofollow">http://www.photographyblog.com/index.php/weblog/comments/canon_sx200_is_hands-on/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 12:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Samboini<br><br>That comment was WAY over the top ugly . . . even for Engadget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[online]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[the canon eos 40d is still better -<br><a href="http://www.techreviews4u.com/2009/01/25/canon-eos-40d-photos/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techreviews4u.com/2009/01/25/canon-eos-40d-photos/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TECHMADDY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[It goes without saying that a dSLR is going to be at the advantage overall. P&Ss still have their place though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 19th 2009 8:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not photography expert, but why are the lenses so small. I mean sure they're smaller on P&S than on dSLR, but the N86 Nokia announced has a 22mm wide lens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hamza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 12:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[A large part of the reason is the sensor. By using a smaller one, you don't need as much glass in front of it. Of course smaller sensors have their drawbacks too... poor low light performance for one thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 1:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon's latest batch of cameras get the hands-on treatment]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/19/canons-latest-batch-of-cameras-get-the-hands-on-treatment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make every shot a powershot.<br><br>I am fans of Canon, is cheap (in comparison with a Nikon), bring nice features, uses decent processor, uses conventional memory and take good photos.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Magallanes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 7:58AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
