<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[First Fake Fail iPhone Crysis Doom Blend?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fanboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's funny because only one of the words you said could really describe your own comment. No, it's not "blend".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Metkis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[he might now appreciate your enigmatic comment, metkis. just tell him bluntly that it's "FAIL"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kangbp.nyc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[He'd appreciate correct spelling even more.  ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorDex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like a pumped-up version of Creative's X-Fi series mp3 playes.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[With a little hacking, you can make it play MP3s, doom, and maybe Crysis. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (BarCODE)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 2:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unable to import settings from old remotes? That's weird, that's something they did do in the past. I remember the option in the software.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GvanLee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[My settings were (mostly) successfully transferred when going from a Harmony 880 to a Harmony One.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am 100% sure that you can import the old remote settings because I DID IT!!!!!! Engadget should revise that! There is a button in the software that says "Have a new Harmony remote?" then a button that says "Replace Remote" . I just switched from the 670 to the 1100 a few weeks ago. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://picasaweb.google.com/crisss1205/Sample?feat=directlink" rel="nofollow">http://picasaweb.google.com/crisss1205/Sample?feat=directlink</a><br><br>picture of the "Replace Remote" button]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Cris T the 1100 was unable to import the settings from a Harmony 520. It even forced me to create a new login to the setup software, so I now have two: one for my 520 and one for my 1100. I have upgraded Harmony remotes in the past and been able to carry over devices and activities quite easily, so was surprised (and frustrated) to find that it couldn't be done here.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TimStevens]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've got a Logitech Harmony One. It's a terrific remote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheMagnificen7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Same here. Absolutely love the One.<br><br>Upgraded from an an 880 after 4 years of use before the volume up button stopped working (It had been dropped quite a few times on hardwood floors in college).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yousty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[agreed.... the harmony one is a great remote (and arguably much better than this one since it has a touch screen and real buttons) while being far cheaper than the 1100.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just bought a Harmony One myself, and I love it as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ronzo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just upgraded to the One myself. Had an 880, loved it, but the wife didn't like the tiny buttons next to the screen (and the device and activities buttons were a bit too well hidden around it as well). "Gee, honey, if we get this more expensive touch-screen remote, you'll like it much better...". So far it's been fantastic, and I really like being able to add favorite channels to it, just wish you could add custom graphics to the other screens, rather than just text. Got 2/3 of the price of the One back when I sold the 880 on ebay...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elvis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I feel that this would require 2 handed use for a lot of the options.  I'll stick with my old 880 Harmony.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Harmony one .. Period  suckas]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it better than the Harmony 1000 though?<br><br>I was going to ask if it would blend but I actually had an interesting question to ask...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JDEdward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought a Harmony 1000 last spring after my 890 suffered an accident and ended up returning it after about five days of use.... I was kind of frustrated by the second day, but decided I wanted to give it a chance and see if I could adapt to it.<br><br>The 1100 looks like an incremental improvement in the design, but of course suffers from the same overall design issue that made me box up the 1000 and go running back to Future Shop to exchange it for another 890. Sadly, as cool of a device as this looks to be, it's seriously lacking when it comes down to strict daily usability....  I generally don't see the point in a remote that you have to look at in order to access even basic functions, combined with the fact that it felt far more fragile than any other Harmony remote I had used.<br><br>I've since upgraded my Harmony 890 and 880 units to a pair of Harmony One's, and couldn't be happier, particularly since it overcame the charging issues that the 880/890 series had.  The touchscreen on the H1 took a tiny bit of getting used to, but wasn't a big deal since all of the remote's core functions are on the hard buttons.<br><br>I suppose for somebody with a basic setup the Harmony 1100 might be okay. For instance, I found it quite usable with my Apple TV, for instance, since I only needed the hard buttons to replicate Apple's six-button remote, but for things like controlling my PVR it quickly became downright frustrating with having to mess with the touchscreen every time I wanted to do something like skip a commercial.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse David Hollington]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[cool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just get that bluetooth support in a lesser model, Logitech.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Denver_80203]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd like to see the comparison of the 1100 vs a 1000 and other harmony remotes. <br><br>Does the touch screen really make a better remote?<br>Is the price for the 1100 make it worth not buying a 1000 for 300?<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eMax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[No, the touchscreen does not make a better remote.<br><br>I bought the 1000 and used it for all of 10 minutes before promptly boxing it back up and returning it.  Just as the review states, it's pointless when you have to take your eyes off the screen to look at the remote in order to do anything.<br><br>Epic Fail!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorDex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good point. I still don't understand what's the difference between the 1000 and the 1100 (except the color of the case)...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oufdu75]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I called up logitech the day it came out and asked them what was the difference and the sales person told me there is no difference but the design and the color.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cris T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[For me, it does make a better remote. The reason is that all the stuff I've got has so many features that need specific buttons. Binding those features to plastic hard buttons would work, but I am one of those people who can't stand the thought of pressing "Prev. Chan." in order to display PiP or launch the in-built mediacenter.<br><br>That's why I got the Harmony 1000, which solves the problem by letting me add any command I want complete with the right label. <br><br>However, the Harmony 1000 still somewhat sucks. The remote is really slow and the menus experience serious lag - so much that I often whip up the original remote to do what the hell I was trying to do with the H1000. It's so slow it defeats the point of having a universal remote.<br><br>The other problem is customizing. While this has gotten better on the H1100 compared to the H1000, it is still not very customizable in terms of on-screen button layouts. In addition, the resistive screen is all but responsive, making tasks more tedious than they should be.<br><br>The last problem is output lag. The remote isn't as quick as an original remote, ever. And mind you, this has nothing to do with the IR delay settings in the desktop software (which I've played for for hours). It's just not quick enough, which is extremely frustrating when adjusting volume or navigating long lists, e.g. the EPG.<br><br>But I will still buy it, because there isn't simply any other remote than Harmony out there that does the job for the same amount of money. Until I get a Pronto Pro, this crap will do.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundmark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the Harmony 1000 and absolutely love it... i picked it up with the IR extender for less than $400.  It did take a little time (about an hour) to set the system up the way I like it and then a few "tweaks" here and there to get it perfect but it was well worth it!<br><br>I would definately recommend this to anybody (just don't pay full department store prices for it... go with an online place that you trust).  The remote works better than i thought it would.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is it really that difficult for Logitech and the other universal remote manufacturers to incorporate bluetooth into their universal remotes? I watch more movies on my PS3 than I play games and have been holding off on buying a universal remote to get one that features Bluetooth support. I don't want the Nyko work-around, I want Bluetooth!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ketel1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Would it have been really difficult for Sony to have used something industry standard to control the PS3? Why should everyone else have to pay for their (and your) mistake? Nobody else's remotes are using bluetooth, and my Harmony One controls my Xbox 360 just fine...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elvis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[HARMONY ONE - hands down the best remote ever made - has both the functionality of buttons as well as a cool azz touch screen that is very easy to use.  The programming is simple and there are updates available (firmware) for FREE.  Not always as fast as i would like but it really isn't a problem to every once and a while plug it in and walk away while it updates.  Also, it is rechargable at it's base and has great range for those of you who need to be 30 feet from the 102" plasma to view.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought one of these just to see how well it was. Took it back the next day. It wouldn't properly control my brand new Samsung Surround sound receiver. I spent about 4 hours troubleshooting it myself, and another hour or so on the phone with Logitech's tech support and they couldn't get it to work either. Still looking for a universal remote, as I doubt any of the Logitech one's will work properly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stretch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the Harmony 550. It was only $55 new with shipping on eBay.  It has all the features of same features and same setup software these $300 remotes have minus the touchscreen or color screen. The blue backlight is plenty for me.<br><br>Using AAA for me is preferred. I don't need another charging dock sitting around my studio. Six month battery life ain't have bad either. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love my Harmony One and my wife hates it.  So, it's perfect!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[A happy wife, means a happy life.  Keep that in mind! :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorDex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suffered for six months with the Harmony 1000 before I sucked it up and returned it for the Harmony One.  As a basic "clicker" this style of remote simply does not work, especially combined with the sensitivity of the touch screen and the poorly laid out UI.  The 1100 looks like an incremental improvement, but I doubt it's enough to actually make for a usable remote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a long time Harmony user, and a prior Pronto user... and I see this as the Harmony for people who actually like full touchscreen remotes (few) and/or want the kind of customization that a Pronto offers (also few).  There is a high end feel and wow factor that a full touchscreen offers, but a day-to-day operational ease that's really lacking.  I was more than happy to let my Pronto go when the inexpensive 500 series Harmonies were first released, and I'm happier still with my 720.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IsleOfMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[heh, the last pic is uncanny... I have 5 of those remotes.  360 harmony, Aquos TV remote, Scientific Atlanta box remote, Onkyo receiver remote, 360 DVD remote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brazell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 3:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Bryan<br>For $40 more you can have the color touch screen of the Harmony One plus all of the buttons you have now laid out in an easier setup.  Also, who the hell wants to change batteries every year?  Where do you leave the remote?  Next to the TV?  On the night stand?  Just drop it in the charge base and you will never have to worry about it ever again - make life simple for Christ sake - also your post makes you sound like you may still have your motorola star tac and monochrome palm device going strong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Until one actually owns a touchscreen remote, they have no idea of how terrible it really is. Like cell phones, touchscreens are a gimmick, and this gimmick quickly wears out. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drewdoog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the Harmony 880 and love it. <br><br>Anyone else have problems with having it sit correctly in it's cradle to make contact for charging? I have to slightly tilt it for it to charge.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Timmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 12:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Off topic, but yes. I hade to replace the cradle to get it to charge properly. It's a common issue and is covered by the warranty.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundmark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 7:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[So this is basically a 1000 remote in black. This is one of the worst remotes I have ever used. What the reviewer did not say is that if you are left handed, usnig this remote is excrutiating. Its difficult to  hold one handed, and contrary to what he says, most commands are actually accessed on the right side. Volume, mute and channel change are by far used more often than the touch screen. I found myself holding it sideways.<br><br>I swapped mine for a Harmony One and havent looked back, this is a brilliant remote.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've always felt that these touch screen Universal remotes had it the wrong way around. Instead of controlling what's on screen, why doesn't the touch screen get used for the TV Guide/Cable Guide. I understand that I'd be bloody hard but it seems to be the logical way.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've had a Harmony 895 (stick remote, with RF relay thingie for stuff in AV cupboard) for a few years now and it is wonderful. Have TV, amps, AV switches, consoles, PVRs blah blah and my harmony just WORKS. <br>It's not perfect though and quite annoyingly the new versions don't seem to address the shortcomings - well apart from looking a bit prettier (895 is no looker).<br>First off it has to have RF (I now have stuff tucked neatly out of sight), secondly it has to be a stick remote - why on earth do I want a tablet I have to stare at to use? Yes it looks impressive, and I can see how it might be useful in a conference room - but on my sofa? Nope.<br>Secondly Logitech seem to be missing the 'good' bit of what they do. The RF stuff is shamefully overlooked now on anything other than the top end - why not make an IP enabled version. Imagine the 'harmony' box is tucked away in your AV cabinet with little IR relays pointing to all your kit and your remote - well there isn't one. There's a whole load of thin clients you can install on your phone, your ipod touch, your netbook, your PC etc etc. Seems rather stupid to pay extra for a fancy tablet remote - when you've already got many pieces of hardware in your house that are much more capable. <br>If they really wanted to push the boat out, do a deal with those SlingBox people - just suck the video feed out of your TV and let it be streamed. You could then control your entire AV system remotely and stream about your house with ease. Watch it when you're away.<br>Dunno - just seems with ability to stream video from a number of vendors, Harmony's ability to control everything from one little GUI (currently tied to a remote), something far more interesting could be done than 'Yet another f'in remote'<br>Just to finish on a bright note, Harmony have utterly wonderful tech support. I had a slight problem, called up and guy was fantastic. Instantly followed my gabbling, told me exactly how to fix it, then called back a bit later to check it had worked out OK.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[goldcd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 20th 2009 6:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[the reception is very average on theses babies. bad range due to the rientation of the remote.<br><br>Also, the ergonomics are a bit funky due to the two handed use.<br><br>A good remote, however, those two points could be considered a deal breaker to some. (i own one and would not buy again)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[steviedee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 1:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not Logitech's fault, but I really can't use a Harmony because a few of my devices use the same command to turn the device on and off, rather than have them be the same command.  So having a push button device selection that turns on the new device and turns the old device off just isn't going to work all the time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JeffDM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 6:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please sir, clarify.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lundmark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 9:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>It seems that most people commenting, including the reviewer, are benchmarking the Hamony 1100 against other IR remotes.  I would be willing to be that most purchasers of the Harmony 1000 and 1100 use it for the RF functionality.<br><br>The fact remains that the Harmony 890 and 1000/1100 are the only "reasonably priced" remotes that have RF functionality and can be programmed using a GUI rather than macros.<br><br>My wife and I agreed that the ergonomics of the 1000 were much better than the 890 which is why we purchased it and enjoy it today.  I also found the Logitech PC GUI to be very intuitive to setup.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike F.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 1:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Harmony 1100 remote review: a bigger screen isn't always better]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/20/harmony-1100-remote-review-a-bigger-screen-isnt-always-better/</guid><description><![CDATA[500$ dollars for a remote? I feel stupid enough telling people what I paid for my 890 though it still works well.<br>I think this is compensating for something else or just certain people shouldn't have credit cards<br><br>nuff said<br>Geo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 21st 2009 10:38PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
