<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why is this so disturbing ? or news ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um...because the amount of people on the planet that use Cell phones?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zephxiii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree.  And after reading all the comments,  it seems to be a pretty universal conclusion that  this is just a bad article.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kccboy2004]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's news because it makes us aware of something that is actually an issue.  I was just talking yesterday about how even though I'm using a Motorola phone for the third time in a row, I need to get an all new car charger for the third time in a row.  And it's disturbing because that unwillingness to standardize appropriate components seems to be a common denominator for a lot of companies (not just phone manufacturers), and that kind of stuff adds up... sure it's only another $20, but it's $20 I don't want to have to spend.  <br><br>Oh and that part about "micro-USB's supposedly more robust connector can handle something like 10x more disconnects"-- I don't think so.  I've had my ZN-5 for about a month and even though I've been reasonably careful with it, that "robust" connector is already to the point where it won't charge unless I prop the phone up in just the right position.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 2:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the 10x robustness thing, I'm not so sure about. Maybe in a lab environment where a machine is perfectly pulling the connector in and out, but in real world where there are forces and torques at other angles I bet it has it's issues too.<br><br>Anyway, I don't get what the issue is here. The industry for the most part was on the mini-usb standard for almost 4 year now. From about the time the RAZR came out. That's a long time in tech terms. Now they are moving to another standard and the great news is it's a standard that they are all agreeing on. Before 2004 it was crazy everybody had their own little connector and wires ran everywhere. <br><br>The article didn't mention it, but it's kind of an important point.... Micro-USB is smaller and a Mini-USB connector. This means smaller thinner gadgets. <br><br>To top it off look at the image of the article. Those little dongles from Motorola come with their micro-usb devices. This means that your mini-usb car charger and wall charger will still work with your new micro-usb device and your old mini-usb one. Digital cameras (video and still) will then start to take cues from the phone industry and migrate to the micro-usb.<br><br>Change happens people. So what's the problem?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[az_runner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[It was not the GSM assoc. that decided to standardise the EU forced them to.<br>Yes that evil empire across the Atlantic that Americans constantly whinge about actually did something good for consumers worldwide.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[A German MEP said he was going to push for a single charger, but he'd done entirely zip by the time the GSMA announced their initiative three days later. I really doubt that the GSMA moves all that quickly so I suspect the MEP in question got wind of the plan and made his demand in advance so it would make him look influential.<br><br><a href="http://www.telecompaper.com/news/article.aspx?cid=658155" rel="nofollow">http://www.telecompaper.com/news/article.aspx?cid=658155</a><br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7894763.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7894763.stm</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sockatume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Major4Play, this is simply not true. <br><br>@Sockatume: ding - this is closer<br><br>Actually, the standard was written by OMTP and adopted by GSMA. It was completely independent from any EU pressure, although it didn't take a genius to guess that they were going to start complaining about it if the industry didn't sort this out on its own.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fnuky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll still take it.  Regardless, you'd have to figure manufacturers would want the smaller of the two standards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[horizontaleight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only reason they "Want" the smaller of the two is to wring even more money out of consumers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorDex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Micro requires a smaller port and a smaller chipset; a must with how thin phones are becoming. Mini is just too big.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed and I would have thought this would have been quite obvious to Engadget.  Perhaps rather than complaining about this they should complain about why some companies (notably Apple) won't be making life easier for their customers by joining this new standard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[cause its not easier to have several plug sockets on a tiny phone / ipod for composite video / component video /audio, charging / syncing etc and unforeseen, i would much rather buy into something like the dock connector and have 1 socket, lets face it most people who use an iphone are not gonna go back to most other phones.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Regardless of the size of the connector, USB is still USB.  Micro port and connector is smaller than Mini, I get that.  But the chipset is not smaller just because of a smaller jack.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@bob<br><br>I did. I recognize the iPhone's talents, but it either a.) lacked features that I needed, or b.) clumsily implemented features that I needed. I suppose I could have done my research and not bought the iPhone in the first place, but I wanted to try it. And it was a fun phone. But the iPhone does not suit everyone's needs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Luckily Apple has to. EU demands that every cellphone uses same connector by 2012 :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 3:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, at least we can use micro to mini and mini to micro adapters :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zephxiii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, Mini USB is pretty chunky for certain devices. While I currently have about 4 mini USB chargers and 3 connectors and no Micro USB, as long as there is a standard I'll be happy.<br><br>It's not for this generation of devices anyhow, it's for tomorrow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Unfortunately it is for this generation of devices.  Many new products including the new line of Blackberry phones are showing up with the micro connector and forcing individuals to buy new accessories. <br><br>Tomorrow has arrived...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hooopla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@hooopla: Oh noes! You'll have to buy a micro-USB cable for $7 bucks, the horror! Those bastard greedy corporations! The least they could do is make sure that that cable will work with more than just one device... oh wait, they just did.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wrabbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wrabbit - it appears to be $1.94, not $7<br><br>but lets use your number, just for giggles<br><br>              $7<br> 10,000,000 people (low estimate of how many people this will effect in the first year)<br>-----------------<br>$70,000,000<br><br>huh, looky there, almost 3/4 of a Hundred million dollars.. for a cable change<br><br>Greedy Bastards]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 11:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@wrabbit: Not sure about you, but I don't know how many different mini-USB cables I have lying around. All I know is that it seems like at any given moment I can charge my phone. I don't want to replace all those with Micro-USB. Maybe I'll just tape a micro-USB to mini-USB adapter to the back of my phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[You don't have to get a micro-USB phone, just stick with the Mini-USB phones that are out now. By the time you would be forced to update, the new cables will be ubiquitous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SKI]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 1:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although I am very happy that it is going to be standardized, I am also confused I why the decision towards micro-usb. I mean there has to be close to 75-90% of phones that already use mini-usb. Just seems more logical to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[krische]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think your estimate sounds quite right.  Nokia have about 40% of the worldwide mobile phone market and they currently use a proprietary charger.  My N95 has a micro-usb port on it but it's only used for connection to a PC and doesn't charge the phone.  I believe it is also the exception and most Nokia phones don't have a USB port at all.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jakem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[The N95 has a Mini-USB if I remember correctly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 25th 2009 11:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mini-USB is a depreciated standard. This doesn't stop anyone using it in its current implimentation, of course, but it means there will be no Mini-USB plug for USB 3.0. So manufacturers are going to have to switch over in the future anyway. If they made Mini-USB the official standard, then in 2012 you'd either be stuck with USB 2.0 speeds on your industry-mandated Mini-USB port, or you'd have an industry-mandated Mini-USB port for power and a seperate Micro-USB port for USB 3.0 data. Neither of those is particularly desirable as far as phone manufacturers are concerned, and I doubt it would be a popular decision with consumers.<br><br>(Nothing's to stop phone manufacturers putting out a Mini-USB connector that also supports USB 3.0, but they'd be forbidden from using any of the USB-IF logos.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sockatume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I say there won't be, but of course I should say there probably won't be. There's still plenty of time for the standard to be revised.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sockatume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Best comment so far. Why wasn't this part of the article above?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@KarlW<br><br>Because the poster is incorrect... A connector is a connector, plain and simple, the number of wired connections is the same, just the form factor has changed.<br><br>While I am not going to scream greed like alot of posters are, I do find it annoying that I will need another adapter/cable, for my already cluttered rats nest of a computer table and car....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're right, it's actually mini-A which has been depricated.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sockatume]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jason: No, a connector isn't "just a connector."  A connector and its pin layout defines many characteristic electrical parameters that go into maintaining signal integrity, particularly as data rates increase.  The proximity of any given conductor to the case shield, for example, determines how much CMRR (Common-Mode Rejection Ratio) is affected, because it distorts the waveguide-like behavior of a twisted pair (this is why us ham radio folks who use ladder line or 300-ohm twin lead CANNOT place such wire near metal fixtures and expect good signal propegation to or from the antenna!).<br><br>The proximity of data-carrying pairs determines their characteristic impedance, an imbalance of which affects signal to noise ratio.  With low-voltage differential signaling, you'll find it doesn't take much distortion in the signal to introduce errors.  This is why you're not supposed to kink 10-base-T cable, for example, as it distorts the twists per inch, altering the SNR, which can (though not always) render a cable useless.<br><br>The length of the ground pins (as distinct from the +5V or data pairs) determines how much time a peripheral has to recognize it's coming onto the bus and to self-configure.  Smaller connectors necessarily means shorter differences in lead lengths, which means the protocol responses have tighter real-time constraints.<br><br>The smaller the contacts, the more likely corrosion will introduce errors on the bus.  (Expect to replace these micro-USB cables more often because of this, since the contacts are too far recessed to clean manually.)<br><br>The size of the pins also determines their current-carrying capacity.  Forget hub-powered peripherals.  Not really an issue for cell phones or digital cameras, thankfully.<br><br>The list goes on from here.  Anyone who thinks that connectors are just engineered for the sake of being different has only a fraction of the big-picture.  I won't deny this doesn't occur.  But to say that ALL connectors are effectively equivalent is just plain ignorant of the unbelievable engineering effort that goes into these things.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[for some reason, those bluetooth headsets already use this as charger...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[yeah i just got a voyager 855 and was pleased to see it has micro usb.  and just to chime in with the other 50% of the comments, micro makes so much more sense.  its smaller and just a better connector. and your new cell phone is going to come with a micro usb charger anyway, so why does it matter?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Gabriele]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[That part turns out to be 5$ after shipping. =-(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gr1zz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great to have this standardized for phones. How about mp3 players, GPS units and all other portable electronic gadgets? That would be awesome.<br><br>Of course...as noted earlier on Engadget, Apple is not a part of this, so no micro-USB on the iPhones (and ipods too if they ever standardize mp3 players).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree. Standardization across cellphones is nice I guess, but it doesn't really do anything except provide more options to buy chargers. I'd much prefer that the all chargers be like Apples with a standard PC side USB connector with a separate cable that plugs into it. Then make all the other gadgets you mentioned charge over USB. I only carry one cellphone. Requiring all Cellphones to have the same charging/data connection doesn't help me all that much. I still have to carry AC adapters for all the other gadgets.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rand:<br><br>I agree with you on the USB connector. It will help charge the devices from computers (and laptops on the go). Lets hope all this happens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Rand "I'd much prefer that the all chargers be like Apples with a standard PC side USB connector with a separate cable that plugs into it."<br><br>Which is exactly what the standard specifies :o)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fnuky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wasn't happy about this change either, so I asked the designers at Motorola about this a while ago. It basically boils down to two things. First, the way that the various manufacturers were using mini-USB for enhanced charging (over 500mA), audio accessories, etc wasn't standardized anywhere, and the various different uses were sometimes incompatible. Second, microUSB requires far less board mounting space and volume inside the phone itself, and less space means more space to squeeze other functions in.<br><br>$1.94 for an adapter is basically the cost of designing, manufacturing, packaging, and putting the device through channel. You aren't being ripped off here.<br><br>Please, educate your readers about the actual reasons for the change.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds reasonable to me. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zephxiii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another great reason for this standard is interoperability. In S. Korea all public transportation has chargers for your phone so you can pay to charge up on your commute. It makes for a good new revenue stream for our crappy public transportation system and allows us to start to catch up to the eastern worlds tech.<br><br>The greed issues abound when you have companies all trying to make people buy more chargers, one in the car, one at work, one at home, and this just makes it a bit easier for charger sharing across the board. ex. me & my girlfriend both have to have two different chargers in the car when we go to work, and i like to have a charger at the office just in case, this will allow us to share our chargers. <br>either way, I just think its great. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave G.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA["$1.94 for an adapter is basically the cost of designing, manufacturing, packaging, and putting the device through channel. You aren't being ripped off here."<br><br>So let me get this reasoning straight... we're not being ripped off because the company that supplied the device had to spend money to implement the feature?  You think they paid for that on their own dime?  We probably get charged $5 for that $1.94 in "added functionality" when we buy our phones.  It's hilarious that there are people here that deny that greed played any part in a decision made by profit-seeking companies (not that there's anything wrong with that).<br><br>And yeah it's great to have a standard, but I'm sure there will be a new standard for some reason or another in 2012.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcade]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd be pretty pissed if I were using a Nokia phone.<br>Now I'm pissed I'm not using a Nokia phone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hellios]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[My Nokia E71 has micro USB for syncing, but a cannot be charged that way. Sucks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Malaycobra]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[My Express Music 5320 phone already uses the micro USB to sync as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anantha92]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 24th 2009 5:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you can't figure out the reason why microUSB was chosen then you shouldn't be writing about cell phones on a tech blog.<br><br>Was it greed? No. R&D costs money and putting microUSB on every phone is going to cost the manufacturers plenty of R&D effort.<br><br>Was it microUSB's robustness? Perhaps it was a factor in the decision but not the main concern.<br><br>So what does that leave? Perhaps the blindingly obvious fact that microUSB is the smallest standardised charging+data port around! Of course DSLRs don't use microUSB. Why would they? Phones are small, DSLRs are not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 9:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[It isnt greeed...isn't it just the fact that its smaller?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nomi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[2012?  Let our childruns worry about it, I'll be too busy operating my flying car.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fistpittingnork]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on The $1.94 reason micro-USB is the new phone charging standard]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/23/the-1-94-reason-micro-usb-is-the-new-phone-charging-standard/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nobody mentioned the glorious fact that you practically never have to carry your cell phone charger with you anymore, or buy a new one when you travel overseas, since everywhere you go, someone you visit will have a charger you can borrow.<br><br>Brilliant and I hope it catches on to other types of devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abe Froman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 23rd 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
