http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/ Engadget Comments for Toshiba shows off 32nm NAND flash chips, promises to go smaller http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 1:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 1:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 2:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 10:41PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 1:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 2:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/32_nanometer

The right hand side has the road map basically.]]>Feb 25th 2009 2:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 2:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 4:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 5:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/
Chasing Schrodinger's cat.]]>Feb 25th 2009 5:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/
Well, considering the diameter of a Silicon atom is ~1/5 of a nm, its going to be difficult... ]]>Feb 25th 2009 8:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 25th 2009 8:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/After nanometer comes Angstrom (roughly the
diameter of a hydrogen atom (you're milage may vary)).
Frankly I think Angstrom is a more useful term even for today's technology.
So how about Intel's new 320 Angstrom chips!

Ralph Boland]]>Mar 25th 2009 1:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/25/toshiba-shows-off-32nm-nand-flash-chips-promises-to-go-smaller/Feb 26th 2009 4:15AM