<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I kind of miss the shape of my Kindle one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrLegend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/legendmedia/3307477599/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/legendmedia/3307477599/</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrLegend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Though I've never touched either, I was a bit intrigued by the Kindle one.  I like the shape a lot.  I agree with Joshua, "It was an angular, odd looking device that appealed on some strange, sci-fi level".  There's something about it that I really like.  The new curves don't quite do it for me.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah. I had to buy the cover for it, because without that, it feels like it's going to slip out of my hand.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrLegend]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, right! I kind of like the older shape too. It felt good in my hand. Just my opinion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinetreehater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I prefer a proper book I think. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's why I thought the Sony Reader was a better design from the beginning. It's just a screen w/ a little bezel for the "bare minimum".<br><br>But their content is so poor that you really don't find much usability if you're not truly into the mass consumption titles (which I can't understand why anyone would buy when they can get it free from their library). <br><br>If you like more obscure authors, publishers, subjects either will have major gaps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 1:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Me too.  I've been trying to fold this thing for 10 minutes and I'm have no luck whatsoever.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackstar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 2:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm loving mine so far! If it were for 100% casual reading, I probably wouldn't have bought it at the current price, but my school uses a LOT of Ebooks and text documents. The Kindle will make it a lot easier to get my reading done without have to be tethered to my laptop for hours at a time. Traveling and reading on a plane will be easier to as my Dell XPSM1730 isn't exactly portable  :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you modify the text size?  I am thinking about getting one for my elderly mother and I think the larger type would be better for her.  I read in the review that you can "zoom" in, but I am guessing that means needing to pan from left to right to read a sentence.  I am hoping that you can just select a text size.  Can you?<br>Thanks for taking the time to reply...<br>~Ana]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ana]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2009 6:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I said it once, I'll say it again. This thing should not be a cent above $150...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[egress63]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[And Sony's OLED tv shouldn't cost as much as it does. You know what though? It's a moot point because that's how much the tech costs right now. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[They could probably make it that price, and then you'd be paying a monthly fee for the wireless service. I like it this way better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Anonymous]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Richard: And new hardware manufacturing aside, let's not forget the initial throwing of some money at the folks who worked hard to make the new tech possible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ananimus3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2009 2:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Shaped like a large iphone!!?? Give me a break.  Just because the thing is rectangular with round edges.  My table looks like an iphone!  Apple haters for this comment i give you permission to flame on engadgets favoratism.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dude, you've got issues.  How is this favoritism towards apple?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr_mcflugelbutt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[10 Reasons Why Kindle 2 Misses The Mark?  ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[mcfluglbutt,<br><br>On this site, there is a heated debate among bloggers that engadget favors the iphone alot.  It is argued that they favor it so much so that they prefer it over many other things.  I try to stay neutral but end up disagreeing with this argument for the most part, but with this one quote i would say that there is some sort of favoratism.  <br><br>So McNoobbutt, thats thats the issue.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[lol, mcfluglbutt]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skyblaze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[but isn't Josh a Palm fanboy and not an iPhone fanboy?<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[So...wouldn't Josh have said 'It's like a large iPhone clone'?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 1:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[When I read that line about being shaped like the iphone, I stopped reading the review. There are a many viable ebook readers on the market, why is this thing being compared to the iphone right of the bat, instead of other ebook readers. Its as if anything with a touchscreen, plays music, is white, and now apparently is rectangular, reminds people of either the iphone or the ipod. What about sony's reader for a comparison?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonathans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@jonathans <br><br>Exactly my feelings. When I got to this line "shaped like a big iPhone", I lost all interest to the review. As much as I respect Joshua, this comparison undermines my trust to the whole article. Let's compare everything to iPhone, yeah, right.<br><br>Just of the curiosity I searched the article for the word "iPhone". I found another line in Joshua's article:<br><br>"...Now, going back and forth from a Kindle to, say... an iPhone". <br>...<br>...<br>:))) <br>LOL<br><br><br>No vavoritism, huh? Maybe it's a marketing strategy - compare everything to iPhone to become a success. Even Jon Stewart did that in interview with Bezos, right?<br><br>Anyway, I will finish reading the interview, but those iPhone comparisons... LOL, just LOL.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Electromodo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, can someone explain to me why it's OK to be an iPhone hater, but not an iPhone lover?  Isn't that a little childish and one-sided?  <br><br>Maybe engadget likes iPhones, or maybe they're comparing it to an iPhone because there are 20 million of them in the wild, and commercials on prime time TV every 10 minutes.  People know what an iPhone looks like, and nobody freakin knows what a Sony eBook reader looks like.<br><br>I have an iPhone.  I have a Kindle2.  The Kindle 2 does look like an iPhone, especially from the back.  It's aluminum with a plastic band across the top.  It's as thin as a #2 pencil.  It's nice.  I've only had it a couple days, but so far, I love it.  And I can stop reading eBooks on my iPhone...<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 9:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This thing would be perfect if they had simply left the SDHC card slot and if they did away with the DRM on the kindle books. Or presented a .azw reader for the computer. Anyways I won't even consider it until those two things are done.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Khelben Arunson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe it's possible to read .azw books through the mobipocket reader (PC software) if you do a simple rename of the file.  You can also download the books directly to your machine through the "manage my kindle" link.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bondtastic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[What surprised me is that a lot of the e-books aren't much cheaper than the regular books--at least for current titles.  There are no printing costs, and no transportation costs, so you'd think they could seriously discount the material.  For me, unless they radically lower the price of their e-books, it's just not worth it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[For most new releases the price is far cheaper for the ebook than the real book.s new books cost between 20 and 30 bucks, where the ebooks are 10.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bananarama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA["For most new releases the price is far cheaper for the ebook than the real book.s new books cost between 20 and 30 bucks, where the ebooks are 10."<br><br>And the second the book is released on paperback it drops down to $3.  The ebooks are based off of the price of the cheapest current paper format rather than having a price based on their own costs and profits.  Ebooks would be a lot more compelling if their price matched what was delivered (just like I have a hard time paying $10 for a digital album that costs $10 on CD).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Production actually accounts for very little of a book's cost. (especially with a hardback)<br><br>Most of it goes to the author and various other people involved.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 2:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am sure that the publisher gets more money than the printing costs. Things like the Kindle mean that we will one day be able to do without publishers. Books will be cheaper then.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 3:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Dave <br><br>From what I heard this is the issue with publishers. Some publishers just don't want to reduce the price for ebook in comparison with paper version, but some publishers do. This is why some ebooks on Amazon are much cheaper than paper versions and some are almost the same price.<br><br>I heard Amazon has tough times to deal with this Publisher's greed.<br><br>Cost of books production is not as insignificant as Plothole said. Remember the article about NY Times saying that it will be cheaper for them to give Kindle for free to each of their subscribers and distribute newspaper electronically, than printing it? Here is a link for you:<br><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/printing-the-nyt-costs-twice-as-much-as-sending-every-subscriber-a-free-kindle" rel="nofollow">http://www.businessinsider.com/2009/1/printing-the-nyt-costs-twice-as-much-as-sending-every-subscriber-a-free-kindle</a><br><br>So paper cost is not a small thing, rather opposite.<br><br>From what I understand, the problem is not Amazon, but greedy/paranoid publishers. Otherwise ebooks would really cost much less than paper versions.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Electromodo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 5:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Electromodo<br>Books and newspapers are not the same thing though. There is a different cost breakdown.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this thing had an apple logo at the top, i wonder how many more people would buy it.  just speculating though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it had an Apple logo, I would buy it. Sad but true.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[infobhan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it had an Apple logo, it would probably be a different and (sadly) better product.  No matter how well Amazon makes and markets the Kindle, it doesn't have the same mass appeal as AAPL products...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nah, if it had an Apple logo, it would be the same product with a different but equally restrictive DRM back end.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[This wouldn't have an Apple logo on it because Apple would not release this product. They tend release new products by waiting until a market is more mature, then release a refined product that delivers a noticeably better user experience. In other words, if Apple made one of these, it would be after e-ink was fast enough to behave close to a normal screen and touch-screen or other technology was available to remove that awkward keyboard and allow the computer functions to be largely hidden.<br><br>Amazon is in a different position. They're releasing the Kindle to speed the transition of the industry to more paperless reading, which will be likely to both increase consumption of books and dramatically cut down on storage and transportation costs. Amazon makes most of its money selling books; Apple makes most of its money selling hardware/software integrated devices.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dwsolberg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 28th 2009 1:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am dying to get one, but the price is really high, and makes me wonder if I should get it or not. <br>I do read a lot, but my first use for this would be for school. I teach French in college, and I have to carry around at least two books a day that feel like bricks in my bag. My main concern is that these books are not eBooked yet (did I just invent a new verb? Yay).<br><br>When text book publishing co. will understand that I don't need to carry around a 300 pages book every day just to teach classes, I will be a happy man!<br><br>I have a new riot call: eBook Text Books... eBook Text Books...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ポール]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ipod for books, huh? Im sorry, but i paid 209 dollars for my Ipod, and it serves very well as an "Ipod for books" as well as a *GASP* IPOD! Stanza is a great program that allows me to load my personal files with little fanfare or difficulty.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duncan.macleod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you've ever used an e-ink device you would know the comparison is silly. The iPod/iPhone isn't even even the same league as a true e-ink device for reading plain text.  We happen to have an iPod Touch, iPhone, and Kindle 1 in our home and the Apple devices simply don't compare.  In fact, after using all three, the thought it sitting down to read for a couple of hours on an iPhone is simply absurd.  They may work phone for scanning through some work docs during a commute, on the road, etc..., but no serious reader is going to want to use them for extended reading... at least not after using an e-ink device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vidikron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, but the iPhone doesn't take almost a second to even START redrawing the screen like the Kindle 2 does. And if there are grey-scale pictures on the screen the Kindle 2 does this 3-stage or so refresh to draw the image.<br><br>It's really weird. And coupled with the $360 price, it makes it very hard to justify one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure, e-ink has lots of room for improvement, but the fact it takes a second for the Kindle to draw a new page doesn't change the fact that small LCDs are complete shit for extended reading and have terrible battery life in comparison to e-readers.   Waiting for the page to redraw isn't that much different than physically turning a page and the advantages for extended reading are worth it IMO.  As I said, we got all three of those devices in out home... the Kindle arrived last and I was blown away at how good it was for reading books.  It looks amazingly like real paper and looks even better in bright light (the opposite of LCDs).  The Apple devices are simply terrible in comparison. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vidikron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, but those other devices can do the job and lots of other jobs too. $360 for the Kindle and all it can do is read books and already with problems at that that we both mention.<br><br>I guess if you're loaded, why not have another device, you'll be well prepared for the overpriced content (that you can't loan out or sell) too.<br><br>If I had to buy every book I read, even at a discount, it would triple my reading material budget. Most books I buy are loaned out at least once and over half of the ones I read are borrowed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, first of all, you've changed the tracks on me here.  You've gone from defending using an iPod to arguing for used/borrowed books.   Technically, both an iPod and Kindle would have the same issues are far as buying used or loaning goes.  The used/borrow route is going to be cheaper for most things you can think of.  If you're someone that does than then obviously a device like the Kindle isn't for you.  <br><br>But I generally read serveral hardback books a month.  I'm caught up on all my series and authors and I generally don't like to wait for the paperbacks, so I end up buying new hardbacks most of the time.  I also don't usually sell books so I have to invest in bookcases.  As I stated elsewhere in these comments I dropped nearly $400 on a bookcase a couple of years ago.  As with anything, it just depends on your personal situation.  For me a Kindle is actually worth the price even at the current level. <br><br>All that aside, I'd still never read any novels on an iPhone.  I'd rather use the actual book long before I'd ever think of using a device like the iPhone.  It may be multi-purpose, but that doesn't mean it's well suited for every purpose.  In this case it amounts to nothing more than an inferior stop gap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vidikron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 12:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great review!  Grrr...The instant availability sold me.  I'm waiting UPS overnight thanks to Amazon Prime.  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Balatro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[If i could get all my text books for it id be sold in a second.  Lugging books isn't fun.  Im not holding my breath tho.  <br><br>Other then that holding a book at home is a huge pleasure in this digital world.  This isn't needed outside of uni's imo.  That coming from a gadget freak like me too.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aussie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Got mine in last night and I dig it.  I offered to trade mine with my wife's 1G Kindle and thankfully she loves (as the put it) the "Battlestar Galactica feel" of the G1 and I can keep my slick little G2. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Master Bruce]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, when you put it like that, I'd probably want the K1, too. I wonder if BSG eBook readers had beveled corners?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 4:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/26/amazon-kindle-2-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kindle 2 rocks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pablo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 26th 2009 11:54AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
