<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's nice, but I believe you need more than 9TB to get into Mordor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michas_pi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 5:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm sure the 9 ginormous fans might help it get there buiddy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Level 5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 7:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not your buddy, friend.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was very well timed, sir.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[What a shame... great specs gone to waste on a windows platform.<br><br>Don't get me wrong. I love windows... but not any of my servers. Linux could really juice those specs better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[E71]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only 1 yr warranty? I was expecting a bit more than a year for that price. LOL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pika2000]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 5:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[1 year parts warranty - however, most individual components will have longer warranties.  Seagate drives are 5 year, WD are 3 year (most of them), processors and such are 1 or 2 years, typically.<br><br>However, the lifetime labor warranty is nice.  All you have to do is buy a new processor and they'll be there to put it in lickety-split (hopefully)<br><br>neat concept, but vastly overpriced.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeesusfreek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[As of 2009, Seagate changed their warranty to 3 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[For that price I'd expect some fancy SSD like the one from FusionIO.<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iodrive&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=iodrive&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit</a>=<br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=fusionio&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=fusionio&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit</a>=<br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=fusion+io&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=fusion+io&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit</a>=]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (BarCODE)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Where do I buy one?  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lionel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[**Windows Server 2008]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 5:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now that's a heatsink.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 5:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[but can it fly?..)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrTed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Look at how many fucking fans are on that goddamn motherfucker!!!<br><br>Yes, all the profanity was for emphasis. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[or just buy a Mac Pro and save you the ugliness.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[1) Mac Pro has Dual Quad cores, this has Quad Quad Cores<br>2) Who gives a toss about how ugly it is, normal people dont buy PCs because they look pretty especially not servers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ArcticFox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[we'll see about quad quad after today's announcement ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[....yeah, but can your Mac play Crisis ?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Makavre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 11:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is redicioulus, sure you MIGHT be able to have it under your desk, but a DELL R900 with the same config is probably less than half the price, and is enterprise grade to boot. Theres no point in having a windows 2008 server under your desk either, its called server for a reason.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[max]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[You should read this <br><br><a href="http://www.win2008workstation.com/wordpress/2008/03/16/why-should-i-use-a-server-os-for-my-workstation/" rel="nofollow">http://www.win2008workstation.com/wordpress/2008/03/16/why-should-i-use-a-server-os-for-my-workstation/</a><br><br> Apparently: "Windows Server 2008 has almost exactly the same features as Windows Vista (SP1), but is remarkably faster and more stable! People say: “It’s Windows Vista without the bloat“!"<br><br>I don't know, I'm taking their word for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just configured a Dell R905 on Dell's canadian website with the following specs.<br><br>4x Opteron 2.3GHz Quad core<br>16GB RAM<br>2x 15k 173GB RAID 1<br>3x 7.2k 1TB RAID 5<br><br>And the total was $11,780 canadian dollars, or approx. US$9161.31.  So that's a savings of over $6000.  With that savings you get slightly faster CPUs, an enterprise class rackmount chassis, full hardware level remote management (you can even install an OS on it from half way around the world), redundant power supplies, hot swap drives.<br><br>You'll lose a couple of drives (an external drive cage is dirt cheap), and of course that lovely fan wart on the side of the case... :p]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 9:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can assure you that Server 2008 converted to a work station is considerably faster than Vista (I am using it that way)!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[frauhottelmann]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[In 3 years this will cost $2000 tops. Why bother.... (I have made the mistake before)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I was pretty much going to same the same, although I'd give it 2 years, and a price tag of $800.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[f3rg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously? You buy computer that is three years old?<br><br>I can't even remember what I have three years ago<br>1st gen Core CPU? One thing for sure though, it probably get like 3fps in Crysis<br><br>I mean you can't really enjoy the technology if you always wait for the price to drop<br><br>Regardless, it is on pricey side....well is it? Some 'ET' brand probably will sell for a lot more with the same spec ...LOL<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gaddelyz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[...a mere $16,338.89! We live in different worlds]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 7:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Standard edition only support up to 2 processors, need at least enterprise edition to use all those cores.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not true. Server 2008 Standard supports 4 physical sockets. And if it is x64 the 32GB is covered too. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TLdrvr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[I stand corrected]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrianM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[hey that looks good but not better than the alienware ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brianyman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats actually a lot cheaper than a similar spec R900 in the UK!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SimonMac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[All old shit.<br><br>Not impressed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[strider_mt2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 7:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[We have rack mount servers of an equal specification to this at work for hosting virtualised guests, and they don't need anywhere near such extreme cooling, nor do they cost anywhere near ~$16,000. Fair enough not all manufacturers have the same output and sourcing capabilites as the big boys, but it raises the question why bother at all if the price tag ends up so high that you have no potential market.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 7:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Enormous..... yes. Gigantic...... yes.  Ginormous..... well not in any real dictionary but it carries with the standard of grammar on this site :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr.E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 17th 2009 11:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, Engadget would find it easy to "find someone who wasn't content with this beast". Gamers. The graphics in it are not too great, but then that is not what it is designed for. The customer wanted POWER in a QUIET form factor... best guess would be video-editing. <br> Still, it would be nice to hear from the customer exactly what he (or possibly she) is up to.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too rich for my blood, but I'd otherwise pick this up in a heartbeat for some intense personal scientific computing.  With these specs it's ideal for some massive, brute force multi-threaded calculations.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ananimus3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 3:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[At some point isn't it just more effective to buy a real server?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2009 8:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[>two VelociRaptor hard drives in RAID1<br><br>Wouldn't you go SAS for this price?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MioTheGreat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 8:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess it would depend on your application, but most people would probably benefit more from a faster disk subsystem and higher speed cores than the extra  couple of sockets.   I build 2 x Intel 2.5 GHz (or faster) quads w/ 32 GB for VM servers all the time and they'd run circles around this things for my need needs.  And they cost less and have a 4-hour replacement warranty.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[culbeda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't a 15k.7 be faster, though?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MioTheGreat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 10:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or SSD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (BarCODE)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 11:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[With a price like that it should come with some oral pleasure as well...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[heavyharmonies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is anyone else wondering why the URL says windows 2000 instead of 2008?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 9:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because Joseph L. Flatley screwed up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DarkLight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 1:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[inb4 but can it handle Crysis?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 9:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm maybe If I add 2 top of the line video cards and 4 more processors to this I could play Crysis at max settings lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zope]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[This computer on ebay is way cheaper  and has 4x  Quad-Core OPTERON 8356 model<br>running at 2.3Ghz   15 TB array 64GB,  $9,700.00<br><br><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/TYAN-S4985G3NR-Server-15-TB-array-64GB-4-x-8356-OPTERON_W0QQitemZ270340837689QQcmdZViewItemQQptZCOMP_EN_Servers?hash=item270340837689&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A570|66%3A2|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A1318|301%3A1|293%3A1|294%3A50" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/TYAN-S4985G3NR-Server-15-TB-array-64GB-4-x-8356-OPTERON_W0QQitemZ270340837689QQcmdZViewItemQQptZCOMP_EN_Servers?hash=item270340837689&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A570|66%3A2|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A1318|301%3A1|293%3A1|294%3A50</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[16CoreMan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[risking water leaks in a server class machine + risking data loss with bit-rot champ Raid5 = FAIL.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CancerJobs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 2:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[And why exactly for that price don't you get Shanghai 2.7Ghz?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 2:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Puget Systems' $16K Windows 2008 server]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/03/puget-systems-16k-windows-2000-server/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of course, you could turn the fans up to full blast and roam the countryside via hot air balloon. Seems like something Corey Doctorow could get used to :). 'Course, then he'd have the problem of power supply. But that's what the Palm Touchstone is for, right? :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 3rd 2009 4:10PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
