<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah that is all we need a 4th player in the x86.  Don't forget about the x86 manufacturing companies that don't exist anymore because of Intel's wrath.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarnation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[and yet Microsoft get's sued for having a monopoly... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FNG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agree with that. Nvidia probably overlooked what happened to AMD trying to challenge Intel with microprocessors. Now, the only thing thriving in AMD is ATI graphics cards.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD went head to head. Processor for processor. They weren't innovators. When you go head to head and have less R&D and less money, you lose.<br><br>NVidia seems to have a whole different outlook on this situation. It seems to me they would be designing their CPUs to work with their own specialized GPUs and motherboards. Look at the hype for Ion already. That's going to be huge, and it is just the first step.<br><br>NVidia can compete where AMD failed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AVG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually AVG, the problem with AMD wasn't that Intel kicked their ass, its that AMD let themselves get their ass kicked.<br><br>What I mean is that when the Athlon XP and Athlon 64 started to kick the crap out the the Pentium 4 and it's NetBurst architecture, the new CEO of AMD at the time, Hector Ruiz, decided to slash their R&D budget heavily. Claiming that they didn't need to worry about spending so much on new processor design and fabrication.  This lead the company to having nothing ready to compete against the Pentium M.  And once Intel realized this they moved in for the kill by taking the Pentium M lessons and building the Core processor.<br><br>If AMD hadn't cut their R&D budget they probably would have been able to get things like the Phenom and 32nm fabrication out quicker.  Perhaps allowing them to avoid the current PR disaster of the Phenom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mythicflux]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why not pummel the hell out of the Atom line by introducing an x64 processor?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shaft0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2009 9:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who is the 3rd one?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sektor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel, AMD, and VIA]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarnation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Via?<br><br>Or comedy Cyrix option!?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flaystus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[VIA nano seems promising, but it's yet to be proven as atom killer when it's widely available]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cyrix does not exist anymore. It was taken over by National Semiconductor quite a while back. Don't know what happened to it after that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think they're talking more about Via Nano CPU and its integration with Nvidia motherboard, not a Core i7 competitor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinigami]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[nVidia buy VIA!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 6:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nvidia does not have a legal right to make an x86 processor. VIA and Nvidia should set up a joint venture or merge or buy the other out so that they can acquire the licenses needed to go ahead. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethicsg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL WUT]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roflercopterer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[@roflercopterer  <br><br>I second that]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, it's true - there's cross-licensing agreements that AMD and Intel have with each other, and I believe VIA has similar agreements.<br><br>If you don't have a license to x86, then you can't legally make x86 CPUs.<br><br>But, I could actually see Intel doing it. Why, you ask? Well, AMD's not in the greatest of shape, and if they go out of business, it leaves Intel as the only MAJOR x86 player, opening them up to serious antitrust stuff. Intel doesn't want to be the only major x86 player simply because of all the legal stuff they'll have to deal with if they are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bhtooefr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[intel already invaded GPU market, nvidia is just fighting back, though the chance is kind of slim]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[htd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[How did they invade?  Intel's GPU offerings are kinda crappy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tarnation]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, the Intel GPUs suck hard but they are also sold FAR more often than NVIDIA and ATI GPUs. Take a hard look at all of the various corp desktops and the older Apple stuff. Intel GPUs are everywhere!<br><br>I'd buy a halfway decent NVIDIA CPU if it was coupled to a decent GPU and could do hardware accelerated High Def. Can you say XBMC STB? If the ION won't get off the ground with an ATOM and if no one makes the VIA ION platform then sure why not NVIDIA? Do they have the rights to build one is the question....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BLKMGK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[not when intel has gotten the bid to work on sony's ps4 with larabee... like how nvidia got the headstart into the graphics winning the ms bid on the xbox.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 5th 2009 1:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[exciting possibility, if we see more horsepower and better graphics at lower power usage? i'm in for one]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can of whoop ass anyone? intel? LOL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[I almost forgot I was reading Engadget until you guys added that pointless Apple part. I think there have been enough posts about the Mini and whatnot eh?<br>(BTW I'm not really complaining. Kinda an Apple fan myself, just not of the Clak and iLuver caliber :p)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriks7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fights like this are HUGE benefits to consumers!  Rock on!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bking5]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Meet Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang, the man who plans to make the CPU obsolete. - Wired, July 2002]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[champs794]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[HAHA! See, you were fooled!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now that's something i would like to see!!<br><br>go, go Nvidia!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[novettam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't legally do that, I don't think, at least in the US...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mdmadph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im interested in what they can do...... Id love to see what those Ions can do when properly packaged.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hackettman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've seen what what Nvidia's CUDA does in Seti@home.  The CUDA is 10 times faster in general to Intel and AMD CPUs in the simulation runs.  I wonder, if they will bring that architecture to the CPU table.  It's pretty awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fretz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 9:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[If by sold you mean people got stuck using Intel GPUs then yeah Ill agree.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bakkoda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've seen what what Nvidia's CUDA does in Seti@home.  The CUDA is 10 times faster in general to Intel and AMD CPUs in the simulation runs.  I wonder, if they will bring that architecture to the CPU table.  It's pretty awesome.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dlfretz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[nvidia should focus on marketing its low price, integrated gpus instead of fighting intel. Emphasize on benefits of a good gpu vs. Integrated on everyday tasks like web browsing and word processing, instead of just games. make a super low power, low cost gpu like an atom for gpu world,and watch it sell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[icepop4who]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh please nvidia, don't.  I don't want another source of instability from you.  The chipsets and GPUs are enough.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Leindurstit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[x64 is the next step in CPUs though?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SDreamer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[x86_64 (what you're talking about) is an extension to the x86 standard. From the consumer standpoint, it really only makes the chip compatible with amounts of ram over 4gb. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andrew autopsy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[zzzzzz]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[McLovin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 12:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why, oh why?  x86 needs to die!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Weet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 12:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Absolutely.  --but right now it's still in the feature creep phase.  It's still getting more advanced.  I don't think we'll see a complete refactoring for a while yet..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ethana2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well competition is good i suppose.<br><br>I currently have a GTX285, a sweet card, but I don't know if I would trust nvidia with CPU making. The 8800 series gpu was a huge bust, their Nforce chipsets are horrible, with poor driver support and features that are buggy.<br><br>Right now Intel makes some pretty great CPU's that have a pretty good entry price point; which I believe we can thank AMD for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balls]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[In what way was the 8800 series of graphics cards a bust?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SirisC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 2:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[@SirisC: The 8800 had all kinds of faults. Don't tell me you missed the memo that the nvidia "bad bumps" also effected the 8800 line as well as the 8600's.<br><br>I had 2 different 8800 GTS' fail on me. Luckily it had the XFX Double Lifetime warranty, and I got them replaced both times for free. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balls]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 7:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[@AVG<br><br>Yeah, AMD has only ever played catch up.  Things like dual core, and (successful) 64-bit CPUs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AustynSN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, AMD rocked intel for about 2 years (Athlon vs P4/Netburst), as well as in the server market, as well as beating intel to x64... Someone else mentioned that above...  We'll see what the future brings, Phenomx4 is finally a decent product, albeit a generation behind i7.  No matter where you stand, you have AMD to thank for competitive pricing (and head-to-head competition in the GPU market with ATI).<br>As for the article- this is not your standard attack, the ultimate goal here is a one-chip solution.  The future will be very interesting...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ruppel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2009 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[i guess I wasn't paying enough attention, but I thought the Ion platform was Ion GPU paired with their own x86 CPU.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[i reckon an nvidia cpu would be pretty ballin'. if they did half as good a job as they do with their gpus it would be something to look out for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hef]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 2:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[Performance wise, no doubt. From an anecdotal standpoint, I think Nvidia's QC is trash.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[balls]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think you guys are correct about the licensing thing.  First off, x86 compatibility and Intel 80x86 processors are two different things.  I think the INTENT was to say "we plan to put together an x86-compatible CPU" or something thereabouts, which is not a licensing issue and has nothing to do with any patents -- especially considering they could redesign the entire chipset around any licensing issues you might worry about and they have the resources to write drivers that won't totally suck.<br><br>Jen-Hsun Huang is my hero; no executive can expect any sort of career longevity when talking so much smack, but here he is.<br><br>And to agree with the people about competition making our world better: YAYYYY!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Fruzzetti]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/04/nvidia-gets-further-up-intels-chuff-with-pledge-to-develop-an-x/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're probably right about that.  Emulation is legal, so an nvidia implementation of the x86 instruction set shouldn't be a problem.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Omar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 4th 2009 6:05PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
