http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/ Engadget Comments for Cisco said to be buying Pure Digital for around $500 million http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 12:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 1:21AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 1:49AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 12:46AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 1:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 1:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 6:00AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 2:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 2:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 2:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 3:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/
The flip is commendable for using CMOS sensor, but the lack of expandable memory and pricing are not competitive anymore. Shooting video on an LCD screen that small is just painful.]]>Mar 9th 2009 3:15AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/
I just hope Cisco doesn't screw anything up. ]]>Mar 9th 2009 3:12AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/
I've seen their other designs and they are fine. Is that white model the first one ever released or something?]]>Mar 9th 2009 5:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/
Half a billion sounds overpriced if you ask me. ]]>Mar 9th 2009 5:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/…it's like saying "Kleenex" in place of "tissue"]]>Mar 9th 2009 12:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 7:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/
I could start up new company with a better product for $1m, and sell it to cicso for 1.5million.
]]>Mar 9th 2009 8:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 12:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 1:56PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 9th 2009 5:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/cisco-said-to-be-buying-pure-digital-for-around-500-million/Mar 10th 2009 12:19AM