<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you ask me, Android and the G1 are the phones and phone OS of the future.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yopladas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only if Google smartens up, stops decisions like this, and enables multi-touch]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[what are you smoking ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gareth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually it's a sound decision.<br><br>Imagine if everyone (in the normal world) knew how to jailbreak their iPhone and get apps for free off forums. It would end any App store/market. And yes not everyone could hack his phone. My friend has an iPhone and doesn't know how to download apps for free, and another friend can't disable his iPhone recognizing my Wifi, and was considering going to a "geek gathering" to fix this "problem".<br><br>As small as the Android market is, and as geeks are a huge fraction of the G1 holders, it's important to slow down piracy otherwise Android Market will be done and developers will turn away.<br><br>The same thing is happening to PC gaming now.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TareX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 9:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[My friends are too stupid to do anything with anything slightly electronic. So I jailbreak their iPhones and iPods for $20. <br>:P Geeks will win in the end. It's just a matter of time.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yopladas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 9:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Android will eventually be great, but the G1 is a POS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 10:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I know about Google plan to develop an OS ... since forever, and about their portable device = phone. I hope everybody will understand that an OS must exist on every phone/smart | portable device.<br><br>"Geeks will win in the end" - hmmm<br>- if a developer wants to encrypt a data and not let you to "jailbreak your iPhone" he will do that. <br>But - no corporation want to invest money or effort in some thing like that... look at MS - they win ALL markets just by letting you "crack" the Windows...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elvis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 6:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[While I wouldn't say that Android is a dud, I would say it's a candy pistol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 10:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a matter of fact nobody did ask you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KilgoreTrout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2009 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a matter of fact nobody did ask you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KilgoreTrout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2009 6:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hate this engadget commenting poo.<br>I'm sorry, I meant: nobody asked you but I agree with your prediction]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KilgoreTrout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 15th 2009 6:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[In the first sentence there are 2 fors "El Goog's just released Android 1.1 for for its totally unlocked version of the G1."<br>good job engadget :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[What the hell is "El Goog?"<br><br>Som lame attempt to sound cool?<br>M]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigDaddyM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why don't you ask Engadget? They said it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yopladas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 9:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I prefer to be locked into the Apple world. Don't fight it – you'll only feel a pinch...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[captainpease]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[pinch: 3k/year]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[skanterakis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 9:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[new update? I have been using the ADP phone for more than a month by now. I do have access to paid apps and it's true that I never have access to those copy protected apps for the whole time. This is not really something new.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anh D. Nguyen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[the new part is update 1.1 is out for adp. the by the by part is you still cant do the copy protection. i wonder if simply reimaging to jf for tmob us would let you access the apps, or if its something it recognizes in the hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Foebea]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[os of the future?<br>WebOS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[robdesair]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[What we need is an operating system of the past.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Itsuru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[CubaOS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bill cant fart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[BeOS?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 11th 2009 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[This update is crippled... Latitude has been removed for some unknown/undisclosed reason. Some open platform this is turning out to be.<br><br><a href="http://groups.google.com/group/Android-DevPhone-Updating/t/22e15a4d72168915" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/Android-DevPhone-Updating/t/22e15a4d72168915</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason D. Clinton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 9:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Latitude is an application on top of Google Maps. If that feature is disabled, it has nothing to do with the Android platform. Just because the OS is an open platform doesn't mean all the apps will be.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another well thought out update... NOT! Many, many people (myself included) have rooted phones that aren't dev phones, so "Android's hilariously weak-ass copy protection features" are still worthless. All my fellows members at the xda-developers forum are anti-piracy of android software, and aren't going to pirate apps, but it just goes to show you that this is worthless.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayson B]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 10:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about fixing the shipping price for Dev1 phone, Google?<br>$264 to ship it to Canada!?!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bluesky_v2.01]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 11:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'd gladly pay it if it came with a 3G radio that supported 850MHz UMTS, but since it doesn't it just adds insult to injury.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravnos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 11:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[the g1 is to phones as spore was to video games in 2008]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 9th 2009 11:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn you HTC! Release an Android OS phone that can use AT&T's 3G frequencies!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spooner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 12:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I own one of this but I am sick of this phone...  <br><br>Android sounded good<br><br>looks promising<br><br>now I doubt its future - poor execution from Google so far<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[x android fan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 12th 2009 5:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google issues first Android Dev Phone 1 update, clarifies paid app situation]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/09/google-issues-first-android-dev-phone-1-update-clarifies-paid-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Re-read the article and it sounds like a 14 year old fanboy. So yeah, totally, like<br>Apple is the best, omfg]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 10:32AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
