http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/ Engadget Comments for Engadget Podcast 137 - 03.13.2009 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 4:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/
Looks like I've 3 day's worth of good health from that AppleCast! Engadget playing the Apple card again!


(Nothing against Apple, just sayin').]]>Mar 13th 2009 5:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 9:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/
Like the new shuffle, what the? Why wasn't that ripped apart in engadget's post? Gimme a break. I'm just about done with engadget. Gizmodo may not be hitting Hollywood, but at least they're not owned.]]>Mar 13th 2009 6:21PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 6:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 7:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 7:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/
You called them out for being pro-Shuffle when you had not listened to the podcast. Then you did listen, and you realised that they were not pro-Shuffle.

At that point, the decent and correct thing to do would be to apologise for your mistaken assumption. Instead, you've basically said, "No, I was right, because you were not anti-Shuffle *enough*."

That is pathetic - you have no way of establishing that they would be "harder" if it were an MS or Sony product (it does not even sound remotely accurate to me); that was just a weasel claim to attempt to get out of admitting your mistake. Have some decency, man.]]>Mar 14th 2009 9:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/
Look at my first post...no, no, now look again lawyer. When I referred to the shuffle, I was referring to the engadget POST on the shuffle - which IS way to lenient (BTW-I never say they are pro shuffle)! I never said in my first post that I had listened to the podcast (it normally goes to the mp3 player and I listen when I have time). I was going by the outline in this post - which was Fallon, Apple, Apple, Apple, Apple....

I'm not in court here, I don't have to 'establish' that they would be harder on Sony or MS, my observations have been that they are. But even more than that, I am saying they spend all their time talking about apple. Sure they throw in some 'negative' apple time --- 'I wouldn't buy this shuffle, I would buy a Nano'... what the!? Sure they tell themselves that was 'negative', but it's positive as well.

I'm trying to point out to these guys that they have become very one dimensional, and that they are not helping the gadget world by comparing everything to apple, talking almost solely about apple, and constantly denying their apple fanboydome (or sarcastically saying that they are fanboys - thinking that because they said it sarcastically that that somehow proves they are not fanboys?).

Decency? How about Engadget starts showing some decency!

...And Vanilla - it looks like almost ALL your comments on Engadget are on Apple, so stop with your agenda and get back to work in your Apple cubicle. Engadget may actually look unbiased when compared to you.]]>Mar 15th 2009 1:19AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 6:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 13th 2009 6:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/makes them very attractive. I take my Lenovo S10 lots of places and
if it gets stolen I'm out $400 instead of $$$$. I also use Firefox in
full scrreen mode(F11 key) with the autohide extension to get the most
of my 1024x600 screen. Keep up the good work!!!! ]]>Mar 13th 2009 8:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/engadget-podcast-137-03-13-2009/Mar 17th 2009 9:30AM