<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Linux has 8.1% market share?  I have never even heard of a phone running Linux, unless they are taking all the Linux-based OSs like Android and lumping them together for some misguided reason.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 6:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[These are global figures. Just because you've never seen a Linux phone it doesn't mean that they don't exist.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 6:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's totally true.  But I get all my cell phone news from Engadget, so if there are millions of Linux powered non-US handsets out there then they aren't getting very much press here.<br><br>And if that number doesn't include Android, it's kind of sad to see that the G1's market penetration is still so low that it doesn't even make the chart.  We need some more Android handsets ASAP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was not aware of that many linux ones either. Considering they sold almost 4 times as many as the iPhone last year (when the G1 was not even out) you would expect there to be some mention of them (I'm not in the US either).<br><br>I can only guess there is something China based that does not get any mention over here?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[in response to the comment on android not selling that much: The G1 just came out in october of 2008. These figures would only include the first 3 months of android being out assuming it's even included at all(which I doubt it is). Kinda unfair comparing 3 months of sales to a full year for all the others.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 11:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mac OS X is a mobile operating system? Oh please, the iPhone OS is based off Darwin, which is what OS X is based off, that doesn't make it "Mac OS X". They have different CPU architectures, different APIs, different UI elements etc.<br><br>Call it iPhone OS, which is what it really is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[r3loaded]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 6:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its name is decided by Apple, don't blame Gartner.  They have always liked to have multiple loosly related products on the market with identical names.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[That entire column is screwed up.. a graph showing smartphone sales by Operating System, with the column heading "Company", and entries that are sometimes names of companies and sometimes names of OS'es..<br><br>I'm surprised that Linux's share is decreasing... maybe they're not making them anymore since Android came out?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sirius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Im going to assume apple is going to use some form of this same OS for their next phone as well, so calling it the iPhone OS wouldn't be so bright.<br><br>I'm suprised to see apple so high in 2008 compared to Winmo, 1 handset vs xxxx?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slarity]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[You are mistaken, OS X is a mobile OS, and actually shares _most_ APIs with the desktop OS X version. Download the iPhone SDK and see for yourself... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[This post is misguided... "iPhone OS" and OSX share the vast majority of both system libraries and APIs -- they are far more similar than just being "based on Darwin"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[loosely_coupled]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 6:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh come on r3loaded, don't let the truth get in the way of a good story!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[braden_blyde]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 6:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[It'd be interesting if they actually broke down Symbian since although s40 looks somewhat similar to s60 in some ways due to the themes, they are quite different.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShyGuy91284]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[S40 isn't Symbian-based (or any other "proper" OS), so it's irrelevant to smartphone sales numbers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good point. I forgot about that being the official stance, and didn't notice this was smartphones only.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShyGuy91284]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Symbian's share dropped from 52% across the whole of 2008 to 47% in the last 3 months of 2008. That's an enormous drop from around 57% in Q1 to 47% in Q4...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonConsultant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 9:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Symbian is in theory a smartphone OS but in practice I am pretty sure most symbian phones are used as glorified dumbphones. For proof, try to surf the web on a N73. Or write an email. Or actually check mobile web access stats of any major site...<br><br>I don't think it's a smart phone if you are not at least using web and email on a regular basis. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nikster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 10:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well Nikster, how about trying a Symbian phone newer than the 3 year old N73 then? They all do web and mail just fine FYI.<br><br>Any Symbian device is a smartphone, whether you like it or not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[L]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[symbian ownage still.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[va jj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[In the long run, I wouldn't be surprised if the numbers are Symbian 40%, Linux/Android 40%, Apple 10%, WinMo 5%, RIM 5%. All the players will be selling more smartphones than they do now but the market will be much, much bigger.<br><br>Now that Symbian is free, there's nothing to stop them shoving it into lower cost phones. These figures are a drop in the ocean compared to Nokia's overall phone sales. I wouldn't be surprised if Android ends up in the majority of Motorla phones too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aaron, that is the biggest bullshit prediction i have ever seen.<br><br>What are you basing those numbers off of?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rudolphe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Based on the following facts: <br> - Free operating systems are extremely attractive when you're selling hundreds of millions of phones per year<br> - Apple will never compete for the low-end (it's not their business model)<br> - BB OS and WinMo are both enterprise-niche operating systems]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 1:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, the relatively low cost of a WM license pales in comparison to the advantages of having a large, profit-hungry entity looking after your every need, support call, and feature request. That's why every major retail computer company hasn't switched over to selling Linux machines exclusively. <br><br>Something free is not always better. On phones, the MS license is on the order of $3-5/device (at least it was back in the CE days when I last dealt with it), and can be passed directly through to the consumer (no need for an operational overhead markup). Compare that to developing on open source and looking for community support. In certain situations it is nice, but when you have a million devices out in the field and something goes wrong with the software, don't you want to know that there's someone you can call, someone who's ass is on the line if they don't fix it right away?<br><br>So as much as you might think that Symbian is now poised to take over the smartphone market by being "free", it isn't. The thousands of man-hours already spent learning WM are not going to be tossed aside to save a few bucks per device. And remember - these numbers aren't reflective of the WHOLE cellphone market, just the Smartphone market. WM doesn't work in the non-smartphone market, and I wouldn't be surprised to see some homogenization there, instead of the thousands of one-off OSs that dominate the freephone world.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[130,000,000 smartphones in 2008 sold??? damn]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey' its easy to grow 247 % when you are starting from nothing.  The fact is that there are nearly 2 million more WM users this year than last year, and unless the iPhone outsells WM (which they are not) they are not catching up to the installed base either.<br><br>In fact the quarterly numbers show the iPhone falling behind, with sales down 15%, while WM sales were up 15%, handedly outselling the iPhone by 700 000 units.<br><br>With no price drop from $400 to $200 in sight (like last year) , I think triple digit growth will soon be a fantasy for the iPhone from now on.<br><br>In fact, in Q3 2009, they will have to sell nearly 9 million just to get 100% growth - not going to happen.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Surur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[For a product that hasn't received any major update for a while and doesn't have as much marketing as the RIMs and the iPhones I think winmo is holding its own.<br><br>With partnership backing and also 6.5 and 7 next year it should be interesting for winmo.<br><br>Platform developers already have photon/7 so hopefully no more delays :-)<br><br>Stagnating is not the word I would have chosen but i haven't got an apple up my arse.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[poke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Surur<br><br>I am not going to argue with published figures but I am going to argue about the future.  Are you Nostradamus or something that you can predict the rest of the year for the mobile phone industry?  How do you know there is no price cut for the iPhone coming?  Why do you think that the iPhone won't sell 9 million this year?  You may be completely correct but my point is that you don't know this.  You have absolutely no idea what Apple is planning to release this year.  Do your predictions still hold if Apple was to release the rumored iPhone Nano?<br><br>Seriously, who cares about Windows Mobile?  If the statistics are anything to go by, surely RIM is much more important but I note that you're not having a go at them.  With Windows Mobile not due to be refreshed until the end of the year it is much more likely that Windows Mobile growth will stagnate while people wait for the next version or switch to something more modern.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Kelmon<br>Not 9 million a year, 9 million a quarter. Even RIM only managed 5.8 million in Q4 2008.<br><br><br>"Seriously, who cares about Windows Mobile?" <br><br>Seemlingly more than who cares about the iPhone.<br><br>"If the statistics are anything to go by, surely RIM is much more important but I note that you're not having a go at them. With Windows Mobile not due to be refreshed until the end of the year it is much more likely that Windows Mobile growth will stagnate while people wait for the next version or switch to something more modern."<br><br>Reasons why WM will do well in 2009:<br><br>1) Aggressive action by new large licensees like LG, who pledged 50 new WM phones over the next 3 years.<br><br>Windows Mobile’s strength has always been its licensees, and with 4 out of the big 5 using the OS in some capacity, and like Samsung having pretty good returns on the investment we can be assured the OS will get good support. None of the big mobile phone companies want to have the market eaten by RIM and Apple.<br><br>2) Attack on the low end by netbook king Acer (remember £50 phones, free on contract?)<br><br>Another one of Windows Mobile’s strengths is its adaptability, from very high end to especially low end, low cost devices. Even Google Android devices appear to demand a minimum of HVGA capacitive screens, courtesy of Google. With the global recession devices that address the low end will be increasingly important, and off all the mobile OS’s (except possibly Symbian) none will go as low as Windows Mobile.<br><br>3) Increasing skill by WM licensees like HTC, even on 6.1<br><br>Windows Mobile keeps getting better, even without the OS being upgraded by Microsoft. TouchFlo3D 2 brings us many of the improvements of Windows Mobile 6.5 well before Windows Mobile will be available. This does not happen in isolation, and involves a lot of help by Microsoft, who share this with other Windows Mobile licensees.<br><br>4) A range of new, very attractive devices like the new Touch Diamond 2 and Touch Pro 2.<br><br>One of the main reasons Windows Mobile will do well in 2009 is the great devices set to be released this year, by the likes of HTC, Gigabyte and Toshiba.<br><br>5) Slacking competition<br><br>RIM’s devices are getting boring, with only one main (pretty boring) form factor, Apple’s iPhone form factor is getting very stale, and due to the size of their 3rd party catalogue they are trapped in it, and Android who has NOTHING of note coming out very soon.<br><br>WM 6.5 will in addition bring a much more attractive base UI, which will make it very easy for any company to enter the smartphone market, and will feature an app store, my phone web integration and Zune software. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Surur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Surur has it nailed. WinMo's share is flat over the year but over Q3 and Q4 market share increased by 16% as opposed to the iPhone OS's decrease of nearly 14%. The main threat to Nokia comes from RIM and Samsung who are now utilising S60.  Of course it's worth pointing out 2008 was a relativly poor year for Nokia with nothing replacing the all conquering N95. Obviously the 5800 and N97 will change that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 9:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Surur: I totally agree with you, being that WinMo phones hardly ever gets advertised yet sells so much itz amazing..... if the WinMo phones were advertised more I think that their sales figures were be higher than the other smarthphone companies who had commercials on T.V 24/7...... because when I the Fuze came out and I when to buy it every liked it but they never heard of it before and than iz sad.........]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zelnuts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny, the way people (and media) talk how iPhone and BB swallowing up WM market, but these numbers tells otherwise. And this is base on an ancient 6.1. I think WM still muscles.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[roach]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey Surur, Apple's market share in this segment comes from ONE PHONE. ONE. You go right ahead and show me which SINGLE PHONE running Windows Mobile is doing as well as the iPhone. When you fail, maybe then you'll understand why it's a pretty big deal that Apple's market share is as large as it is.<br><br>Also, show me where WM improved 245% year over year, would you? Because you make it sound like Windows Mobile is actually doing better than OS X mobile. <br><br>FACTS ARE HARD lol.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 11:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ Zak <br><br>"Apple's market share in this segment comes from ONE PHONE. ONE."<br><br>Does it really matter? Is Apple going to license OS X mobile in the future?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[axemt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zak<br>In Europe the Samsung Omnia is outselling the iPhone in Germany and many other countries.  Your US perspective is warping your view of reality.<br><br>How about some facts for you.<br><br>iPhone in 2007 - 6 months of sales, half at $600<br>iPhone 2008 12 months of sales, half at $200.<br><br>So iPhone trebled sales - NO SURPRISE. <br><br>Do you even know how WM phone sales increased between 2002 and 2003?  <br><br>FACTS ARE HARD lol. Go to school.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Surur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Zak<br>In Europe the Samsung Omnia is outselling the iPhone in Germany and many other countries.  Your US perspective is warping your view of reality.<br><br>How about some facts for you.<br><br>iPhone in 2007 - 6 months of sales, half at $600<br>iPhone 2008 12 months of sales, half at $200.<br><br>So iPhone trebled sales - NO SURPRISE. <br><br>Do you even know how WM phone sales increased between 2002 and 2003?  <br><br>FACTS ARE HARD lol. Go to school.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Surur]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 3:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA["Apple's market share in this segment comes from ONE PHONE."<br><br>Yes?  And?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Anderson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[What happened to all those articles saying the iPhone was outselling windows mobile phones last year?<br><br>I was wondering about which handhelds ran linux also. <br><br>I think there is still huge potential for growth in the smartphone market as more devices qualify for the category.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[crash900s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft is holding its own in spite of intense competition.  <br>Wait until they get a good product out there with 6.5  I think their numbers will be much higher.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob e]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really hope that Microsoft is doing something amazing with WinMo 7.  It's been in the over for so long that it really needs to blow iPhone, webOS, and Android totally out of the water to make a difference at this point.<br><br>My number one hope is that they bring WPF to their mobile OS.  If we have that kind of power and freedom while developing mobile UI then it could really have the potential to shoot WinMo back to the leader position.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chefgon_ign]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem that Microsoft has with Windows Mobile 7 is that it's at least a year away.  At the rate that the smartphone industry is running at the moment it is clear that Microsoft needs to up their game.  That it is still going to be almost 9-months before Windows Mobile 6.5 arrives is simply amazing, particularly given how underwhelming it is.  I honestly do not think that people are going to wait for Windows Mobile 7.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[yes WPF for winmo was supposed to be available two years ago if i'm not mistaken. Come on microsoft give us WPF]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aatnet]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[These statements are not true b/c the majority of people who own and like WinMo phones know nothing about WM6.5/ 7 so they would continue to buy WinMo phones and not "wait" for something that we who read tech news knows what is coming out but the average WinMo consumer never heard of before..... plus WinMo always does better in the Q3 and Q4 of the year so 2009 will be no different seeing that during those times is when the best WinMo phones comes out especially Touch Pro2/ Diamond2, with the bigger screen( other than the HD,Euro only)  that every1 has been waiting for on a WinMo device]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zelnuts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 10:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whoa! Symbian?! Wow! I thought the most used was WinMo. I stand corrected.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[2009 will be very very interesting... Nokia is very sneaky, it talks up a lot of their smartphone while on the side they load their feature phones with so many capabilities comparable to smartphones, also their mid-range phones are starting to be kitted out with s60 ar affordable prices. <br><br>Example, the Nokia 5800 here in the UK is given away for free on a £15 a month plane for 18months. £15 A MONTH. no wonder their selling like hot cakes here.<br><br>iphone 3Gen, Nokia n97, Android magic(G2), Winmo 6.5..... 2009 will be very interesting indeed.<br><br>I must say though, the US market is really helping the iPhone and the G1, am sure 3/4 of iphone are sold in that market]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[biggwill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's why the Nokias sell at huge volume.  Decent phones that are affordable.<br>You don't have to get some super expensive plan.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Mcp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this also shows how much Blackberry has become popular recently.<br>I look around the phones held by business guys at lunchtime, and yeah, they're heavily into their berries.<br><br>Developers are going to go to the phone that sells their apps.  At the moment it's iPhone with it's App Store, but all it needs is for the other systems to get their own App Stores up and working smoothly.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Mcp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[RIM is releasing a blackberry app store.. but with OTA ability to update and install on the blackberry already an app store is kinda redundent.. The only thing holding back the Blackberry right now (atleast on my curve) is the subpar internet browser since most of the time it just mimics the standards pocketpc format instead of full html... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Numus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting to note Blackberry (RIM) is more sold then winmo and  iphone.. probably helped by massive business purchases of the blackberry for employees]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Numus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[No kidding.  I note that the Mac vs. PC idiots are already out in this discussion talking about Windows Mobile and the iPhone but RIM is the real talking point here.  Whatever they are doing at the moment it is clearly working since they've sold almost the same units as Microsoft and Apple combined.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/13/gartner-posts-worldwide-mobile-os-numbers-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[little not. <br><br>Linux are on a lot of Phones, mainly motorola, (the Z-series i.e. Z10) and Networn branded handsets, its just adapted by the manufactueres]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[biggwill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 13th 2009 8:15AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
