<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[no dude, SIMD does NOT work "by executing multiple computing instructions at once." this implies that different instructions are executed at the same time, which is not the case.<br><br>it works exactly how it sounds, by executing multiple instances of the SAME instruction on different pieces of data. (single instruction, multiple data. durr)<br><br>but yes, it's useful for vector applications, like graphics where you want to run the same instruction on every pixel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems to be very similar to ARM's cortex family. <br>I wonder how this 'improvement' will affect battery life and how will it compare with upcoming cortex A9 which will probably appear on the market on the same time. This will be an interesting fight.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wishmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 4:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[" while apparently allows for onscreen graphic images to be "done faster." "<br><br>Yes, SIMD, exactly what a GPU does too.... so intel is making a somehow different kind of graphics accelerator for MIDs.  Dont know why this article needed to have that skepticism...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[laxsu19]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 5:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Woot!  SIMD-on-a-35-pin-SIMM!!  Who wouldn't want a gaming-machine-in-a-wall-wart?<br><br>[hint: count the 'pins' on the image]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Fruzzetti]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank you for saying this =P Seriously, how the hell could you guys (Engadget) get this so wrong? Do some damned research.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Razor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 5:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was meant as a reply to Kevin =P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Razor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel SIMD Accelerator promises to boost MID performance]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/18/intel-simd-accelerator-promises-to-boost-mid-performance/</guid><description><![CDATA[someone's going to say that this sucks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[someone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 18th 2009 9:57PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
