<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is this really a surprise at all?  Every time a Symbian phone is brought to AT&T, *something* goes wrong with it.  Every.  Single.  Time.  Despite the fact that the unlocked versions have typically been working fine for months.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Omagus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 25th 2009 11:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[So has many Windows Mobile phones ...  Maybe AT&T has issues.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NuShrike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2009 1:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[The question is why this phone would be relevant at all once it comes out.<br><br>The E71x is rumored to be $149 or $199 after subsidies.  It will be classified as a "smartphone", so unlimited data will be $30/month.<br><br>The unlocked E71 now costs less than $350 online.   Like with other unlocked phones, unlimited data on AT&T is $10 or $15 per month, depending on whether you also have unlimited messaging.<br><br>The price difference in the data plan adds up to $360 or $480 over the 2-year contract period for the E71x (and the longer you go without renewing, the higher the difference).   More than enough to pay for the unlocked version.<br><br>So the question is why would *ANYONE* get a by-then-obsolete (considering the E75, N97, etc) phone for the privilege of paying more for it?<br><br>(Maybe roughly the same people who bite into this iPhone craze, much for the same reason.. )<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tor Slettnes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2009 1:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sure, the E71 is yesterday's news, but not obsolete.  There is no newer version of the E71 (the downgrade of the E63 doesn't really make the E71 obsolete - with the exception of the 3.5mm plug).  The Matrix Pro will compete with the E71, but the two have similar features and neither can really be called 'superior'.<br><br>While I do agree with your data-$$-math, but remember that many people will buy from ATT because it's convenient and they need a phone NOW, and there are still others who (believe it or not) think that they need to buy a phone from ATT if that's the service provider they use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wobbly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2009 9:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[first of all, i completely agree with getting the unlocked and foregoing the 2-yr contract. <br><br>but i guess the other perspective is, some people for various reasons don't want to shell out the $350 right off the bat for a device. some would rather pay a little more per bill than all in a lump sum. think of it like a loan paid back in payments of $15 a month. an obvious example of someone who would choose this is one whose work pays for their phone bill. their company may not pay for a smartphone, but may subsidize up to 100 or 150 a month for phone expenses. (i actually know someone in this situation) in this case i can see why they'd opt for the at&t version of the e71.<br><br>that said, maybe i'm a little selfish, but being a proud owner of the unlocked e71 it's nice that i'll be different for that much longer. once at&t carries it i'm expecting to see more people with it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[annicus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, that workbook you see in the background is a New Hire guidebook and typically all of the leaks that come out of the stores are the new kids and I emphasize KIDS that are in 'training'. So, yeah the handsets real. AT&T is probably just pissed it cant get more of its bloatware on the Goddamnd thing. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2009 2:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Nokia E71x misses rumored launch date on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/25/nokia-e71x-misses-rumored-launch-date-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's MORE!?<br><br>The E71x will have the AT&T Navigator, MEdia Mall shortcut, "MEdia Net" to replace "Web", Cingular Video, and last but not least, SIM lock.<br><br>What more do they want!?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tor Slettnes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 26th 2009 4:20PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
