<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[That sounds very encouraging, can't wait to see it in action, perhaps with some touch technology integrated. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Swiftor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thumbs up!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bad Beaver]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[cant wait until they have digital newspapers/books..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Welcome to Engadget.<br><br><a href="http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=e-book&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/search/?q=e-book&invocationType=wl-gadget&searchsubmit</a>=]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Prokanda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 4:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[that article just blew my mind]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mynk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Call me when a 8.5 x 11 device using this is $200USD....until then I have stopped caring about eInk.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RyletinSTL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[until e-ink gets to 300dpi it's still hard to read those small fonts on a 6" screen let alone iphone<br>or pdas for ebooks based on jpgs.  a 10" or 11" should work...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 1:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can I say "color kindle"?<br>Man I just cannot wait til this reaches us poor mortals.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fskn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[By the time it's done you'll be all grown up and find you aren't waiting for it anymore I bet.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whenever I hear the magical time of "5 years", the cynic in me says "good luck, see you in 13"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darkcrow101]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 3:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Awesome.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hackettman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[The old CMYK vs RGB argument?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, from reading Engadget's summary it looks like CMY.  I hope that's wrong and they are missing the black.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraigJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 7:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know its not an argument, right? Its just physics: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractive_color" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractive_color</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 9:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is to argue about it? RGB are the primaries for additive color, CMY are the primaries for subtractive color. They're used in different situations. If the device is emitting light through a transmissive LCD panel, then additive color is used. If the device has a passive display such as E-ink, then subtractive color is used.<br><br>Why isn't it CMYK? Either they didn't feel the need to discuss K because we already have black E-ink displays, or they feel K isn't needed. In printing, black ink is used in addition to CMY because the black from combining the three colors often isn't very black, and printing black text would also require precise registration of the three colors. Black ink is also cheaper. Registration isn't so much of an issue here, so if CMY produces an adequate black then there's no need for K.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WilfordBrimley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Let me throw in CMYKOG, or hexachrome.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wwhat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 9:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[In most applications that I have seen, black from CMY is a muddy looking sorta dark brownish green that is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike black.  <br><br>Of course, this is unlike any other application I've seen before.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraigJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 2:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it retains images when turned off, that pretty much means nigh-unlimited battery life, no?  Just drop in a solar charger on par with the cheapest of calculators.<br><br>Then again, I'm a pretty slow reader.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[Tyler,<br>CMYK are subtractive primary colors, whereas RGB are additive.  This means that RGB are the primaries for when the colors/light are generated (e.g. a backlit LCD).  CMYK is subtractive, meaning that given an external light source (e.g. sunlight), CMYK is used to subtract from the light that is refracted from of the object.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason DiCioccio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[As I said before wait for color, video, and faster refresh rates:)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 12:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what OLEDs are for.<br>Refresh rates should be a non-issue for something like an e-book reader as long as it's less than the time required to turn the page of a p-book.<br>Video is the wrong application for e-paper - constant power drain and state changes will wear your e-paper out faster than folding it.<br>Basically, your princess is in another castle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[randombloke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 7:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ricoh develops brighter, lighter, color e-paper]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/30/ricoh-develops-brighter-lighter-color-e-paper/</guid><description><![CDATA[i love ricoh]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alesstil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 7:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
