<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[[insert economy argument against superfluous and fellatius product]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Haikibutsu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 10:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[glad i'm not the only one sick of reading those comments]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncontrol]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 11:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[Do you need to have a crappy economy to remind to you not to buy useless products like these?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 8:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[looks decent i like the multiple charging options and expanded memory options]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 10:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[third]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 5:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[fail]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[vbtrash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 6:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed.<br><br>Turd.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[Euhm...March 31st? I think I missed a memo here...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[astute.spam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 11:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[When they have 300 dpi color e-paper in these things, maybe. But having only 3 hours of playback (<a href="http://www.iwantoneofthose.com/new-arrivals/album/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.iwantoneofthose.com/new-arrivals/album/index.html</a>) seems pretty useless to me...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 11:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[what's wrong w/3 hrs of playback? it's not like you're gonna take this out of the house. and even if you did, squeezing more than 3 hrs. of pics onto 4 gigs means that 300 dpi screen won't do shit for you...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tudor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 8:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually a really neat thing if you're into caring around a photo album. I met the guy who developed this (or at least got a chinese manufacturer to make it)  in the International section at CES in January.  Oddly no Engadget or Gizmodo guys to be found around there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 12:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about answering the first question that you'd ask about this product:  What's the resolution?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Information Central]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 2:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Digital Album: it's a digiframe, just more capacious]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/31/digital-album-its-a-digiframe-just-more-capacious/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this is a great idea. My parents still keep tons of photo albums around from way back.<br><br>Which fades first, the ink from the photos or the memory in an SD card? SD cards are so cheap now, it's about the same price to buy an SD card for each of your albums as it is to print them (of course you don't have a physical print). But, if you had one of these albums you could keep a CD case of SD cards around and slap 'em in. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Spacek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 1st 2009 7:34AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
