http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/ Engadget Comments for Samsung's new SyncMaster 70 displays consume 33% less energy, 0% less pizzazz http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/]]>Apr 6th 2009 11:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
Dude, the Apple fanboys are often accused of being fans of shit, but you've gone too far.



@the non-scat freaks still reading:
Does anybody else think that the display within a display on the fake(?) screen image looks like it has a huge crack across the LCD? Poor choice of graphics, Samsung.]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
@Giga; Welcome to Endgadet, Samsung is notorious for picking the worse korean models out there. Go for Sharp, Panasonic, or Sony if you want some Asian electronics model hotness]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 2:17PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:42AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/"Contrast Ration"
"Pizzazz"

Is this article about food? :-P
]]>Apr 6th 2009 11:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 1:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/wow how immature. ]]>Apr 6th 2009 6:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
As in all cases where some dude posts "I'd do her" or "I'd hit it" the real question is, would she do you? The answer to that question is universally "no"]]>Apr 6th 2009 6:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 8:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:43AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 3:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
]]>Apr 6th 2009 11:45AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:51AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
On a side note, she's a very un-Asian looking Asian woman.]]>Apr 6th 2009 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 7:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:58AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 11:56AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 1:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/


Uh, what else is there to comment about? The fact that it's just another 'green' LCD monitor isn't all that exciting. And two, most high/ highly ranked comments around here are those which are more funny then informative. You have a better chance of getting positive ratings for sarcastic remarks or for saying what we're all thinking.

]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
So it's not just engadget readers who are thinking that.]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
Price: ($1.00 = 1300 Won)
P2070G: 358,000 Won = about $280
P2370G: 427,000 Won = about $330

Thickness is 300mm ( = 1.2")

They say you can save 120W / day (8hr of usage, 16hr stand-by)

P2370G supports Full-HD.]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 6:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
I'd be more excited for a good looking sammy monitor that had 176x176 viewing angles, a quality colour rep, LED backlit, and reslutions to fit everyone's budget.

]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:32PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 12:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
TN panels should start being phased out. P-MVA, S-PVA or S-IPS panel LCDs should really start taking over. All the news about these '50,000:1' contrast ratio monitors does NOT impress me at all.

I'm still rocking my 24" LG L246WP P-MVA panel. Absolutely stunning monitor and dead perfect colour rendition. No way I'm ever going back to TN panels.]]>Apr 6th 2009 12:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
the other flavors of LCDs are nice...though I would just prefer for larger cheaper OLED screens, I saw the Sony one IRL and for once my jaw dropped.

Also I'm tired of all affordable computer LCDs having 60hertz refresh times....why can TVs have 120 (which I hate because it makes all film look like video) but not PC monitors were it actually helps (well...with gaming hahaha :-D )


]]>Apr 6th 2009 1:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
My SyncMaster 906BW is one of the older, not-as-efficient models and it only has a 2000:1 contrast ratio vs. these with their 50000:1!

I'll be especially excited when OLED becomes viable at a reasonable proce point. Those have something like a 1000000:1 contrast ratio while consuming around 80% less power.]]>Apr 6th 2009 1:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 1:05PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 1:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 1:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 1:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 2:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/
NO MORE TN PANELS.]]>Apr 6th 2009 3:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 3:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 6th 2009 6:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/06/samsungs-new-syncmaster-70-displays-consume-33-less-energy-0/Apr 7th 2009 11:24AM