<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll take a guess that even with its slick-off-to-the-left touchpad, glossy screen, and Vista, this laptop still won't get the same venom the Dell Studio XPS 13 got from josh last week, that was brutal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[freighttrain2126]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 3:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess "above average heat" is a polite way of saying "keep the damn thing away from your nads, unless they can take the 110 degree heat the ass-end of this thing pumps out." And 2.5 hours is pretty pathetic battery life for an ultraportable that just barely beats it's 8+ hour Atom packing companions in everything but video scores. I feel bad for AMD, but this thing is just a big ol' sack of fail. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 3:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Have you actually used an Atom? It's laggy even in Firefox. Fuck that.<br><br>The Neo doesn't multitask well enough, but at least it's SMOOTH (read: instant) in doing whatever casual tasks you throw at it. My trusty 3000+ (1.8Ghz Single core) told me that.<br><br>Other chaps from LaptopReview managed to get 3+ hours on Youtube, so it's obviously not that bad.<br><br>And 8 hours for Atoms my arse, unless you plug in one of those fugly batteries and run that idiotic MobileMark virtually-no-load-at-all test. What a joke you are.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikeo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 3:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny, my NC10 special edition gets through an entire work day (8-9 hours) without being plugged it. Maybe it runs on leprechaun magic or something. As for being laggy, I have 5 tabs open in firefox and a movie playing on VLC  as I write this, and it's running smooth as you please. <br><br>Go back to scaring small children and chasing livestock you ponce, and leave the tech talk to the adults.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 7:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is thick and sleek]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 3:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[You just know where this is going to go]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[insky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 5:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mildly interesting. However, you can now pick up Toshiba Protege R500s for under a $1000 (without optical), which eats up the DV2 in everything (including weight and battery life) except graphics performance. I don't know, the DV2 looks like a decent college notebook. Netbooks with Atom processors are PURE garbage.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[molecule-eye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heck, I'm surprised that HP have the nerve to release another "above average heat" DV series laptop/notebook/whatever. Especially when the list of unsatisfied customers keeps growing from earlier DV series that all seemed to suffer the same problems due to poor design, manufacture, etc.<br><br>Check these links 1st, if you are thinking of buying HP <a href="http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=233974" rel="nofollow">http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=233974</a> or <a href="http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/bizsupport/questionanswer.do?threadId=1191277" rel="nofollow">http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/bizsupport/questionanswer.do?threadId=1191277</a><br><br>After months of getting to know each and every HP support team from here to Delhi and back, HP will still not admit to a design/manufacture  fault and say that they treat each support case individually.<br><br>If you want my opinion Dell takes some beating and thier support is one of the best I have encountered, (speaking from a business point of view).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dom1nion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 4:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow and i just got myself a dv1 mini great review guys]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shamon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those goofy circles are lame.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 5:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on AMD, you have to do better than that.<br><br>Especially the mobile processors.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 6:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why have you picked only the worst bits from these reviews?<br><br>Why not mention how it can handled 3D gaming well with the 3410 graphics chip, ran Photoshop/Video Encoding apps much faster than Atom, how it scored 3.40 hours battery life in PCMag's testing (which from experience is much better than most netbooks), how it runs a full 64bit OS with huge 4GB of RAM, how the heat is MOSTLY provided by the 3410 graphics chip NOT the Neo, how the typing experience with "exceptional" for an ultraportable etc. etc. And also bear in mind future Neo based systems will be cheaper and use the cooler low end graphics chip as well.<br><br>tsk tsk]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dotAaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 8:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1<br><br>Honestly though, why does every review of any product (well most, there are....certain exceptions) from every site always have to highlight the negative.  Just because something has it's share of flaws, doesn't mean they outweigh the advantages.  If it's not what you're looking for, then don't buy it but don't trash it because it doesn't fit in your criteria of you what you want out of it.  HP is actually doing a very good job of offering as wide a range of laptops as possible, with a variety of form factors, each with assorted specs and price points, and this is just filling in one the the bigger gaps.  It would be alot worse if they tried to fit all their customers into one little box and tell them what they want...you know, cause nobody would ever do THAT ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KeegdnaB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[I setup a room on FriendFeed which shows a lot more early reviews.  You can find it here: <a href="http://budurl.com/HPdv2FF" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/HPdv2FF</a> The pull quotes are positive and I suggest you read the entire article to get the full story. <a href="http://budurl.com/HPdv2FF" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/HPdv2FF</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Moorhead]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[One thing for anyone wanting to use this is a HTPC. Laptop Mag's review says it's jerky on 1080p... Guess I'll stick with a Mac Mini...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PCIV]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 11:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[But apparently it plays like silk at 1079p, which is good enough for most.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[molecule-eye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 5:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP Pavilion dv2 review roundup]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/08/hp-pavilion-dv2-review-roundup/</guid><description><![CDATA[Huh, that's funny. This user was able to play back 1080p VC1 and H264 with hardware acceleration locked at 800mhz and throttled GPU with no lost frames...<br><br><a href="http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=368400" rel="nofollow">http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=368400</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 8th 2009 12:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
