<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[weird screen?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lxuke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[i would have put the nikon logo on the side instead of the bottom.<br><br>so that when its flipped... its still sideways, rather than upside down.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 11:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Nikon D5000 has a 230K pixel screen, the Canon Rebel T1i (500D) has a 920k pixel screen.  Bummer.. I think the 920k screen is much nicer then a swiveling screen.  I know there are a lot of other feature differences but I really dig the high resolution screen on the Canon for liveview manual focusing and post picture focus checking.  I was really hoping Nikon would opt to do the same.  To each their own, they both seem to be great cameras.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also, here is a side by side spec comparison:<br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=nikon_d5000%2Ccanon_eos500d&show=all" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=nikon_d5000%2Ccanon_eos500d&show=all</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[The T1 is a fine camera but once my Red Scarlet will finally be delivered I will not need any camera or videocams no more; and until then my beloved Casio EX- F1 never made me wish any other dSLR . I don't even think that I will sell it when the RED Scarlet arrives.<br>I'm not a pro photographer , but I often use photography as part of my profession and I'm convinced that there is no Canon, Nikon, or Olympus that can offer more than my EX-F1; and I could'nt care less if the Casio name does'nt carry the same cachet or mystique of other photo brands:  for that price, or even for the double of its price, the EX-F1 is the best shooter money can buy.<br>Of course the Scarlet, with its HD prerogatives, will be something else, but if I should have payied VAT and did'nt have the possibility to detract from my taxes most of its price I doubt that I would have spent that kind of money, specially now that 1000 euros can get you an ass kicking EX-F1.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KilgoreTrout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[~~~~~~~~~~body-only price of ¥76,320 ($762)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br><br>how come？                ¥76,320 ($762]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yuan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice $729 for a body is a steep, considering you can get a D90 body for $890<br>Also couldn't they make the screen 3 inch and 920k, instead of 2.7 inchs and 230K<br>Going to be a cool battle, Nikon D90 vs Nikon D5000 vs Canon T1i :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[People talk about "this camera from brand X versus that camera from brand Y" but that is really only useful for new users or people with enough cash and need to keep multiple systems. Its interesting from a technical and fanboy perspective, but if you have a lens investment in any system, then you're pretty much stuck. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YpoCaramel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 7:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[The exception to this investment issue is when Canon 5DMkII owners realized that it's an actual *advantage* to own Nikon lenses, since it's the best way to achieve manual aperture since Canon won't let you do it with actual Canon lenses.  Doh!  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[holyzoo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Swivel screen? Who cares.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr-slice]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[tripod users.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan V]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[and pretty much everybody else who makes photos from unconventional angle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 5:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[11point auto focus? Nikon finally improved on the 3PT AF on D60.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mehul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[No kidding. My 4 1/2 year old, entry-level, falling-apart Pentax has 11 points and a glass prism. It's been a race to the bottom with lower specs and more megapixels ever since.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yem]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 4:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[The D50 had 5-point AF.  The D40 was intentionally dumbed down to 3-point AF to provide a 'more simple DSLR', which was carried through to the D40x (10MP D40).  The D60 was essentially a redux of the D40x with a few added features (sensor cleaner, stop-anim mode) so it also had the same 3-point AF.<br><br>The D5000 appears to be a different animal entirely - like a dumbed down D90, tweaked for video, and crammed in a D50 body with a swivel screen.  It probably doesn't replace the D60, but rather the D60 might continue to drop in price and displace the D40 as the entry level DSLR.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[smileytang]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 4:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Huh, it would seem that the "info" button has made its return. Which makes sense considering the absence of an eye sensor.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA["just slightly less than the Canon T1i, which has a higher-res sensor and can shoot 1080p video"<br><br>Yes... at 20fps. <br><br>Pointless. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sisyphus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who cares, it's 1080p full HD vs. D5000's 720p. The T1i is superior.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Saad Rabies]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Saad Rabis:<br>Wow, you've missed the point on several occasions.<br>20fps video is essentially useless, 24 is considered the minimum for smooth video, and even that is arguable.<br>Also, Neither of these cameras have had any tests done, so to say either one is superior is ridiculous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[>> "Who cares, it's 1080p full HD vs. D5000's 720p. The T1i is superior."<br><br>Um... no.  <br><br>More pixels at a lower frame-rate does NOT equal better.<br><br>Besides... what do you need 1920x1080 for anyway?  Are you gonna shoot movies to put on Blu-Ray?  720p at 24p is fine for the web... and even fine for your TV.  The T1i will shoot 720p at 30 fps... but even that is a weird frame-rate.<br><br>It's funny... Canon keeps dancing around 24p but never gets it right... you can have either 20fps or 30fps with Canon.<br><br>And none of it matters because they both have CMOS sensors... jiggle city.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHY swivel to the bottom???  Ridiculous.  You can't put the thing down without adjusting it first.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Denver_80203]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree entirely.  The Olympus method of swiveling the screen out to the side is much more practical.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RobJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[The side is where the buttons go, and have gone for a very long time. Changing that would make this the only Nikon camera in years that doesn't have them there, and that kind of thing is important to people who shoot a lot with multiple bodies, or for getting people to upgrade to a d90/d300.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jollyllama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, Oly's E-30 LCD flips to side and DPReview quite liked the overall layout of controls.<br><br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse30/page4.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse30/page4.asp</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 6:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Makes perfect sense. To the bottom is in a better position to look down when holding the camera chest high, down doesn't cover any buttons, and down means to can still easily look through the viewfinder.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CraigJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 11:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not sure why one would need a swivel view finder, especially to the bottom?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Swivel screens LCDs can be useful when you're trying to shoot over a crowd, or really close to the ground. This actually helps make Live View on dSLRs a pretty useful feature. I mean otherwise it really just cripples the camera.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess this is the best buy over the D60, good thing I waited before buying my camera :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitrix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 7:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[why cant slrs have screens like the canonn s5 is i currently use at my school?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nimer_55]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm hoping that Nikon's decision to use 720p isn't going to carry over to the D400 (or however they choose to name the D300 replacement) when it arrives later this year (I hope).  It would make sense that they kept the D5000 at 720p/24 fps as that would prevent cannibalization of the D90's sales and presumably the D400's sales.<br><br>The new swivel system is interesting, but still not as flexible as the side-mounted hinge..  Frankly I think even the Sony a350 implementation is better, as you could tilt the screen up or down even when the camera is on a flat surface (like on a table).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[napkindoodle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[The D5000 uses the same sensor has the D90. And so presumable has the same limitations with its rolling shutter. Pushing the resolution higher would probably only make matters worse.<br><br>The eventual D400 will have a brand a new sensor. Which I suspect will have significant improvements in this area.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[fly pass.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DonBox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[So how does this thing compare to the D90? Better deal or what?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Konstantin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[D90<br>+ slightly bigger, and much higher resolution LCD<br>+ Physical Controls for ISO, White Balance, Shooting Mode, Metering Mode, AF mode, and quality.<br>+ Bigger viewfinder<br>+ Secondary command dial on the front<br>+ Screw Drive motor for older AF lenses<br>+ DOF preview<br>+ Top mounted passive LCD<br>+ Slightly faster Continous shooting (4.5fps vs 4fps)<br>+ High Speed flash sync<br>+ Optional battery grip<br><br>D5000<br>+ Swivel out display<br>+ A bit smaller and lighter<br>+ Cheaper]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's it - Nikon's lost it - they have to stop making these gimmick cameras and go back to making rock solid proper cameras with the bells and whistles. We don't need these kinds of toy cameras that are half-arsed. Why do they keep doing this? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[A flip out LCD is probably one of the most useful things they've come out with recently. As I said above, it can be extremely handy for shooting over crowds. And sure you could use a right angle finder for close to ground shots, but then that's something else you have to buy and then carry around.<br><br>DSLRs didn't remain stagnant in the past. So why is change so unwelcome now?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[>> "Nikon's lost it - We don't need these kinds of toy cameras that are half-arsed. Why do they keep doing this?"<br><br>Doing what?  They have a full line of nice cameras.  This D5000 is a great camera too.  If you don't like the flip-out screen or video recording... don't use those features.  It's still a DSLR that takes regular pictures.<br><br>Or, you can get a D60, D90, D300, D700, D3, or D3X.<br><br>Choices, my friend... choices...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scrip]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just curious, but what is "half-arsed" with D5000? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunthor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm more confused with the naming convention. D5000 sounds like it should be above the D700 but instead it's between the D80 and D90.<br><br>Why didn't they just call it the D85 or the D80V etc?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[arkweld]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@arkweld<br><br>Either of those names would make it sound like a successor to the D80, which is is not. Indeed the D80 still has numerous advantages over this body.<br><br>To someone not familiar with Nikon's naming convention, it does sound better. And perhaps that is the point. Anyone who is actually serious about their photography is bound to do a lot more research than just someone who wants it for casual shooting. Plus it has a "numerical advantage" over its main competition (eg. Canon 1000D).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 3:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Err, well maybe not the "main" completion. But you get the idea. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Plothole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 3:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cunthor,<br><br>It's half-arsed because:<br><br>- No built in lens motor<br>- Only 0.78x viewfinder magnification with only 95% coverage<br>- 2.7" LCD instead of the 3", with a very low 230k pixel count instead of the 900k (who cares about flip out? That's a Canon thing)<br>- Pop Up flash doesn't work with the "Creative Lighting" set up<br>- Only 720p with 24 fps and no choice to change it to any other ratio or 30fps (I wanted the choice) <br><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KN]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sticking with 720p is poor form but perhaps at this price point they weren't going to up the DMovie too much over the D90.  At least it now adds VR stabilisation during DMovie shooting which should help a lot (as long as it works well).  However while film makers love their 24fps, more video producers shoot for 25p and 30p to match TV broadcasting etc  I can't imagine why I would shoot someones wedding in 24p etc  For PAL countries, unless you are actually going to film, 24p is just not required...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's it - I'm getting a Canon 5D Mark II. Better image quality and less whistles.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[test]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 1:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really though - the D5000 and the Canon 5D Mark II are several classes (and several thousand dollars) apart. The D5000 isn't meant to compete with it at all ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elithrar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even though I'm a Canon fan the 30fps thing really bugs me, I'm glad Nikon got it right. Maybe Canon will give people what they want and flash 24p in both the 500D and the 5DMk2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jess]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[to be exact, canon 500D shoot 720p video at 30fps, better than nikon D5000's 24fps, yet canon offers 1080p at 20 fps, although it is crippled, but it is an extra.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jac]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 6:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Jac<br><br>In video, 24fps is preferred over 30fps.  In fact, the thing everyone was complaining about with the 5DmarkII was the lack of 24fps.  24fps gives a closer representation to film and movies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Temple]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 8:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[While I would like 24p in my choices...<br><br>I bet half of the people who complain about it doesn't even know what advantages and Disadvantages come with that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ming Han Chung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/14/nikon-d5000-articulates-its-way-into-reality/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another 12MP camera by Nikon?  They need to catch up to Canon's 20+MP dSLRs- I know I know, everyone says Megapixel isn't the end-all, but it doesn't hurt that's for sure.  And I've been a Nikon user since I was 11 (29 yrs & counting).<br><br>And let's make that 20-25 MP camera under 3 grand- not over 8 grand.<br><br>Remember folks, digital is an expensive- not an investment.  I'm here all week.  :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Chunky]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 2:54AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
