<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[$99 isnt that really cheap, looks like a good card]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn it engadget, where is the joke about "old card/new sticker", and "same card/ new sticker??"  joke ati made]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[risk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[heres the pic engadget didn't link<br><br><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/gallery/20090414013935_8_1,0101-205977-6134----jpg-.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/gallery/20090414013935_8_1,0101-205977-6134----jpg-.html</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[risk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I did link to that pic... check out the gallery.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joseph.flatley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[So the 4870 is worse than the 4770?  <br><br>DAMNIT AMD!  JUST CALL IT THE 4970, FOR GOD'S SAKE]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RoboDan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@RoboDan: No, the 4770 is actually a step below the 4850 in performance.  A small step, but a step.  Not sure why it needs a dual slot fan though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[You crazy? $99 for a video card is cheap.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[br4nd0nh347]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think this is that expensive Alex.<br><br>$99.00 for performance on a card matching that of a $200.00 card form its competitors or its own lineup is a great deal.<br><br>If this was available in other sectors. I'd be really pleased. Like buying a $500,000 house for $250,000 without having to live in Detriot. Honestly, I'd like to buy a car for $10,000 that performs like $20,000.00 car too or a $20,000.00 car that performs like a $40,000.00 car.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe he meant to say "$99; isn't that really cheap?" Just had some bad grammar goin on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sfmalive]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 10:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA["Recession friendly..." LOLZ!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[OneLove]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 21st 2009 10:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Which is better...this or the Nvidia 280  added to a Hewlett Packard Quad Core with 4Gb Ram?<br><br>I already know either will run Crysis on my rig..but which kicks more ass for the money?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quantumphysics]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Uhh... the 280 costs over four times as much.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Right, the 280 costs four times as much, and I think it would be better to get 4 of these than one 280, because this is pretty good already. But really the better thing would be two 4870s or a 4870x2.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iofthestorm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't know you could call a hewlett packard a "rig".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lawyer bird]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD ftw<br><br><br>!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[ATI...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hamerhead_12]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 7:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD owns ATI. They're one in the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 9:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[not cheap but nice performance for the money !]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HSLBH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just give it few hours. ;)<br><br>All should have learned by now that ATI (or AMD) never sell at initial price - very shortly prices fall down considerably.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not sure what you game on, but a gaming grade graphics card is usually $150 plus.  This card follows the AMD staple of Bang for your Buck.  It is not great, but for $99 it will do far far better than any other card under $100.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laughing Man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[$99 sounds good to me. hopefully this runs cooler than my Gforce 8800 GTS]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Giroro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[$99 is cheap compared to some other high ripoff prices of other graphics cards... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[(read: NVidia)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RoboDan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll have to wait for real benchmarks to believe it.. with a 128-bit memory bus I would think it would be crippled compared to the 4850, but if these benches are correct.. then it outperforms the 8800gt/9800gt better than the 4850 does, which wouldn't make sense at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryudeshi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[memory bus width means nothing with GDDR5,  if GDDR3 provided only 50GB/s bandwith with 128bit bus, then GDDR5 provides 2 times that, totalling 100GB/s.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[risk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[It will be slightly slower that the 4850 according to early press.  But it will be slightly faster than the 4830 and most likely will replace the 4830 in the AMD line up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[glenn s]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[GDDR5 runs at four times its rated speed. It can run slower (but why would they want to?) and still beat G/DDR3 in performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcpb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is standard AMD proceedure.  The sub-$100 market was the last that received an update.  And just to clarify the HD 4850 kills 9800/8800 GT.  The HD 4850 is the reason that the 9800 GTX was redesigned and re-released as the 9800 GTX+.  And true to form, the pricing war between the HD 4850 and 9800 GTX+ is the reason why both are now $129 to $150.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laughing Man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, you guys are right, i always thought the 4850 used the same GDDR5 memory that the 4870 did and I overlooked it on the spec sheet..<br><br>But still, those benches, compared to benches I have seen in the past for the 4850 vs 9800GT don't seem right at all, unless changes in firmware have made some significant performance boosts in AMD's GPUs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryudeshi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[exciting!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMDs processors are terrible..just saying.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bobert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD processors are not terrible at all.  They do not perform as well as a core i7 but they are up to par against the core 2 quads.  Most people won't even know the difference in performance if they are just web browsing, watching Hulu, doing some casual gaming, etc.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boomerz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[your terrible...just saying]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lhfan04]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I might be daft but why on earth would the marketing department let those images be made like that? <br><br>Red draws images of heat and fire in people's minds.<br>Smoke brings images of fire and heat as well.<br><br>Heat in a video card is a terrible feature. Had they simply made the smoke blue it would make much more sense. Of course, ATI's logo is red so I'll give them some slack if they wanted to stick with the family branding design.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bernie16wb]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're forgetting that stuff on fire looks cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rcarm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[*sets own PC on fire*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pillow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 21st 2009 8:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe it's time to upgrade from my nVidia GeForce 7600 GT?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dafrety]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 4:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[check Neweggs open box specials. I got a Sapphire 4850 unused, in perfect condition, it's been running over a year now and I got it for an amazing $99.  Outperforms this 4770, if I'm reading the press release right.  It's hella fast and doesn't choke on CoD or FSX]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeesusfreek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[maybe its time to upgrade from my x800xt]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, yes it is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laughing Man]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Alternatively you can get gf9600. Already available from many manufacturers. Not bad card.<br><br>But I'd rather wait for benchmarks. If the baby really comparable to 9800gt, then it's a great deal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JJ<br><br>sorry dude thats an AGP... <br>were in the PCI express era.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Chappelle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe it's time to upgrade my GeForce 4 MX]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[extinctdoughnut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 21st 2009 11:12AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe it's time to upgrade from my Riva TNT2...<br><br>Seriously, I've got to do that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maxter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2009 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[God AMD's graphics cards are so amazing..the price to performance ratio is ridiculous!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeesusfreek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Fudzilla is saying it'll be released on April 28th:<br><br><a href="http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13258&Itemid=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13258&Itemid=1</a><br><br>Then again, they got their info from a Japanese site with thoroughly dodgy performance graphs that seems to have taken their article down now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[404]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's not bad at all for a hundred dollar card.<br><br>Me likey]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KeegdnaB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Which direction is the card moving again?  Mmmmm, gotta love that "design school" photoshopping...  Oh yeah, there's an article... brb]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[squeeg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've already decided that I am buying it. Based on the leaked performance numbers (90-99% as fast as a 4850), and max 80W power draw, this should be exactly what I want.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[futurepastnow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 5:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AMD's 40nm ATI Radeon HD 4770 outed, slated for May release?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/20/amds-40nm-ati-radeon-hd-4770-outed/</guid><description><![CDATA[This will be the first time a GPU is on a smaller process node than cpu that I can think of<br><br>Although intel has 32nm samples it wont be out until late Q4/early 2010]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[quasar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 20th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
