http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/ Engadget Comments for Broadcom and Qualcomm agree to stop suing one another, but not to stop hating http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:12PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 12:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/
someone enlighten me please :) ]]>Apr 26th 2009 11:27PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:33PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 12:11AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 12:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 3:06AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/
Then I did the math and found out that there have been 1,155 posts about the iPhone in the last two an a half years: http://www.engadget.com/tag/iphone/page/77/.

Really, Engadget? Really?]]>Apr 26th 2009 11:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 26th 2009 11:52PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/
So… how does that stack up with other gadgets? And so what if iPhone is getting the attention? How and why does it make Engadget, a gadget-related blog, "bad"? When you compare the proportions with # of iPhones posts with whatever, and compare that with say the number of articles/searches on cnet/google, does it correlate? My feeling is that it does… and considering that I've noticed how most of the iPhone-related posts here does generate a lot of comments (and hence traffic), again, why is it "bad" for Engadget to post them?

Stop the hating. It can't do you any good...]]>Apr 27th 2009 12:01AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 12:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 12:09AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/
Did you really need to use that word? ]]>Apr 27th 2009 12:34AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 1:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/Apr 27th 2009 5:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/26/broadcom-and-qualcomm-agree-to-stop-suing-one-another-but-not-t/
... good. Nothing lost there. Less work for them, more useful work from either of these companies. Let these companies do, what they are the best at.

I know nothing about these companies and what they do, but I think that, their time will be much better spent by focusing at what they do best, what they are there for. Innovating and implementing technology than fighting against each other, diluting their resolve, in meaningless wasting wasteful practices.
]]>Apr 30th 2009 9:09AM