<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[This guy again...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[theletterj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sheesh]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[giuliop]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great review - thanks, we'll be including it on the T1i/500D wiki at <a href="http://wiki.planett1i.com" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.planett1i.com</a> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK, so T1i > D5000 overall.  But for $90 more (if spending $90 more isn't an issue), is the D90 > T1i?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Quix]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Different levels...and it annoys me they kept comparing them.<br><br>The fact that the D90 has two scroll wheels and the screen on top put the D90 ahead...plus, if you DO get the D90 the kit lens is amazing, which saves you a good amount of money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[davidw]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[My money's on the D90, even with its jellyvision feature.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[david - Kit lenses aren't amazing.  Pro lenses are.  Kit lenses can be "amazing for a kit lens."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Joseph - <br><br>Get off your high horse.  Kit lenses can be amazing, and the Nikon 18-55mm DX is one that justly deserves this adjective.  When you don't need to carry an extra pound and a half of extra weight and much larger filters for something like the 17-55 f/2.8 (like, for instance, 90%+ of all outdoor non-sports photography in this focal length range) the kit lens is not only more appropriate, it performs as well or better!  <br><br>Some kit lenses are crap.  That one, which is the most common one Nikon ships, is amazing.  It's on the front of my D200 for significant amounts of the shooting I do.  The lenses that cost at least an order of magnitude more are amazing FOR SPECIFIC USES, but these are not the norm.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Warner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you're looking at the D90 its time to start taking lenses into consideration, and sadly, thats where Nikon loses<br><br>Dont get me wrong, Nikon has many great lenses....<br><br>But Nikon only makes lenses that are strictly Consumer or strictly Professional in price and spec<br><br>Canon has a lot more lenses that hit the middle ground, realizing that some people apreciate better build and optical quality without breaking the bank or your back, case in point are Canon's L-series f/4 trinity, the 17-40, 24-105 IS and the 70-200 f/4L IS.....the non-is 70-200 f/4 is actually a fairly affordable upgrade that most amateurs and casual shooters can easily afford to add to their system<br><br>And even though the D90 has the built-in focus motor, in-body AF is pretty poor...<br><br>Yes kit lenses can be nice, but i cant stand the build quality of the bloody things :/ or the size, some people want small and light and the 18-55 IS or 18-55 VR are both very very good, and Nikon has the best kit lens selection of anyone! [really, no joke, thats about all they bloody make]<br><br>But Nikon's AF-S autofocus on their lower end lenses is not as good as Canon's USM, Canon has been doing USM for a long time, and until you start touching their pro optics [Like the 70-200 VR] Canon is quicker here....Canon also has affordable lenses like their 85mm f/1.8 which works great for indoor sports and portraits...Nikon's works ok for portraits but forget sports with it [it lacks AF-S]<br><br>Also the D90's AF is not as good as my 30D, and this is speaking from shooting one, its slower and less accurate, the T1i has the same AF system as my 30D and the 40D/50D have an upgraded version of it thats far better...I've also handled a D300 and I used to have an EOS-3 which had Canon's top rung 45-point AF system, When you get there, Nikon and Canon are even, Until then, Canon is better than Nikon...<br><br>Nikon is starting to update their primes ever so slowly to incorporate AF-S...but right -now- Canon has the larger selection of lenses with USM and no compatability charts...<br><br>Also if you get serious and want to go full frame, the EOS-5D is much cheaper than the D700, it can be had for about $1200-1300 right now...<br><br>Nikon does have a far superior flash system if you want to do flash..<br><br>And oh yes, In my opinion, I dislike the D5000's rear OSD...I'm sorry, It looks like a joke to me and I cant see how its any "easier" to understand than the T1i....I look at the T1i's screen and I know what it all means instantly..the Nikon...less so...[I have a guess and after using it for a couple seconds id figure it out] The font looks screwy to me personally and I'd rather have the same OSD from the D90/D300..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenjis9965]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Overall I really wanted to prefer the D5000. Its articulating screen, battery life, build quality, subjectively cleaner output (see imaging resource) can do a lot for photography. But its menu layout is a bit too slow for someone coming from a full manual background (shouldn't have to go into menus to change WB, burst mode and ISO), and the D90 just a little too bulky and expensive. <br><br>The Nikon system lens I drool over is the AF-S 35mm - compact, light, well built and sharp (and even decent bokeh). <br><br>According to the SLRGear the Canon kit lens is sharper than the Nikon. But I also feel like lens sharpness isn't a huge deal, and I've learned to get by with a 50mm lens (for NYC city shooting) so I don't need 5x-10x zoom ranges. If I were to upgrade I'd get a faster lens - I love big apertures and low depth of field.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YpoCaramel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2009 1:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[just buy an olympus and be done with...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiran Nesarajah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[hello]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been saving for a 40D, but might after reading this, I might have to rethink. I confuzed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[irish.bug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[if better autofocus, better handling, better build and weather resistance don't mean much to you, then by all means got the 500D and put that spare cash into a 17-55 f.28. No regrets (unless you take it out into the rain).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neubdetat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[@IrishBug Nothing to think about.  40D would kick either one of this cameras a$$.  You can get a point and shoot camera with more megapixels, but when you are talking about an slr there is a lot more to consider.  Both of the cameras described above are entry level slr's.  40D is one level above it - it's semi professional. I'm not gonna get into an argument which camera 40D or 50D has more digital noise, but either one of them will be an improvement over those...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[here is my opinion which I do realize is worth very little.  if you are just looking to take pictures, and want the highest quality image in a semi-professional camera for the least money, then the 40D is the answer.  Furthermore, if you plan on doing very large prints or huge crops, then the 50D may be your answer for a little extra cash (and you'll get a much better LCD too).<br><br>but if you want to add in video, and still have incredible quality images the T1i is the way to go.  personally, i use a 40D and I am thrilled with it.  i upgraded from the Rebel XT when the 40D first came out so i payed a premium price and i never regretted the purchase.  the only thing i miss a bit is the smaller size of the XT line.  the 40D sometimes feels kind of big on when i am out some places.<br><br>I do not have any interest in video, but I absolutely see the value in having it, and think all these cameras are amazing.  nikons too.<br><br>its so hard to weigh out all the options and features these days with the competitive costs and awesome equipment.  but moving up to the xxD level will be a move anyone would be happy with if they have the extra cash and only want to take pics.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great write up. BTW - the last photo on the page... did you mean for the Nikon to be so out of focus, or do you not understand depth of field? :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Honza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I noticed that, and I thought it was a clever and subtle touch.<br><br>I've still got my eyes on the D90 though. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, for posting uncompressed video examples. So many camera reviews don't post actual video examples so that you can see if it's going to work well in your NLE.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hahn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[even as a Nikon fanboy I believe the D5000 is a waste. I was greatly disappointed when Nikon released it. <br>That said I won't be purchasing the T1i either, I'd simply jump up a level. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RAEGLATEM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm no Nikon specialist (rather Oly owner), but IMHO at its price level, D5k sits very nicely below D90. If one is in market for new camera and prefer Nikon, then they not gonna get confused.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dummy00001]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, I did have one question. Do either one of them have exposure lock in video mode?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Hahn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Leave your fanboy suit at the door?<br><br>Who is this, and what have you done with Engadget??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UnixSystemsEngineer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 11:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[So now that the world has an articulated screen DSLR after much bellyaching by the reviewing community (DPReview, etc.) over it's omission in previous models with regards to LiveView and video, it's not worth the trouble?<br><br>Can't we just admit cameras take still pictures and leave the video and other frivolities to the camcorder and Point'n'Shoot market? Why not put that research time into getting us cleaner images, better auto white balance, more advance AF systems and even more incredible high ISO performance?<br><br>Keep that bulls*** out of the D400 and just give me a better camera. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[intercede007]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I couldn't agree with you more. Sure, video might be a nice extra feature, and if you do both still and video, can help save a little money and only have to carry one camera, but like you said, I would much rather them spend their time and money working on better aspects for still pictures. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ungere]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yet again: A video camera, no matter how professional it is (unless we are talking about 10k+ RED cameras or their 100k+ competitors) will not get a look similar to the one of a DSLR with video capabilities. I suppose those who want to make movies (as in for TV or cinema) will rather buy a 5D Mk II, which is still very cheap compared to the alternatives, but young filmmakers might prefer an entry level DSLR, due to it's low price. These cameras may revolutionize cinema, now finally it doesn't take big, expensive, complicated 35mm cameras where every minute you shoot costs a lot, no matter if it turns up on screen or not, to make a good looking film.<br><br>Then again, the majority will be happy with a DSLR that takes good photos, so... I do see your point. I wish my Pentax would have a video mode though...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kadajawi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[@kadajawi: I think you're entirely missing the "prosumer" level cameras, such as the Panasonic AG-HVX200. They run around $5K, use Leica lenses, shoot lots of HD modes (720p/24/30/60, 1080/60i or 1080/24p) use 3CCD sensors, record to P2 or external hard drives, dual XLR inputs, and plenty of other controls. <br><br>There's no way I would trade that for a dSLR, and I suspect you don't really have any professional video experience or you would have remembered that video needs to include audio.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[In x years the digital SLR-form factor will replace the "video camera" for all practical applications. I'd say x is between 5 and 7 years.<br><br>As a long-time Canon owner, I hope they put a flexible screen on future models. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dj radon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 8th 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can we redo the pictures again with less depth of field?  With focus?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LloydChiro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[If that was with regards to the last photo, i think it was to highlight the fact that the Canon "won" the review.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 7th 2009 9:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[im a firm believer that whether you go nikon or canon is a moot point because you cant go wrong with either.  also, if you have invested in a lot of glass for either of them you probably want to just stick with that.  regardless, to me the image quality from the nikon appears to be better in the example images here (although a couple of the shots from the canon appear to be slightly overexposed).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[owdee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those pictures are just...wrong.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone needs to buy a tripod before they review another camera. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[intercede007]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm new to the whole DSLR market and will wait for more reviews before deciding. But if I do go with the Canon (body only), what lens would you recommend me to buy?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexandre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is maybe a reason why to go with nikon, out of the box the lense that come with the kit will be what you would use most of the time.<br><br>Engadget reminds me of Car and driver.  Canon is Honda and Nikon is toyota.  Nothing can ever be wrong with canon.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bagbklyn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, Canon's kit lens is considered to be pretty good, especially for the price.  Take a look:<br><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_18-55_3p5-5p6_is_c16/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_18-55_3p5-5p6_is_c16/</a><br><br>If you're new to DSLRs, it might make sense to just start with the kit lens and then figure out what lenses you want to buy after you have a bit of experience.  Even if you do end up buying expensive glass, the kit lens can always be a fallback - it's lightweight and should get the job done just fine.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheMarioBrutha]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[whats with the weird order of your gallery?? just give us some side by sides!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some of the samples are out of focus. hard to compare when they are. I would step up to the d90 for an overall better camera than both if I was on the lookout for a canon or nikon. 15 megapixles are also just too much on that small chip.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Geir E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Considering most of the ISO test shots are out of focus, the rest of this review should probably just be ignored. Unless of course you want impressions by somebody who clearly doesn't know anything about photography!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[engadget]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA["-- is still a feature we appreciated having. After all, a shot with loads of noise is better than no shot at all, right? " The "head-to-head" lost all credibility with me at this very moment. Not to mention just the sheer amount of "it feels better" type comments about T1i's body only makes me feel that this comparison was rushed and biased in the first place.<br><br>We get it, you've made love with your T1i while the D5000 recorded it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good review. But I disagree that the kit lens has no value.  This is the entry level dslr, and at this level most buyers aren't looking to spend more money on extra lenses.  The canon kit lens has excellent reviews for quality, light weight and image stabilization and covers most shooting situations outside of telephoto.  A good telephoto lenses is $200-250.  An all in one 18-200 with stabilization is about $600.  Remember, they're going to need to buy a $50-70 sdhc card to hold all those photos and videos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wonder why so many of reviewers/professional are such dead set against an articulating display. Have you guys never worn glasses or have you never felt the need to shoot a photo over people's heads or get down to the ground level without getting your clothes dirty?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[brahmachari99]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[because they're "traditionalist". the same ones who dragged their feet and complained the whole way about using a zoom vs a prime. they're not interest in having all available options to help get the best pictures. with every new feature that is added the arrogance of these know it all types starts to seep from every pore and can be detected from a mile away. oddly enough,10yrs from now when every camera has these sorts of features those same traditionalist type will be using them and complaining about the next user friendly feature added. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[urdaddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 3:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed! I've a Canon Powershot G2 with an articulating display. While the optics are weak, the ability to shoot over the heads of the crowd at kids' events s fantastic, as is the ability to get "monster child" shots as the youngest learned to walk.<br><br>Some of my best photos happened because I could hold the camera at an unusal angle and still see how the image was framed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dagwud]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 10:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[top tip genius. if you're going to demo a camera that shoots progressive frame , don't whip pan it around because the picture will look like shit. the picture will look like shit on a Red One if you do that. Stick to reviewing usb rocket launchers or whatever it is you guys do all day!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[matey87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you want an easy to use pro camera, buy the Canon Rebel T1i. The Nikon is a consumer camera, because it has a swiveling screen and they don't have as many pro lenses as Canon's. Pros trust Canon and my uncle is a wedding photographer and he said Canon's are the best. Also, Nikon doesn't have experience in video, so it's best to skip Nikon's pathetic attempt to incorporate video into their DSLR line. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iKurt4]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[and also skip this guys pathetic attempt at giving DSLR advice because he obviously sucks at it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[urdaddy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why are you trying to make a point when it's OBVIOUS you have no clue what you're talking about? BOTH of these cameras are consumer cameras, and if you think the T1I is a pro-level camera you're a moron.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David W]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 1st 2009 10:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[urdaddy, David W, iKurt4 does "OBVIOUSly suck" at giving DSLR advice and that's because the points he's making are sarcastic!  the question is, why are you so overwrought that you fail to see his and instead jump in to educate him?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[anghammarad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 1:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Canon EOS Rebel T1i impressions, head-to-head with Nikon D5000]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/canon-eos-rebel-t1i-impressions-head-to-head-with-nikon-d5000/</guid><description><![CDATA[About that gallery... what a wierd set of pictures!  Unfortunately, the bluriness and poor depth of field in many of them make me wonder if the article was written by the right folks.  You had to know someone would comment, right?!<br><br>D.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drzeller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:19PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
