<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice render.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 12:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, for a render, its pretty bad...<br>M]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BigDaddyM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a nice looking handset. 10X better than those Centros.  It looks sweet for a low-end smartphone.  If the cost is low enough, it might even sell better than the Pre.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[iphonerulez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah... I kinda agree.  Looks quite fishy to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[The render throws me for a few reasons.<br><br>1. WebOS isn't fully rendered on there. Was this a phone designed before the software was totally finished or something?<br>2. The keys have really weird depth of field to 'em, like they're just textures<br>3. Seems perspectively incorrect]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nerdtalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's still no iphone]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSuburbanWhiteBoy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pre lite?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[*Just some girl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[As much as I'd love to see a WebOS candy bar on ATT, this render looks extremely fishy for a number of reason.  <br><br>Nerdtalker brings up good points, despite the misuse of the term "depth of field."  :-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe23521]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[320x200 for the fail]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTitor]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree that the render looks fishy for the above-mentioned reasons.  The keys look like they're texture mapped on, without depth, and that home button actually looks bigger than on the Pre (also lacks depth).<br><br>Even if the Eos IS going to be a real device, this render screams 'early mock-up', and the 320x400 screen res doesn't sound right either.<br><br>Delving into conspiracy land here, but...<br><br>Maybe it's a plant by AT&T to retain some of the iPhone users who might be considering jumping ship.  :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Strangis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interestingly, I think the Centro is the same dimensions 4.3 inches x 2.1 inches (of course the centro is much thicker). I could definitely see palm going with this form factor. Looking at the Centro, if you get rid of the center navigation buttons, and extend the screen down further, you end up with a phone looking like the Eos. well, use your imagination a little....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cowabungaCarl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[@JohnTitor<br>"320x200 for the fail"<br><br>Well that would be a fail - thank goodness it clearly says in the article that it is 320x400 huh?<br><br>Can't RTFA for the fail...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stuff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Multiple WebOS devices FTW<br><br>Not digging that giant button, however.  Kill the button, shorten the device, and deal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gibson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[My bad. Bad render, great concept.<br><br>My inbox begs for relief.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[superhobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 5:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Welcome back, Palm. We missed you these last few years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[yep...<br><br>guess I'll hold on to that PALM stock for a little longer now]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, no crap.  I had written off Palm a couple years ago.  I saw the Centro as their last failed attempt at saving the company, and classified their next-gen OS as vaporware.<br><br>Kudos to the great leadership team that has given the company a complete 180.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamokazi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't celebrate yet; they've yet to get these products out the door.  Don't get me wrong.  I'm considering jumping ship from tMobile (after 5 years) for the Pre, but it _might_ end up being a dud (Blackberry Storm).  I really hope it does well, because I want Palm to do well and because I'd love to get some seemingly awesome tech like the Pre into my hands, but I won't count my chickens before they hatch.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew -- PS360: uphillbothways]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 6:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know, some people love the BlackBerry Storm.  A couple million by this mark anyhow.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[moog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2009 6:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm ecstatic that Palm has gone back to its roots of being an innovative and exciting company and I have no doubt that this phone will be a hit. @moog, I would say that at least a few million of those people went on hype alone and realized that the Storm didn't turn out to be what they thought. Let's hope for Palm's sake that's not the case when it comes to the Pre.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oZone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 8:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[will take it with some wifi, and reality please.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thing looks better than the pre... & i like the pre... sliders just suck...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Junior]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[The main thing I don't like about the Pre, hardware design-wise, is that the slider is portrait instead of landscape.  Otherwise, it's quite fetching.<br><br>There seem to be plenty of people who agree that this thing looks nice, but I don't get it.  Whatever virtues it has, it ranks near the very bottom for me on aesthetic appeal for a qwerty smartphone.  Different strokes I guess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[@mian, I think it's mostly due to its small size and the way it appears to fit smoothly into the hand (as seen in videos). Still have to wait to actually test it, which shouldn't be too long.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Templarian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[So why buy a Pre now?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Freakin Ijit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because Sprint has a faster network, cheaper plans, and they don't bend over for the NSA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neodorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Pre also looks nicer too!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellianth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[So you can be all "First!"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan S]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Keyboard, bigger, inductive charging?<br><br>Plus, it's coming out sooner.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nerdtalker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Pre looks better and is better spec wise.  This looks like a lower end Pre.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oghowie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still, it would be funny for ATT to release a Palm WebOS based phone before the Pre!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kjb434]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Because the pre has the 320 * 480 display, however I assume that the 320 *400 mentioned here is an error...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Buis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cause the pre exists.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[moush]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 3:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[@neodorian: No, but as the -only- wireless carrier to do so, Sprint -does- bend over to suck off the federal government for a bailout.<br><br>Truth's a bitch, boy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[backbeat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 3rd 2009 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think someone just put together a render based on the blurry phone pics we saw earlier?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vicken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[If it was a render of the blurry photo, wouldn't they have pasted in a screenshot of WebOS from the Pre?  I haven't seen a Pre screenshot like the one on the Eos.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[T-Will]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the rumors are true, and this is going to at&t, what the hell is verizon doing? Do they even know Palm still exists? Yes, they have the centro, but come'on!<br><br>I just want a smartphone that is awesome! :(<br><br>As soon as my contract expires (1 year), I am switching if Verizon doesn't get anything cool. Knowing my luck, they will get something cool, and then charge an insane amount for it. $349 HTC Touch Pro anyone? Or how about a $299 Touch Diamond.<br><br>Sigh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Merton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Verizon always gets smartphones last.  The good ones at least.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neodorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Verizon gets it last because they have to spend even more time than other disable capabilities.  Also, most of the good smartphones start off as GSM based except for the ones Sprint shells out big buck to have an exclusivity agreement.<br><br>Verizon isn't will to go all exclusive upfront with pretty much anything.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kjb434]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Verizon is the last to come out with the new devices because it takes their engineers longer to lock down all of the phone's useful features and tie you to their Pay Per Use features.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I wasn't so obsessed with the Pre, I would consider getting the Eos.  I'm glad Palm is getting back in the game.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[No Wi-Fi, only 4 GB of storage, and more expensive than the iPhone. Pre wins.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reality Check]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bet that's the unsubsidized price, cause those specs are pretty lowend. Will sort of. A year and a half ago I would have been really excited. Now I would be if it's $99 on contract.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darrobot]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[No keyboard, multitasking, or choice of networks.  iphone loses.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[neodorian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's eyo before subsidy. That doesn't tell us anything about the price after.<br>The lack of wifi is the real bummer. <br>One big question is whether it will run on the same OMAP SoC as the Pre or if palm chose one without the SGX.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shyam D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[No WiFi when you have a massive 3G network like Verizon's is somewhat forgivable..  <br><br>No WiFi when you have AT&T's tiny 3G network is a massive fail.  Though maybe on a low end device like that you have to make that sacrifice to avoid super battery draining...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dorf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is there any word on touchstone support for the Eos?  Also can the storage be extend with SD cards?  <br><br>Yay I really wanted a palm WebOS device and I have At&t.<br><br>Keep the news coming.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hearsay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Given how thin that thing is, and how much Palm insisted that the Pre is missing an SD slot to keep it thin, I doubt it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cocoviper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 2:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[pre-rebate dude.  that means that it will be sold for between $100-150.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Calder Huntington]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm Eos: super-thin, 3G, and headed to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-super-thin-3g-and-headed-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they include a memory expansion slot then this is a total win.  Otherwise I think 4 gigs is a little on the low side.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2009 1:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
