<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't understand how a company can make the music last 50 hours while video lasts for only 3.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ossger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 7:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sort of like if you had a car battery in an iphone, and the back lighting was 4 incandescent bulbs. Do you get it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fishy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[/facepalm]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kompulsive]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats because you are stupid...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Schweppes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 10:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[this is really great.. i just wish they had 16 GB for 99 bucks, and i would be sold... :P]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[darok3k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[Given it's feature set I'm really not seeing any compelling advantage that a touchscreen would provide over hardware controls and lots of potential disadvantages.<br><br>Is there any reason for the touchscreen other then high-end players that have them to efficiently control their significantly broader feature sets have them, thus, it is "cool"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John McKee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[CNET is the best.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[somebowwow@gmail.com]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA["they also shouldn't expect something that rivals ones costing twice as much."<br><br>Bwah?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 8:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Memorex TouchMP PMP gets reviewed: not bad for $99]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/14/memorex-touchmp-pmp-gets-reviewed-not-bad-for-99/</guid><description><![CDATA[good deal for the price.  i never use the video aspect of my iPod.  Just bought that model for maximum storage space.  something like this is worthy of consideration.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 14th 2009 10:33PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
