http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/ Engadget Comments for Intel presentation promises Medfield-based smartphones by 2011 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 7:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 8:26PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/
Yes, because, we are both entitled to an opinion. I know it's hard for some people to grasp. Both phone OS's suck, but then again, I never mentioned windows so.....]]>May 17th 2009 8:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 9:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 7:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 8:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 12:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 1:10AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/
Why would the manafacturers change to less powerful, more expensive chips which suck much more power than the ARM designs which practically everyone uses? Besides, RISC is particularly useful for mobiles.

In my opinion, there's far more chance of ARM RISC chips colonising the desktop - the netbook invasion is about to begin - than Intel getting anywhere near phones. They're 5 years behind in terms of performance per watt!]]>May 18th 2009 9:48AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 7:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 3:02AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/
hum....]]>May 17th 2009 8:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 8:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 8:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 3:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 7:29AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 8:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 9:03PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 17th 2009 9:18PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/]]>May 17th 2009 9:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/
Anyways, of course cellphones were their long-time goal since they are the future of computing and the world produces billions every year!]]>May 17th 2009 10:37PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 1:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.techreviews4u.com/2009/01/04/asus-p320-pictures/ a smartphone or a pocket pc, whats the difference between the two ?

]]>May 18th 2009 1:52AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 8:25AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 12:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 2:08AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/> "A seemingly recent Intel presentation..."

The presentation is from Intel's investor meeting last week (May 12-13) and was delivered by Anand Chandrasekher, Senior VP - Ultra Mobility Group. The slides and a video of the presentation are available at Intel's web site:

http://intelstudios.edgesuite.net/im/index.htm]]>May 18th 2009 3:14AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/May 18th 2009 4:40AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/
PXA270 for example (what's in the HTC universal among other things).]]>May 18th 2009 8:23AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/17/intel-presentation-promises-medfield-based-smartphones-by-2011/http://whollysblog.com/]]>May 18th 2009 8:34AM