<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[O wow that is very cool. I could find my self using that. It would be very good in testing speed things up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[marzy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Speed? I am not really if the repeaters can have the same bandwidth as that of the primary WiFi user. Likely, the bandwidth will be smaller, thus the speed will decline. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfian Maheru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[he ment speeding up the setup of a mesh/repeater not speeding up the internet]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Soooo, you couldnt use this to trunk 2 wireless connections together?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nzo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[@nzo<br><br>AFAIK, you would only get more bandwidth by trunking, if the networks you connect to are on non-overlapping channels. I've seen a few tricks done with custom firmware on routers/APs, and the bandwidth you can get from using only one channel is limited.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 3:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[I actually remember installing from the Microsoft Labs (or whatever they called it) waaaaay back in 2005. It was pretty unstable, and required a lot of tinkering just to get it to work. Then they announced they abandoned the project and I pretty much forgot about it.<br><br>Good to see they are still working on this.<br><br>So I can steal all of my neighbors WiFi connections and funnel them all into Azureus's obscure "Multiple interface routing" option:<br><a href="http://kakku.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/combine-two-connections-for-a-single-torrent-download-routing-through-multiple-uplinks/" rel="nofollow">http://kakku.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/combine-two-connections-for-a-single-torrent-download-routing-through-multiple-uplinks/</a><br>(scroll down a bit)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ThreeDee912]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe this would let me connect to VPN with one app while staying off the VPN in another app.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 19th 2009 2:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just to get us off on the right foot... suck it, Apple!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FlashFreeze]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Every time I see webspace being wasted to initiate another fanboy war, a little part of me dies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Ladella]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your HP must be over 1,000,000 because it happens a lot]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CLShortFuse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just to nip it in the bud, macs have had airport sharing for an effing long time. Ad-hoc, p2p, Ethernet/FireWire/wifi sharing... Yeah, real long time.<br><br>I have no interest in a fanboy war. How is this MS tech different?<br><br>Please stfu FF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NoAndThen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[This tech creates two virtual adapters running on one real hardware adapter, in the same way that you can run two OSes through virtual machines today. I heard about it a few years ago and was pretty impressed then, and I'm still impressed by it. No OS has this, and Apple certainly hasn't hinted that they want to bring virtualisation to OSX.<br><br>That said, I've been using wireless networks for a while now, and I haven't needed to connect to two networks at once. It's a good start at using virtualisation to bring new features to consumers, but the possibilities go much further than this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KarlW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 11:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't know much about apple products, but it sounds to me like you are describing sharing a single wired connection with your Airport (correct me if I am wrong). This as you said, is nothing new. We are talking about allowing one wireless adapter to show up with multiple virtual interfaces, so that each virtual interface can be connected to a different network. Something that we have been able to do with Ethernet for quite some time, but not WiFi.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thequinox]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[NoAndThen:<br>This is completely different.<br><br>Apple's sharing lets you share your non-WiFi connection over WiFi. So if you have ethernet, you can share your ethernet connection over WiFi. You could also share your WiFi connection over ethernet. I've even shared my Bluetooth connection over WiFi before. But you can only join one WiFi network at a time and you cannot create one WiFi network (acting as a base station) while you join another.<br><br>But this new MS sharing would let you join one WiFi network and then share it as another WiFi network. So for example, if you are in a hotel where you are allowed to join one device to a WiFi network, you can then turn around and reshare that as another base station for other device (or people) to join. Or you can join two WiFi networks at once.<br><br>MS system is more flexible than Apple's system you speak of. It maybe useful in some situations.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 11:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Spot the typical Apple fans who didn't read the article before proclaiming that OSX already has this tech. IT DOESN'T<br>This is NOT connection sharing (yes XP had that back in 2001) it is being able to connect to more than 1 network with 1 wifi card.<br>Could be great if you can combine internet speeds or send a packet to each one to double your bandwidth.<br>Nice to see a genuine bit of innovation here eh ?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Major4Play]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 3:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's analogous to Diamond's dual line modem suprasonic from back in the 98se days where you can use 2 modems to double the bandwidth.  with this vwifi, any win 7 based wifi hardware can connect to more than 1 hotspot or network to double its bandwidth.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xconan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably speed up attacks against security protocols too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Spacek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmph....this is interesting...however im assuming you will see some kind of speed hit if you are acting as an access point and a client.<br><br>although, if there is already an access point near by i cant think of why I would want to create another separate wireless network.i guess its good to have the option.<br><br><br>Lets hope there arnt tons of stipulations to make this happen normally.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eMax]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[eerrr, because you might have an exclusive connection to a wireless AP and you might want to share the internet with other people you are working with who don't have access.<br><br>A great idea.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wasn't this thing available in Linux for YEARS now? The madwifi drivers for the atheros, if I remember well, were doing this. The problem though is that it was getting slow as you added more adapters, but I don't think that Microsoft or anyone can fix that.<br><br>so then... here's and announcement about something that on one side is not that new and on the other it does work in practice yet... yeah... still not buying Vista or 7 or whatever...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vikingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it does it make a sound?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jboy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's right, Vikingu. You can use wlanconfig to create multiple `virtual' NICs... ath0, ath1, ath2... I commonly do this so as to have one virtual card in normal Managed mode (so I'm connected to my router like normal) but also have another virtual card in Monitor mode at the same time. But yes you can put the virtual cards in whatever mode you like and connect to whatever you please. I've never really found a use for it so don't bother (at the end of the day you have to pick one gateway to take your outside network (i.e. internet) traffic through).<br><br>Yes it does take a bit of a speed hit.<br><br>Shame you got low-ranked, what you wrote is quite correct.<br><br>I didn't read the article so Microsoft's implementation may differ somewhat from what Atheros/madwifi has had under Linux for the past few years, but it sounds broadly similar.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xerxesdaphat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes. Although to be fair to Microsoft, virtual WiFi was invented by their research group, years before it was implemented in Linux.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jepzilla]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 2:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would think if you connect to 2 non-overlapping channel APs, there may be some speed increase, assuming they both have the same signal strength and capabilities.<br><br>If they're on the same channel, it would act a little more like a switched VLAN. No increase in throughput, but ability to bridge two networks at layer 2 could be worth the trade off.<br><br>Of course, now hardware manufacturers have yet another excuse to not build native Linux drivers!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh my - as simple and swift as it is now for the average user to create/maintain a wireless network, this should be a walk in the park. Especially considering Microsoft's history of customer-friendly and well thought out implementations.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankfurter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[if we were still talking about vista and it's insane networking then i'd agree with the sarcasm, but considering how simple they made wireless and networking in windows 7 it's kinda moot ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[LOL dude the linux equivilent is a pain in the ass, this works as it worked flawlessly since it was in MSR, and the fact that their limiting it to 1 virtual adapter per wifi card means that the speed issue shouldnt be a problem and should be very practical, and not just atheros either as to be a win7 driver you need to have this ability in your driver as well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Many cards have this capability in linux, intel cards for example. I find it utterly amusing that you think limits is a good thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kingu]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 12:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's not Windows 7... it's Vista 1.5   :D]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranger Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[As is OS 10.1...10.2...10.3...10.4...10.5...10.6.  Menial upgrades to the core OS.  The difference being it didn't take MS 8 year to decide to go back and clean up the **** that is under the hood of Vista which is EXACTLY was 10.6 is.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Doe.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 3:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[FINALLY I can play my Nintendo DS online without screwing the rest of my network by turning off WPA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joanna D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 8:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agreed! Cool!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[thebomberman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's exactly what I was thinking. Hooray!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[therpham]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is probably the best use suggested in the thread so far. Not so much the DS part, but the fact it can be useful for devices that have poor WPA implementations - they can just piggy back off the adapter. Sure it's a security risk, but if it could be restricted to a single MAC address it would be quite useful (again, MAC addresses can be cloned/spoofed but it's still handy).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daza]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Isn't this already offered by Intel MyWifi technology? My Lenovo T400 has the ability to create another wireless network and bridge the two.<br>Heres an overview: <a href="http://www.cnet.com.au/intel-s-my-wi-fi-makes-my-internet-yours-339294335.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnet.com.au/intel-s-my-wi-fi-makes-my-internet-yours-339294335.htm</a>  I don't see any jazz in what Microsoft is doing here. Anyone care to explain?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lonerjoshy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[So I already have this?  Cool, all I need now is a driver and a situation in which there are two wireless networks available or in which it would be useful for people to access wireless via my laptop rather than from the wireless network I'm connected to.<br>I think getting drivers is far more likely than ever having an opportunity to use it.  But obviously there are people who will be very glad to have this technology, or Microsoft wouldn't have included it.  (Now all I need is something to prevent the wireless network I was using earlier today from going up and down like... a really wavy thing.  I actually had to plug a network cable into my laptop for the first time in many many months.)<br>Oh, and clever title.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'M NOT AN APPLE-FANBOY!!!<br><br>Wasn't Apple already doing that for years? At the time I had my iBook G4 and even before I was able to share my internet connection wirelessly. My friend's Ethernet port wasn't working, so I have my iBook connected and shared the Internet over AirPort...<br><br>Hum, thinking about it, it was Ethernet-to-Wireless sharing... but I THINK it was working for Wireless-to-Wireless also, isn't it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cedrikfd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[no, just etherenet-to wifi or wife-to-ethernet.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[My bad, thanks for correcting!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cedrikfd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:29AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[i remember using it to share a wifi connection i was connected to through my wifi before so i don't think its only ethernet to wifi]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[yasun]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Slow or Fast and who cares if Linux and Apple had it before, it wasn't available to the common users, which I last remember is "windows users." If you want speed and high performance get something that is designed for that. Windows 7 is great, it has a little of everything and I’m glad that Microsoft is catching up with the times and making it really easy for the end user. Seriously, I don't complain that paint doesn't have drop shadows at a click of button (I can thank adobe photoshop for that one). I'm glad Windows is stepping up to Apple which IMO have been making things seamless for users for years. These software giants learn (steal, whatever you wanna call it) from each other which is why we have better and better technology every min.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[onesmartguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another thing Mac's can't do.... HAHahahaha<br><br>Windows 7 FTW!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Me4u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually Windows 7 can't do this either. Did you read the article, you little Bill Gates wannabe?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankfurter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[@Franfurter<br><br>" Apparently this functionality is indeed included in the latest release candidate, but as there are no drivers currently supporting this feature it's not enabled. Expect the driver situation to change very soon"<br><br>-Quote from the article<br><br><br>Did you read the article, you little Steve Jobs' cock sucker???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Me4u2]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[bwahahahahaha]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FNG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is that a red squiggly "misspelled" line underneath NWifi and VWifi in the picture???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aardWolf]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[And under Netsh too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Setnev]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 7:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[So apparently no one noticed that whoever made this lovely graphic left the words NWifi, VWifi, and Netsh defined as misspelled words. I think that is hilarious. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerod]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[So we're never going to be able to run Netstumbler on a Windows PC again are we?  That's one reason I DO actually miss XP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/18/microsofts-virtual-wifi-will-make-windows-7-wireless-adapters-d/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wouldn't this be a needed option for the new bluetooth standard?  I was wondering how they were going to create a private network (using wifi) between devices to share the data at high speed if one of the devices was already attached to a network.  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rngeek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 18th 2009 1:02PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
